Hi Del,
Thanks for notifying that new feature : I will test it immediately !
I'm however sorry to inform you that contrarily to your assumption, and despite
the fact that I subscribed to "IBM my notifications" as well as to " Technical
Support Newsletter", both related to Spectrum protect, that
Hi All,
Another question in regards of TSM container based deduplicated pools ...
Are you experiencing the same behavior than this : using "q stg f=d" targeting
a deduped container based storage pool, I observe following output :
q stg f=d
Storage Pool Name: CONT_STG
Hi Arnaud,
I was having a conversation about this other day. With today's social
media blitz, it can become an overload of information and different people
like to learn about things in different ways. Some people told me they
like something in their InBox. Others said their InBox was too full
Robert,
you run protect stgpool prior to replicate node. By doing the protect
first, you can reduce the amount of traffic needed for the replicate node
process. Also, without performing protect stgpool, you loose the ability
to use REPAIR STGPOOL as it depends on Protect Stgpool being performe
Hello Guys
Thanks’ a lot for the output…. Really appreciate
Best Regards
Robert Ouzen
Haifa University
Israel
From: Ron Delaware [mailto:ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:30 PM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Cc: רוברט אוזן
Subject: Fw: [ADSM-L] Help on Directory Container
Hi,
has anyone been able to use ssl with the cert256.arm? The ssl connection
using cert.arm runs fine, but we would like to move on to the cert256.arm.
We tried it on a Solaris10 server with ISP 7.1.4.100 and on a Windows 2012
Server with ISP 7.1.4.0, but have not been able to connect the admin
in
Arnaud,
I too am seeing odd percentages where containerpools and dedup is
concerned. I have a small remote server pair that protects ~23 TB of pre
dedup data, but my containerpools show an occupancy of ~10 TB, which
should be a data reduction of over 50%. However, a q stg on the
containerpool on
Del,
After upgrading to 7.1.5 is there a way to get pre-existing container data
compressed?
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:53 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]
Hi Markus,
> has anyone been able to use ssl with the cert256.arm? The ssl connection
> using cert.arm runs fine, but we would like to move on to the cert256.arm.
> We tried it on a Solaris10 server with ISP 7.1.4.100 and on a Windows 2012
> Server with ISP 7.1.4.0, but have not been able to conne
Hi David,
No. Only newly stored data will be compressed.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2016
09:41:27 AM:
> From: David Ehresman
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 03/22/2016 09:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Real world deduplicatio
Hi,
but already client side compressed data isn't affected, isn't it?
what if data is replicated. Is that data then compressed?
Regards,
Alex
Von:Del Hoobler
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU,
Datum: 22.03.2016 15:14
Betreff:Re: [ADSM-L] Real world deduplication rates with TSM 7.1
an
@Del,
Additional question : if replicating compressed data, will the data be
transmitted compressed or uncompressed ?
Cheers.
Arnaud
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Alexander Heindl
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:19 PM
To:
Hello,
Correct, current client-side compression is not affected.
Spectrum Protect is targeting client-side compression integrated with
dedup and this new compression later this year.
As for replication, if the target storage pool is a container pool with
compression enabled, the data extents a
If you are using node replication, you could re-replicate the data and get
it compressed (both ways). It may be a bit much work, feasible perhaps for
selected nodes.
Joerg Pohlmann
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent
Matthew,
Just a question : how do you know the size of pre-dedup data ?
Did you make use of backup reports on each clients to get that information, or
built some query based on dedupstats table, or anything else ?
Here again, I cannot seem to find coherent information in TSM output ...
Let's
Posting again... seems like the first one was rejected...
Hello,
Correct, current client-side compression is not affected.
Spectrum Protect is targeting client-side compression integrated with
dedup and this new compression later this year.
I just noticed that apar IT12010: SERVER-TO-SERVER SSL COMMUNICATION FAILS
USING CA-SIGNED CERTIFICATES is fixed in TSM server 7.1.5.0.
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bjoern
Rackoll
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:10 AM
I'll third the odd percentages... using 7.1.3.100.
tsm: TSMPRD02>select sum(reporting_mb) from OCCUPANCY where
stgpool_name='SASCONT0'
Unnamed[1]
--
182520798.90
tsm: TSMPRD02>q stg sascont0
Storage Device
Thanks.
TSM support also came up with this one as we logged the PMR. But
unfortunately, it does not apply to us, as we didn't delete the 'TSM
Server SelfSigned SHA key' from the certificate database.
Bjoern
> I just noticed that apar IT12010: SERVER-TO-SERVER SSL COMMUNICATION FAILS
> USING
Just jumping into the cloud storage arena with tsm.
Just installed server 7.1.5 to experiment with cloud storage.
We have been mandated to replace our largely tape based environment with amazon
cloud storage.
I know very little of tsm's implementation of this, and how it may be used.
I see lots
Hi all,
TSM deduplication is effective combined with compression. Without compression,
I'm not sure that it worths what it costs (1:2,5 ratio or 65% is what I
generally see with mixed data and "standard" retention).
You all should whatch this Tricia Jiang's video on YouTube (from 7:11) :
https
Thanks David, Bjoern for the great hints!
We are testing the self-signed certificates created by the server instance,
so at this stage, no third-party certificate is involved, using the dsmadmc
native commandline (no hub-server, no oc, no server-to-server, all down to
absolute basics. Using gskit
22 matches
Mail list logo
