Guys
A quick one, It's been a while, so I can't remember. Creating a new
Virtual Library on a ProtecTIER, is that non-disruptive to existing
Virtual libraries?
If it makes a difference, it's the latest and greatest v2.4.1.0
Thanks
Steven
Hi All,
Is there a free tool available which replaces the TSM Operational Reporting?
And I don't mean the TSM Reporting & Monitoring (which is just a bunch of crap
imho).
I know about tools like TSM Reporter (PLCS) and TSMManager, but I just want a
free tool which is quick and dirty and does
Been looking through the information center and publications centers.
The only mac documentation I can find is for client v5.5.
Is there documentation for any later version of the client?
If so, could some one please send me a link?
Thanks for the help.
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball St
Mac OS X is fully considered Unix, by TSM, now, so is in the Unix
Client manual.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp
Richard Sims
I had the old release 2.2.0.0 creating additional vtl was not impact the
existing one. But on the host side (TSM server side) it is highly likely to
reboot the server to discover the newly created vtl.
Pawlos
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.e
FWIW,
You can get OR to work OK with V6.
You just have to customize it by removing the queries that go after tables that
don't exist or aren't the same.
Look in the activity log after you try running OR against your V6 server, you
can see which queries fail and why.
W
-Original Message
Hello.
We are in the process of upgrading our TSM-servers on AIX(5,.3/6.1) to TSM
6.2. We have always used raw devices for disk stgpools, db and logs but with
6.2 jfs2 is the rule.
Any tip on mount options? Should cio be used anywhere? I understand that the
application will take care of caching f
Hello,
I'm looking for anyone who is using SQL-Backtrack for Sybase and Data
Domain/TSM?
We are replacing our Virtual Tape libraries and physical tape library with
Data Domains. One here onsite and another at our DR location. We have
setup the Data Domain to emulate VTL.
We are experiencing p
We experienced the same thing in our testing.
The more redundancy you have the better de-dup works :)
As soon as you compress your dumps you are not going to be able to de-dup as
well as uncompressed data.
I have yet to see a de-dup product that is cost effective with compressed files.
-O
This is a common problem with deduplication, and someone at EMC should have
told you this before you bought.
You should not/cannot run compression on your backups before they get to the
dedupe system. It messes most of them up.
As to finding someone with your config? Good luck with that. Data
What is your compression rate from the node? If it is in the same range of the
DataDomain then do you really care?
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Nancy
L Leugemors
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 12:23 PM
To: AD
We used to use SQLBacktrack with Falconstor. Regardless of the specific
configuration, the problem is obviously compression/encryption doesn't mix
with deduplication.
You're best bet would be to speed up your backup with something other than
compression. 10gb NICs or a lan-free configuration if
unsubscribe
Curtis,
>> Data Domain has good market share, but very few DD customers use VTL.
Really? That surprises me a little (i.e., the marginalised VTL usage) and isn't
necessarily representative of the TSM customers I've spoken to or worked with
using DDRs, many of whom still use the VTL functionality
>From what I understand the EMC/DD Best Practice is to use NFS/CIFS mounts
with File device classes over 10gb connections. The main benefit cited
is the concurrent access to file volumes. There is a TSM/DD Best
Practices document out there from Glasshouse a few years ago that mentions
this. (Whi
For the record, here's a link to the GlassHouse white paper - it is very
good but, as Shawn pointed out, rather old now and quite a few of the
figures are out of date (I should disclose I'm doing some Data Domain/TSM
work for GlassHouse at the moment):
http://pdf.edocr.com/6cb6a7b31a5be6dd526302c6
The last time I checked <10% of DD customers use the VTL option. I'm
willing to bet that 60-80% of those are TSM customers. The TSM folks I've
talked to seem to prefer using VTL over file-type devices, which may explain
that. The rest of the world (except large enterprise customers) tends to
pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
