Hi Thomas,
That is correct, you can run the Library manager server on a different
platform.
I think you will have problem to run TSM under VMware. Probably much easier in
XEN because you can give direct access to hardware in XEN.
To get VMware to get direct access via SAN to your library is poss
Hi KM!
I followed your suggestion 2. When I now issue a delete filespace I
receive a different error:
ANRD afcputil.c(1463): ThreadId <46> Volume 371653 is not defined
for pool -1.
ANRD ThreadId <46> issued message from:
ANRD ThreadId <46> 0x000100017f78 outDiagf
ANRD Thr
I am testing the backup vm function available in the
tsm 6 client. The full backup option uses a staging
directory on the server. The backup is placed there
and then the regular tsm backup sends it to the
storage pools.
Can the backup vm processs send it to the storage
pools directly without sendi
Michael,
Thanks for the Monday morning laugh about Windows :)
Yudi, if you want to install Perl on your windows box and take a bite at
Michael's script; you can install Active Perl 5.10
(http://www.activestate.com/activeperl/) then you could create and run
Perl script from that "little back windo
I took a crack at playing with Michael's script and came up with this
solution. I think the original script uses fancier XTerm colors, but I've
been able to make this version work on Windows, Mac OS X 10.5, and SUSE
Linux 9. On Windows, I use CTRL-BREAK to break out of the script.
The colors I use
Wanda
If you are clueless, where does that leave the rest of us? We depend on
you to lead us out of the bowels of backups - navigating the good ship
TSM. How can we continue??? Where do we go?
Help - Richard, you are our last hope!!!
OOOHHH NN, I feel the darkness of tar cu
Unless Tivoli writes their own code to perform the VCB snapshot, I
don't see this happening. The way I understand it, the backup vm
command is calling the vmware vcbmounter etc... commands under the
covers. What you are seeing is an integration and automation of those
tools. We used to have to
Good day everyone,
I'm looking for some workable suggestions for larger lun backups.
I'm talking 1.5tb and larger lun sizes. I have a number of remote sites that
have large quantities of hi-res image files and they need an offsite backup
solution. Usually we are notified before the disks go into
I just have to say that we took a long thoughtful look at all 3,000-
odd error messages when developing Servergraph.
We decided that the I, E, and W letters are misleading.
Some messages are marked W, Warning, when they indicate really serious
problems, like dead tape drives.
Other messages are m
Duane,
You may find worthy to take a look at LAN-Free backups configurations.
This would not only alleviate the load on your bandwidth but also
decrease the backup duration.
That may or may not work for you but wouldn't hurt to look into it.
Good luck.
BERTAUT TCHUISE
TSM/NetApp Storage Adminis
Hello all
We are restoring the SYS: volume and have come across the following
error but now have the attached error. I selected "2" force overwrite on
all write protected objects.
(TSAFS.NLM 6 52.2 266) This data set is in use and cannot be accessed at
this time
File is >> File 'SYS:/tomcat/
To adminster TSM, an ID needs the tsmAdministrator or tsmUser role, these
roles are currently identical. The TSM_AdminCenter group has the
tsmAdministrator role. This is all an id needs if it is just going to be
used to administer TSM
The reportAdministrator and reportUser are Tivoli Common Repor
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:21:59 -0400, "Strand, Neil B."
>> said:
> If you are clueless, where does that leave the rest of us? We depend on
> you to lead us out of the bowels of backups
Ew.
- Allen S. Rout
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:53:52 -0500, "Ochs, Duane" said:
> I'm looking for some workable suggestions for larger lun backups.
> I'm talking 1.5tb and larger lun sizes. I have a number of remote
> sites that have large quantities of hi-res image files and they need
> an offsite backup solution.
Sumthin' wrong with those numbers.
If you have a GigE pipe, you should be able to send 70-80 MB/sec. thats
400+ MB/min, 240+ GB per hour, 4+ TB in 24 hours.
So, either
- your clients are having performance issues with their own disks
- maybe you have compression or something else slowing down th
15 matches
Mail list logo