Hi All!
Recently I tried to perform a Snapshot Image Backup on a Win2003 Sp2 cluster
node, 1.3 TB partition.
TSM Backup-Archive Client Version 5, Release 5, Level 0.4 .
During the backup,after it is almost completed , cluster commits failover to
the other node,the backup fails with error me
Hi,
what a coincidence - new info about this very problem on IBM website ... your
work?
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&dc=DB520&dc=DB560&uid=swg21296891&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en&rss=ct663tivoli
Harry
"Large, Matthew : Barclays Wealth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi Marc,
There are two ways to have some informations.
For pre-5.5 servers, you can use the REPORTRETRIEVE server option
(dsmserv.opt) which reports to ACTLOG. Look at the Administrator's
Reference about that.
With 5.5 clients, you can try the new AUDITLOGGING client option wich
reports to
Damn, that's a good service.. From officially unsupported list to official
documentation in two days. Unless another customer recently had the same
problem and raised a software call instead..
Sims has been scaring me into thinking it might be virus, but I just did a
search on the system and there
Fellows,
We have a Scalar library with LTO4 which was initially configured with the
TSM device drivers; in order to utilize the drive level encryption function
we have had to move data to a vtl, delete the devs in TSM, install the IBM
device drivers (to support drive level encryption) on Sol10 and
See IBM's information on logical library segregation and label
implications in their document 7009625.
Richard Sims
Hello
Is there an up to date recommended hardware platform doc somewhere ?
My target plateform is a Linux host on x86_64 connected to a SCSI
Library with 2 LTO 4 drives.
Regards,
Mrs
Just to summarize the answer from the technote page..
'Data is encrypted during WRITE operations, when the encryption key is passed
from the server to the drive. Data is decrypted on READ operations.'
I will not need to relabel the volumes since the label is not encrypted, just
data written in th
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Large, Matthew : Barclays Wealth wrote:
Just to summarize the answer from the technote page..
'Data is encrypted during WRITE operations, when the encryption key
is passed
from the server to the drive. Data is decrypted on READ operations.'
I will not need to relab
I have a client that wants to start using WORM tapes for specific nodes/data.
They are TSM 5.4.2.0 on Winders2003 SP2, 3494 library
and 3592 (TS1120) drives. Reading the manuals/redbooks it seems to activate
this:
- Change WORMSCRATCHCATEGORY= on the library definition
- Create a DEVCLASS with W
On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:24 AM, William Boyer wrote:
... What just isn't connecting is how does TSM know a regular
scratch tape from a WORM scratch tape? ...
Good question. The TSM manuals leave that unexplained. The redbook
"Implementing IBM Tape in Unix Systems" provides some insight...
I'm loosing the battle on this one; /opt is a directory, not a file system. I
have a backup of it on the server.
And I get this when I try to do a restore:
tsm> rest -pick -subdir=yes "/opt/"
Restore function invoked.
ANS1395E The destination filespace or drive letter is unavailable. The
follo
- Where the filespace name within a directory path is ambiguous, you
can enclose it in braces to make it clear to TSM.
- Rather than attempting the Restore command right off the bat,
utilize Query Backup first as a "restoral simulator" to test that
it's going at the right thing and will return th
I think it's complaining about the destination for the restore, not the
files you are trying to restore.
I would try specifying a temp directory as the restore target, see what
results you get.
On 3/12/08, Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Where the filespace name within a directory
Kauffman, Tom wrote:
> I'm loosing the battle on this one; /opt is a directory, not a file system. I
> have a backup of it on the server.
>
> And I get this when I try to do a restore:
>
> tsm> rest -pick -subdir=yes "/opt/"
> Restore function invoked.
>
> ANS1395E The destination filespace or dri
Yes. This seems like it will work:
tsm> rest -pick -subdir=yes "/opt/*" "/logvol/opt/"
Restore function invoked.
TSM Scrollable PICK Window - Restore
#Backup Date/TimeFile Size A/I File
1. | 12/16
I think even more simpler way is:
tsm> rest -pick -subdir=yes "/opt/*"
Shouldn't need to restore to another directory - unless you want to.
Your original restore command line had "/opt/" instead of "/opt/*".
David Longo
>>> "Kauffman, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/12/2008 3:13 PM >>>
Yes. This s
Interesting.
That works -- outside of not showing the "ibm_help" directory and contents.
Oh, crap!
I think I see what's going on . . .
The files showing in /opt are all from 2002 -- when this node was an rs-6000
running AIX and /opt was a filesystem. Looks like I need to do a bit of
deletion
.
I'm with Alan here. There are certain types of data I don't want to have
access to, not even the encryption keys. We back up some data for the
UofI Medical Center, and the HIPPA, SOCKS, and just plain lawsuit
possibilities are so mind-boggling, that I want certain types of this
data to be inacces
That was it -- I deleted the backups for /opt the filesystem from the server
and now I can see /opt the directory.
I wonder how many more of these idiot-catchers I've got lurking out there.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remco
That's kinda what I inferred from the (limited) documentation. Just wanted
confirmation.
True, until you get to 5.4 release. The the developers decided that the
MEDIATYPE column in the LIBVOLUMES table should be changed
from INTEGER to VARCHAR(16) and on my 5.4.1.0 system the Q LIBV F=D on my
T
Hi list,
I have a TSM Server 5.2.2 running on a Linux box.
There is this customer that have a business requirement of FULL backup every
day with a 30 days retension period. There are several customers attended by
this TSM Server. All of them with usual policies.
Considering that I have an IBM
Hi all,
Does anyone know about a TSM BAC version 5.2.2 that can run on a Windows 2003
64bits server?
Mario
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Mario Behring wrote:
Hi list,
I have a TSM Server 5.2.2 running on a Linux box.
There is this customer that have a business requirement of FULL
backup every day with a 30 days retension period. There are several
customers attended by this TSM Server. All of them with usual
policies.
Considerin
On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Mario Behring wrote:
...There is this customer that have a business requirement of FULL
backup every day with a 30 days retension period.
Beware customers who specify a backup requirement and nothing else.
Those are customers who haven't thought things through
Hi list,
I am trying to install TSM Client 5.2.2 on a Windows 2003 64 bits server. The
processor is a Xeon X5355 Quad-core. I am getting the following error message
when starting the installation:
"This installation package is not supported by this processor type.
Contact your product vendor."
Good point - I assume a tape error (one of those cases where TSM is doing
lots and lots of retries to read the same marginal tape) would show the
session in RUN state, not in SENDW.
I've seen this issue before when the client wasn't set to full duplex, but
then you wouldn't have gotten your 206 GB
Hi all,
How can I perform a full backup or an archive on a client that is going to be
deactivated and send the data directly to tape. There is an IBM 3583 L18 LTO2
connected to the TSM Server, with 3 drives and 18 slots.
How can I tell TSM to use a particular tape, a scratch one that will be se
Mario
Run a selective if you like, but there is no real need to. Then run a
generate backupset on the node. This will put all of the active data on to
a tape.
Print out the detail of the backupset (q backupset) and send it with the
tape to the customer.
Regards
Steve.
Steven Harris
TSM Admin
29 matches
Mail list logo
