Wiadomosc przeskanowana programem antywirusowym. Nie znaleziono wirusow /
This message was anti-virus scanned. No viruses were found.
Hi
I have problem with DB size. Now it's 114 GB (with 18 Windows Server
clients). My policy parameters are:
Version Data Exist: Nolimit
Version Data Deleted: Nolim
I am pleased to say that this works perfectly. (I have a 5.2.4 client, so the
delete backup is not an option)
Following the deletion of the dummy files, and another incremental, the
original copies of the files are discarded, in accordance with the copygroup
rules for the new mgmt class.
Thank y
Hi,
You have to go into unloading and reloading the database.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Szymon Kacprzak
Sent: donderdag 19 oktober 2006 10:18
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DB size problem
Wiadomosc prz
Are there a Windows version of this tapeutil somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Sims
Sent: den 18 oktober 2006 21:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape TTL
On Oct 18, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Mark Stapleto
I have inherited some old Windows 2000 servers to backup and have
installed TSM 5.3.3 client on for standard incremental backup. The TSM
server is 5.2.7.1.
I keep getting the following errors during the backup:
The domain statement is all-local so I thought it would do a
systemobjects whereas the
hi, i'm little lost in terminology here , if someone can shed some light on
my confusion ...
Executing scheduled command now.
10/14/06 22:42:30
Executing Operating System command or script:
su - oracle -c /db/sdb11/backup01/backup/sdb1_do_bkup.sh
10/15/06 21:25:16 Finished command. Return
Normally it is a VVS problem, Ntbackup should fail too when backuping up
Syatemstate/ASR information.
Stopping and restarting VSS service etc wont solve the problem. MS is
happy to provide som hotfixes and they will require a reboot.
Try 'vssadmin list writes' to check if some VSS writers are in er
The backup window can be extended using the dur and duru parameters of
an 'update schedule' command; use 'help update schedule' for detailed
information on the parameters.
I'm not sure if you will have problems making the window >24 hours if
the schedule is expected to run once every 24 hours thou
Hi All,
Is there any command (or) Any other way which can help us knowing the
size of data backed up?
Regards,
Srinath G
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and may contain proprie
select sum(cast(bytes/1024/1024/1024 as decimal(6,2))) GB from summary where
start_time>=current_timestamp - 24 hours and activity='BACKUP'
shows total data in gigabytes backed up in last 24 hours
peace,
goran
- Original Message -
From: "Gopinathan, Srinath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Se
Hello everyone,
I have been asked what the blocksize of the data is when it is being
transferred from disk to tape? I wasn't quite sure how to respond to this
question. Does anyone know where any documentation/information is on such
a question? Any information is appreciated! Thanks!
On Oct 19, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Gopinathan, Srinath wrote:
Is there any command (or) Any other way which can help us knowing the
size of data backed up?
In addition to Goran's suggestion, you can also inspect the ANE
client messages in the Activity Log, and process your TSM accounting
records (wh
On Oct 19, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Joni Moyer wrote:
I have been asked what the blocksize of the data is when it is being
transferred from disk to tape? I wasn't quite sure how to respond
to this
question. Does anyone know where any documentation/information is
on such
a question? Any information i
Hi!
Both source ant target-servers are 5.3.2.0, running on the same P650 machine,
AIX 5.3.0.0
I only get around 35-50 KB/s, and that is useless...
When exporting to tape from the target-server, the export runs at 20-30 MB/s,
and about the same when importing from the tape to the source-server.
Tom -
To factors which come to mind are:
- Lack of collocation can make for a lot of tape repositioning,
which, depending upon your tape technology, can be painful.
- I know from experience, watching reclamations, that tapes which
have been sitting unused for long periods of time (years)
On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Szymon Kacprzak wrote:
I have problem with DB size. Now it's 114 GB (with 18 Windows Server
clients). My policy parameters are:
Version Data Exist: Nolimit
Version Data Deleted: Nolimit
Retain Extra Ver.: 7
Retain Only Ver.: 7
Your backup retentions are tiny, so o
Hi all,
I just got the HSM for Windows ...
I want to install it on my file server... its a Windows 2000 server in a
cluster environnement.
I cannot make it work for the cluster drive ... it works only for the
local drive of my server. ...
Is there any option or config that I have to do to mak
Anybody out there in IBM-land got a dont-hold-me-to-this estimation of
wether and when we might expect subfile backup on unix clients? Is it
dependant on filepath stability?
- Allen S. Rout
- Bleeding from the mouth and filepath.
One of my clients has decided to back up all files every night, instead of
performing an incremental backup, so I have multiple identical copies of
ancient files and old versions of files are rapidly overwritten by multiple
copies of the current version.
I'm using the BA Client and all my client m
The client does not decide on its own to back up all files every night.
Something else is almost certainly triggering that behavior.
Likely possibilities: someone changed a copy group's MODE setting (on the
TSM server) to ABSOLUTE (though that could affect all nodes belonging to
that policy), or s
I'm setting up TSM to replace an existing backup setup. The existing
setup uses software based tape mirroring, and we'd like to continue
doing something similar.
I would rather avoid real tape mirroring, so I can do collocation on the
on-site pool, and no collocation on the off-site pool. Basical
Hmmm. It's only apparent on this one server and they all share the same
policy. I'll check if any big security changes have happened.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 16:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Odd cl
Yes there is a way to do write to two tapes simultaneously: one primary
and one copy. Use the copystg parameter on the primary pool to set
this. This action behaves with respect to the collocation parameter on
each pool. So if the primary pool is collocated and the copy is not,
the correct thing
At this time, I am not aware of any such plans. As to whether filepath
would be a part of the picture, I do not know.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Kelly Lipp wrote:
> Yes there is a way to do write to two tapes simultaneously: one primary
> and one copy. Use the copystg parameter on the primary pool to set
> this. This action behaves with respect to the collocation parameter on
> each pool. So if the primary pool is collocated and the copy
the client may be running an explicit 'selective' backup, forcing the
backup of all files.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/19/06 11:00 AM >>>
One of my clients has decided to back up all files every night, instead
of
performing an incremental backup, so I have multiple identical copies
of
ancient files a
I seem to be having trouble with the correct syntax for defining the
domain under the client option sets. I have nodes defined for window's os
that I just want to backup system objects, c: and d: drives. I have other
nodes defined for the e: and f: drives. I tried c: d: systemobject
system
Skylar,
In our systems, we backup stg first and then migrate so we know we have
one done before the other. In your case, you synchronize theses
processes (our STORServer Manager product does this for you) by creating
scripts.
I guess I don't really worry too much about a tape failure before the
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Skylar Thompson wrote:
Is there a way to guarantee that data is backed up to a copy tape pool
before being migrated to the primary tape pool? We want to avoid any
tape-to-tape transfers before we have two known-good copies that we can
recover from.
Note that you can enable
Hi,
Define a script:
Backup stg diskpoolX copypoolX wait=yes
Backup stg tapepoolX copypoolX wait=yes
Migrate stg diskpoolX
Define an admin schedule to run the script.
If your diskpool is large enough to hold at least one day of backup
data, you can turn on caching and always have the latest back
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Skylar Thompson wrote:
Kelly Lipp wrote:
Yes there is a way to do write to two tapes simultaneously: one
primary
and one copy. Use the copystg parameter on the primary pool to set
this. This action behaves with respect to the collocation
parameter on
each pool. S
Part of answer is how I have my dsm.opt setup, with comments
on Windows versions below:
*
* Options file examples:
*
* DOMAIN depends on what OS and what you want to backup.
* To backup everything, just use "ALL-LOCAL"
* To backup o
At 10:53 AM 10/18/2006, Bos, Karel wrote:
So, we need an extra table containing all volumes at any point defined
in ITSM containing at least date_first_used, #mounts, #errors,
#write_passes and current_state. Or something like that.
Something along these lines would do the trick. I agree that
Hello,
At the begining of the next year, this version will support MSCS clusters.
you can use this version, it is posible you solve the pb.
http://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r3/Windows/x32/v534/HSM/
On the other hand, the HSM client is cluster tole
Hi,
the block size is 256 in TSM Server 5.3 and 64 in the other TSM versions.
- Mensaje original
De: Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Enviado: jueves, 19 de octubre, 2006 13:51:41
Asunto: Block size of data when written to tape?
Hello everyone,
I have been as
Kelly Lipp wrote:
> Skylar,
>
> In our systems, we backup stg first and then migrate so we know we have
> one done before the other. In your case, you synchronize theses
> processes (our STORServer Manager product does this for you) by creating
> scripts.
>
> I guess I don't really worry too much
Does anyone know if COMMTIMEOUT is a dynamic variable? I would like to
change it but I am not sure if I need to restart TSN for it to take
effect.
Thanks for your help!!
Regards,
Nicholas Rodolfich
Systems Analyst
POOLCORP
Desk: (985)801-3038
Cell: (228)223-6777
mailto:[EMAI
> Does anyone know if COMMTIMEOUT is a dynamic variable? I would like to
> change it but I am not sure if I need to restart TSN for it to take
> effect.
I believe SETOPT will change COMMTIMEOUT dynamically.
anker
In that environment, then, what does it all mean? You never have all of
your files backed up into any one location at any one time anyway! So
it becomes a point-in-time thing: at this point in time, everything is
as good as it can possibly be...
For Windows clients, try the journaling option. T
hello,
Can anyone refer me to some good books or links on Tivoli commands?
I understand IBM site themselves have some reference to it , but the query
commands are not quite enough to do what I would like to do, may be I need
to find more information about complex query . I appreciate if anyo
Kelly Lipp wrote:
> > In that environment, then, what does it all mean? You never have all of
> > your files backed up into any one location at any one time anyway! So
> > it becomes a point-in-time thing: at this point in time, everything is
> > as good as it can possibly be...
> >
> > For Wind
Been there, done that.
- Advantage of building your own pool is that you can expand it whenever you
want just by adding disk.
CDL's on the market mostly have an upper limit on the TB they support.
- You'll need to pre-allocate the volumes as mentioned before, but that's easy
if you use the ne
42 matches
Mail list logo
