Hi SMers,
I picked up this message last night after a scheduled event failed, but
I was not expecting to read what I read:
06-09-2005 17:43:33 ANR1639I Attributes changed for node CHEETAH: TCP
Address from 172.17.40.228 to 172.17.44.56. (SESSION: 3310)
06-09-2005 17:43:42 ANR0403I Session 3310 end
Many thanks Del,
although it is a little poor information for our Exchange admin :-). I gues
that only way is to do complete Exchange restore on separate machine into
primary storge group, is it?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Del
Hi matthew,
ANR1639I indicates that the TSM server found that the client
node connected to the TSM server with a different IP address than it did
before. This does not affect operation, however it may affect accounting
depending on how accounting is performed for this node.
Do u have
Hi Sandeep,
We don't use accounting at the moment so we are not affected by that.
My question is why, if TSM updated the attributes after it noticed they
had changed, did it not attempt to communicate to the client over the
new TCP address? If it had it might not have failed to perform the
backup
hi all,
we added D52 frame with 6 LTO3 drives and 220 LTO3 tapes,
in frame 1 there is 226 LTO1 tapes and 12 LTO1 drives
all went fine, except automatic microcode downgrade on
new frame which resulted into configuration failure coz firmware
on frame 1 was old enough (3480) not to recognize D52 fram
Hi Goran,
Yes, you need to do label libvolume on new tapes. You can use volume without
sticky label in TSM, but not without "magnetic label" on tape. I think that
error you got during labeling is not TSM problem, it seems like drive-tape
comaptibility problem. What is element 261, is it drive? If
May be it tries to read/checks the client option file ( dsm.opt or what
ever u have specified)associated to schedular while defining tsm client
schedular , it may have kept those entries in database,
despite of this message I feel that urs backup was successful..
-Original Message-
From:
I have done a fair amount of BMR's in the past and not always to similar
hardware. I'm not sure if this is relevant to you, but here's my euro's
worth anyway.
After installing the vanilla OS and then Service Pack'ing it to the
level of the original machine that you are trying to restore, I make a
Ah, I think I'm looking for an 'official' answer - the node was
contacted using the Server Prompted option, TSM found a new TCP address,
at this point I would have expected TSM to record the new TCP address
against the node, and to use the new address in future contacts, not the
old one.
The back
ok, i did some label libvolume and it started okay , but it did just 4
volumes and then crashed again with :
ANR8300E I/O error on library LTO_LIB01 (OP=6C03, CC=404, KEY=05,
ASC=30, ASCQ=00,
SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00.00.0A.00.00.00.00.3-
0.00.00.C0.00.06.,
Description=Media incompatibility)
By my means you need to separate both technologies LTO1 and LTO3 and avoid
mix mounts. You need to define different library, device class and stgpools
in TSM for LTO3 drives and put these drives (and paths) into that library.
Than label (and checkin) LTO3 tapes only into this library. Now, if you u
Hi Tom,
Yes. In order to restore a public folder, you need to restore
it into the a storage group that has the same name, either
to the original server or to an alternate server.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 09/07/2005
03:
why should it not push a lto3 tape into a lto1 drive? (seen from tsm).
How would tsm know what kind of tape you are trying to label?
One way to solve your problem is to partition your library. Lto1 in one
partition and lto3 in another.
This makes sense if you want to keep on using the lto1 dri
hi, thanks for answering
but.
i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Generation 1 drive cannot support LTO Ultrium Generation 2
media. For this reason, you cannot mix Ultrium Generation 1 and Ultrium
Generation 2 media in a storage pool that shares both Ultrium Generation
On Sep 7, 2005, at 3:28 AM, Large, M (Matthew) wrote:
Hi SMers,
I picked up this message last night after a scheduled event failed,
but
I was not expecting to read what I read:
06-09-2005 17:43:33 ANR1639I Attributes changed for node CHEETAH: TCP
Address from 172.17.40.228 to 172.17.44.56. (SES
What is the storage pool's COLLOCATE value set to?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The c
Bill Boyer reported a similar problem on this list a couple of weeks ago.
He said he had a PMR open with IBM and had not been resolved:
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg60289.html
I think you should call support.
If you get an answer for sure, please let us know.
It's not clea
Are there also backups running during this period, If the diskpool doesn't
have enough space, or a client has files that exceed the diskpools
maxsize then some of your backups could be using the extra tapes.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
We are planning a project to migrate from veritas netbackup on solaris
to tsm (on aix).
Does someone know if it is possible to import veritas tapes to
tsm-archives? Or to read veritas tapes directly into the tsm database
somehow.
I think we end up restoring and archiving again but some work arou
No, there is no migration path for data from Veritas directly to TSM.
You will either have to keep your Veritas installation in place, or retrieve
the files to a staging server and re-archive them into TSM.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Office 262.521.5627
I have a PMR open with Tivoli also and have gotten similar
answer to Bill's. No clear explanation why, though.
Part of answer was "the media is seen the same for both LTO1
and LTO3 drives". Huh?
I am still doing research and testing myself - when I have time!
David B. Longo
System Administrat
Hi,
I don't think that TSM uses only 1 tape per collocgroup when you have
set maxpr=3. What if only data of one collocgroup is on the diskpool?
TSM would waste resources.
If you turn collocation=none for the tape pool than TSM also uses three
tapes at a time.
Volker
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.200
I got an answer, if not a resoution, to my problem. It only had to do with
mixed drives when there is only 1 of a specific type. My
library has 3 LTO-1 drives and 1 LTO-3 drive. If I would have had 2 LTO-3
drives, I wouldn't have had any problems. And right now I
can't find the reply. The APAR wa
The problem I had was trying to do a move data from and LTO-1 tape to an LTO-3.
The process would sit In waiting for mountpoint in
devclass LTO3, even though the drive was available. Tivoli support (actually
the developers) said that was something in the device
allocation algorithm and was not an
On Sep 7, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Goran wrote:
...i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Generation 1 drive cannot support LTO Ultrium
Generation 2
media. For this reason, you cannot mix Ultrium Generation 1 and
Ultrium
Generation 2 media in a storage pool that shares both Ultri
Hi *SM'ers,
I just installed the tsm-client 530 for Linux-i386 and tried
dsmj -virtualnode=some_node
I don't know wether I'm doing a mistake with resp. of a wrong calling or
the writers of "dsmj" ignored any possible former options, e.g. working
in the 5.2.+ client.
Hope for some help.
See IBM Technote 1197286.
Richard Sims
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Peter Duempert wrote:
Hi *SM'ers,
I just installed the tsm-client 530 for Linux-i386 and tried
dsmj -virtualnode=some_node
I don't know wether I'm doing a mistake with resp. of a wrong
calling or
the writers of "ds
Hi Karin,
Is this a new TSM server, and did you run the admin command SET
ARCHIVERETENTIONPROTECTION ON? If not, then that would probably explain
the situation.
There is also a redbook about the
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/SG247091.html that talks about the
IBM TotalStorage DR550, b
I have a very large client whose one filespace now exceeds all available
disk space, so the backup goes directly to tape. The DIRMC option points
to a diskpool. However, since redirecting the backups to tape, the
directories are going directly to tape too. That means write the
directories on ta
We have 2 libraries that use 3590 tapes, one mainframe and one UNIX. The
problem arises when an operator puts a non-UNIX tape in my library it will
check in that tape and make it available for use. I want to know if I can
prevent this with the use of one of the following parameters: VOLRange or
VOL
I realize there isn't a TSM Solaris x86 client, and probably won't be in
the future (?), however I've heard that the Linux client will work. Has
anyone been able to setup/use the Linux client for Solaris 10 x86? If so,
what are the details in getting it working? I have a bunch of clients
wanting
Over the weekend part of the computer room lost power, thanks for it being
the TSM server. I have lots of disk issues but at the moment I just want to
get the library connection working.
The TSM server was upgraded to AIX 5.2 and the Tivoli.tsm.devices.aix5.rte
installed and the old file removed
Add a volrange=A0,A9 to your checkin command and it will only checkin
the Ax tapes and leave anything else in INSERT status.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/05 3:25 PM >>>
We have 2 libraries that use 3590 tapes, one mainframe and one UNIX. The
problem arises when an operator puts a non-U
What kind of library? If it uses atldd, did you reinstall that software?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/05 3:54 PM >>>
Over the weekend part of the computer room lost power, thanks for it being
the TSM server. I have lots of disk issues but at the moment I just want to
get the library connection wor
Server
TSM 5.2.2.5 running on AIX 5.2
NIM master
TSM4SBR 5.6.5.0
Client
AIX 5.2
TSM Client 5.2.2.14 (or whatever is fairly recent in the 5.2.2.x range)
TSM4SBR 5.6.5.0
I have been successful creating the TSM4SBR System Image backup of the
"Client" to the virtual TSM device, and verified that th
Does anyone have a select or query command to list copy pool tapes that
are in the library only.
Office: 281-871-5502 | Mobile: 713-471-1844
--
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
pri
We use a similar short cut method that we've found works 95% of the time. We
just copy out the hal.dll and notoskrnl.exe. We then run the restore (catalog,
C:\ and systemstate). After the restore and before the reboot we copy the
hal.dll and ntoskrnl.exe back.
Then we reboot, if the system
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Louvier
>Does anyone have a select or query command to list copy pool tapes that
>are in the library only.
q drm * wherest=mountable
(This will include any TSM db backups still in the library)
q vol stgp= access=read
Dear All,
I am running TSM 5.2.3 on Windows 2003 with 3582 Library with 2 drives.
Ultrium2 tapes with 200GB space.
Daily incremental backup of about 5GB.
I have setup a copypool to which i backup my primary pool daily. The plan file
(after running prepare) has ever increasing tapes required for
Hi Sandra,
I'm sure you'll get plenty of advice and suggestions from others, but here
are my "two cents":
Once concern right off the bat is the reuse delay of zero, which puts at
risk your goal of 100% restore capability of up to 4 days ago. Instead,
your reuse delay should be the same as your db
Hmmm thanks andy,
I have changed the reuse delay to 4, that is the same as dbbackup expiration
days.
Ok..i have to have two copy storage pools both having a complete and separate
set of tapes. From this i understand that everytime the stgpool backup is
performed, there is no way to tell TSM tha
Kyle, Leigh,
Thanks for your input, I really appreciate ! I tried several methods to
restore this client, carefully following your recommendations :
unfortunately none of them worked 100 %... The machine came up again,
but with some parts of the software not usable anymore ...
Every time I tried t
42 matches
Mail list logo
