Hi to all
I want to export nodes from one server to another one don't have server to server
connection , I have 19 nodes ( on 39 DLT cartridges) my output server is on SDLT
cartridges , the amount of data is around 1 Tera.
Can anybody give me an estimation of time to export and import those nod
Hello List!
Can anyone give some links about the subject?
Or maybe some quick hints from experts?
One important factor will be the distribution of the data across the
cartridges. If it is very intermixed the export time will be
significantly longer than it would be if the data were collocated, for
example.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/SMAIXN/GC32-0768-02/en_US/HTML/a
nragd522tfrm.htm
Chapter 23 is about using disaster recovery manager. This is a usefull
read and a place to start if you are onsiting / offsiting tape volumes.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [
As the quickfacts say, this is nearly always network configuration
issues. We were seeing them recently and traced the problem back to a
pair of etherchanneled 1gbit adapters, and the configuration of the
switch ports they were attatched to.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
A stab in the dark, but is the O/S killing the process because of
resource limits?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Backup strange messa
Y'know, I'd never thought of doing it like that! I tend to get my
scripts to query TSM and extract the nodenames and loop through them.
Never clicked that I could use select that way!
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Maza
Also, has the MAXSCRATCH limit for the next stgpool been hit?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bill Dourado
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DISK POOL
.have you tried :
>Y'know, I'd never thought of doing it like that! I tend to get my
>scripts to query TSM and extract the nodenames and loop through them.
>Never clicked that I could use select that way!
>
>Matt.
A good practice, Matt. Most of the commands accept wildcards only for queries:
for changes, the comma
Within my TSM server there are many GB of disk pool allocated, but
the morning report this morning shows only 16.4% utilization (this
is generated from TSM Operational Reporting). Is this value meaning
what is allocated at the moment of the report (items in the disk
pool that are not yet migrated t
>Can anyone give some links about the subject?
>
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/SMAIXN/GC32-0768-02/en_US/PDF/anragd522.pdf
>Or maybe some quick hints from experts?
Use DRM.
There was one question that I will comment on below.
I don't need to address the others since Mark answered
them brilliantly.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/18/2004
12:07:53 PM:
>.
>.
>
> One document I
It will be indicating the current utilization of the diskpool. IE; the
amount of space within the diskpool that is currently occupied by TSM
data.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:51 PM
To:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
> It will be indicating the current utilization of the diskpool. IE; the
> amount of space within the diskpool that is currently occupied by TSM
> data.
>
> Matt.
Is there a way to find the max utilization during the night?
Mike
My Linux guru checked the ulimit values and said it was pretty much
unlimited !
What would I check ? How would I check it ? What is the realistic limit
?
I do know that when we navigated down the suspected filesystem dir and did
backups of individual sub-sub-dirs, the file counts were in the 5
I have some issues/questions with this suggestion !
Can I assume you really ment something more reasonable like 500MB not 5GB,
since our mailbox limits are usually under 300MB ! ?
I still don't/won't have enough disk space to handle something like this !
The backup stream would overrun the disk
Anyone out there backing up an iPlanet application server running on Solaris
9 with TSM? I have a client that is installing this and they want to use
their current TSM envirnment to back it up.
TSM server is 5.1.7.1 on Windows2000.
Solaris client would be the latest available...
Bill Boyer
"An Op
But this will delete everything on the volume correct? Is there a way to be specific
other than perhaps using the Expiration option?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Amos Hagay
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 4:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
>Can I assume you really ment something more reasonable like
>500MB not 5GB, since our mailbox limits are usually under 300MB ! ?
It depends upon what you mean by "reasonable". I've got a customer that
sets
Hi everybody,
I am facing a weird AUDIT command behavior.
I run TSM 5.1.8 server on AIX4.3 and have two ultrium libraries 3583 and
3584 connected to the machine. Everything was good until suddenly 3583
library failed. Only reboot of aix plus switching power off for that
library helped. Now library
where there any tapes in use at the time?
I have a vague recollection of this ...
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/19/04 02:04PM >>>
Hi everybody,
I am facing a weird AUDIT command behavior.
I run TSM 5.1.8 server on AIX4.3 and have two ultrium libraries 3583 and
3584 connected to the machine. Everything
You can not run audit lib while any other process or session is using
tapes. Might that be your problem?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/19/2004 2:04:08 PM >>>
Hi everybody,
I am facing a weird AUDIT command behavior.
I run TSM 5.1.8 server on AIX4.3 and have two ultrium libraries 3583
and
3584 connecte
Hi again
Is a full backup enought or I should take a backup of the log too ??
Is there any settings to look at in the DSM.OPT for SQL ??
"Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-08-18 12:34 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Yes, that was the case. I killed all processes and dismount all tapes.
Only after that it started to work. But I remember that in previous
versions audit gave a message to remove tapes from the drives.
Thank you for you help.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAI
Over the last weekend we had a tape get stuck in a drive and threw the drive
offline, no big deal, right? This happens enough that we know how to deal
with it, but... this is the first time that this has happened (in my limited
three years experience) in that the stuck tape was a scratch tape. This
I understand your point but my issue is that I have to make it work with
what I have. Being short of resources is a fact-of-life for me.
It is going to have to go directly-to-tape. Now way around it. I am just
trying to figure out how to make it perform, the best.
Besides, I don't think it is rea
Just use the upd libv command to change the status from scratch to private.
TSM will skip that tape and go on to the next scratch tape.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Bertrand
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL
Luc,
Is a full backup "enough" for what?
A Data Protection for SQL "FULL" backup can be used to
restore a complete database. When a full backup is
taken it also captures pieces of the log that it needs
to fully recover the database. You do not need a
separate "LOG" backup in order to perform a da
28 matches
Mail list logo
