Hi
Is it possible to predefine a backup job, which the user have to start by
himself. First, I don't want to use server schedules because they have be
started at a certain time and some users are not satisfied with that.
Second I don't want the user to select which files to backup every time.
Basi
Can't comment on offsite reclamation, because cross site tape capability
means all reclamation is onsite, but in my environment TSM only selects
tapes marked full as reclamation candidates.
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@vm.marist.edu> on 02/04/2004 08:48:24 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist
Hello all,
I want to restore database, but RMAN always restores database that was backup lastly.
Could you show me the method to backup database that I want ?
( Example : Database's backupset is 78)
Thanks, Nghiatd
P/S : I use TDP backup for Oracle
Hi Neil!
What I tried is issuing a select * from backups where node_name='NODE1' and
hl_name='//' and backup_date < '2003-01-01'.
This query took about 20 minutes, but it was successful.
I guess I'm going to issue it for all Oracle related nodes one by one.
Thank you VERY much for your help!
Kindes
Hi Thomas!
The problem is that these nodes all running old TDP versions and they cannot
be upgraded easily.
Anyway, TDPOSYNC wouldn't help me here either, because it only removes
objects from TSM when there are no entries for those objects in the recovery
catalog and for a lot of them there are!
Ou
Dea listers,
Funny problem on w2k clusterservice.
02/05/2004 12:15:35 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\nt3000896\d$' failed
02/05/2004 12:15:35 ANS1063E Invalid path specification
02/05/2004 12:15:37 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'TEST' failed. Return code =
12.
My opt file:
NODENAMENT3
Hi,
its is perfect possible using the command line client.
The simplest command to start is
"dsmc incr"
or, if you would prefer to offer more classical way of backup,
"dsmc arch d:\path\*"
You probably want your users only have clicked on an icon,
so you can prepare one pointing to
You need to go back and review my prior post on this subject. The proposed
configuration will yield undesirable results.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi all,
we are trying to do a db2 incremental restore through TSM.
We managed to make a full backup and an incremental backup on a databse.
The restore of the full database backup is also working.
Our problem is the restore of the incremental backup.
The restore commend is succesfull, but, in
Hi ALL
Need info if I am using server to server functionality.
I have got a primary server for primary data and a secondary server for the copy pools.
My question is, if i lose my primary server, how would I bring up the secondary( COPY
TAPES/DISK ) online
to act as the primary server.
If any
Ok, I have only been working on TSM 'forever', but one thing still eludes me
(at least one thing :)
Question:
When trying to use excludes from an option set, do these get processed
before or after the ones
in the dsm.opt file? Or do they get processed at all if there are any in
the dsm.opt file?
This is just a quick and dirty description:
Set up the second server to work on different TCP Ports. save the
primary servers DB on the second server. Have space for the db + log
for primary server available on the second server and use the
dsmserv.opt, dsmserv.dsk ... of the primary server to res
>When trying to use excludes from an option set, do these get processed
>before or after the ones
>in the dsm.opt file? Or do they get processed at all if there are any in
>the dsm.opt file?
Jack - See Admin Guide topic "Managing Client Option Files" which explains
the order of processing
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:06:42 -0600
"Redell, Greg S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if you were going to open holes in a firewall, what ports would you
> open for the data to go through? Given that statement about the client
> source port, you could not definitively say what port it is going to
>
Hi Gang, wish I could repay you guys for all your help you have given me
in the past, but once again, need some help please.
We have just upgraded our NetWare servers to 6.5. In the process, we
are also upgrading the TSM client to 5.2.2. The backups seem to be
running ok, but I am getting a "Sytem
Hi,
For those interested, I've put a new version of my patch for tapeutil
inline. It is for tapeutil-1.58 and includes a new command to read out
the MAM of a cartridge and a command to show the block limits of a device.
See http://www.mesa.nl (follow the download link).
For those without a compile
Mark,
We are running 6.0 and 5.2.2, but by the looks of things, these are just open files
that are held by the operating system. A lot of them are log files. The ZenWorks
stuff is something that you can probably exclude, at least those file types in that
directory (as I've done. It's tempora
From: JOEL LOVELIEN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are running 6.0 and 5.2.2, but by the looks of things, these are just open files
that are held by the operating system. A lot of them are log files. The ZenWorks
stuff is something that you can probably exclude, at least those file types in that
Running TSM 5.1.5.4 on IBM H70 AIX 5.1.3 with Scalar100 (4 LTO1 drives).
Client is W2K 5.1.5. TSM Server has fiber GIG connection to a Cisco 4506
and the client has a copper Intel GIG NIC into the same switch. Networking
in not a bottleneck. Everything on the server looks good. The robot pulls
the
02/04/2004 23:41:02 ANS1369W Session Rejected: The session was canceled by
the server administrator.
I am getting this some servers. This was not canceled by an individual. Is
there some explaination as to why this is occuring?
TIA ... JC
From: Roger Nadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running TSM 5.1.5.4 on IBM H70 AIX 5.1.3 with Scalar100 (4 LTO1 drives).
Client is W2K 5.1.5. TSM Server has fiber GIG connection to a Cisco 4506
and the client has a copper Intel GIG NIC into the same switch. Networking
in not a bottleneck. Everything
I've seen this when a process with a higher priority starts. E.g. a
STGPOOL BACKUP was cancelled by a DB BACKUP.
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel
Consultant
IBM CATE, TSM Certified Consultant
"Coats, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[
>02/04/2004 23:41:02 ANS1369W Session Rejected: The session was canceled by
>the server administrator.
>
>I am getting this some servers. This was not canceled by an individual. Is
>there some explaination as to why this is occuring?
When you experience session errors, you need to look at both e
We are using Groupwise 5.5 and TSM client 5.1.5. I don't have many problems backing
up the databases at all. Our PO's run in client/server mode only. The only problems
I have are with some of the temporary files bouncing around the file system.
DSMERROR.LOG does not show any errors, and DSMS
DRM server to server functionality is really just electronic vaulting; the
secondary TSM server cannot just "take over" from the primary.
The primary server's data base is the ONLY one with the information/metadata
that is required to restore data from the copy pool tapes.
So you have to somehow
A tape goes from Pending status to Empty Status after the re-use delay
period is up. What process or command triggers the status change from
Pending to Empty, i.e. what causes the tsm server to go check all the
tapes in pending status to see if their re-use delay period is up?
David
there is a problem with the client 5.2.2 and the NLM from NW
In late December and early January we were having the same problem
After working with IBM and Novell, the NW people installed a service pac
the service pac that the NW people installed had these NLMs
TSAFS.NLM v 6.50.06 December 4,
Sure.
Use the command line version of the TSM client, dsmc.
Put it in a .bat file with a shortcut on the Windows desktop.
We call ours "one-button backup", and it's a .bat file with these contents:
--
>A tape goes from Pending status to Empty Status after the re-use delay
>period is up. What process or command triggers the status change from
>Pending to Empty, i.e. what causes the tsm server to go check all the
>tapes in pending status to see if their re-use delay period is up?
David - "You Do
Hello everybody,
I need some info regarding the performances of a TSM on AIX urgent ,if any of u could
help , because i'm experiencing some problems.
I've installed TSM 5.2 on a AIX box (5.1 64 bits) and left all the default parameters
.
The performances over a Gbit network are poor , backups
Which ML are you at on AIX?
Which version of TMS 5.2.0.0?
What vmtune settings do you have? (if any)
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Madalina Cozea
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
What is ur NIC speed set to. Did u enable or change MTU if yes set it back
to 1500 .Since 9000 needs to be changed on Switch also .It depends kind of
engine u have on CISCO switch.
Thanks
Balanand Pinni
-Original Message-
From: Madalina Cozea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, Febr
And what sort of data. One file of 4 GB or 2 000 000 files and 4 GB in
total?
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ben Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 5 februari 2004 18:20
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: TSM 5.2 performances on AIX 5.1
Which ML are
It was a kind of mixed i think (not very small files any way - exe & big DB
files), anyway ...for a single file 300MB it took 30 seconds. it seems a
poor performance to me.
The OS is in the state it came preinstalled , no patch added (right now i
cannot look for the ML), no params changed .
Same to
Ahh, so this is a fresh install.
The suggestions about checking out the NIC and switch
configurations are a good.
I suggest doing an FTP between the 2 hosts to see if your issues
are at the OS or TSM level. If your FTP is about as slow as TSM backups,
then it is likely th
Given all this, is anyone aware of any issues with Netware 6.0 SP4 and
the 5.1 or 5.2 clients?
Our Netware folks are getting ready to push SP4 out and this latest
round of posts has them a little nervous. The majority of nodes are
running Client 5.1.5.15.
as always, thanks!
Bill Fitzgerald wrote
Hi Madalina,
unfortunately no one is going to be to tune your servers through email. Your issue is
that AIX and TSM all have the default settings. I don't think anyone should be
surprised that is not optimal.
What you need to do is establish a perf and tuning methodology. Establish a base line
I was hit by this when I switched to gigabit. Took some work with my
network guys & IBM to get all the settings correct. The performance
difference was incredible.
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail:
A ftp for a the file 300MB on the same network was done twice as fast (15
seconds instead of 30 as in TSM case )
thanks for the suggestions on checking the network .
Are any parameters in dsmserv.opt that have to be changed ? I was allways
installing with the default.
And in OS ... i don't know wha
Try /usr/samples/kernel/vmtune -P 10 this will improve free memory or reduce
pageing if any.
On network side try:
no -o udp_pmtu_discover=0
no -o tcp_pmtu_discover=0
no -o ipforwarding=0
no -o tcp_ttl=120
no -o tcp_mssdflt=1448
no -o tcp_sendspace=65536
no -o tcp_recvspace=65536
no -o udp_sendspac
i'll try tomorrow changing some settings in OS and checking the network .
Thanks for giving some ideas to start with .
Mada
Also, ITSM folks had various "Technical Exchange" web seminars. Many of
them addressed Performance Tuning in both the SERVER and CLIENT areas,
including recommended settings for things like TCPIP !
I saved the PPT/PDF files from these sessons, if you or anyone is
interested in them. Some of the
I need a way to estimate the size of a storage pool backup.
Looked through the database specs, but just don't see it.
Any help is appreciated. A pointer to a manual section is fine.
Gary Lee
Senior Operating Systems Analyst
Ball State University
phone 765-285-1310
Hi Gary,
See the Reedbook of IBM TSM Implementation Guide. There you can
see how to size storage pools, database, recovery log, number of
tapes...
Tks,
_
Dan Carlo Freitas Peres
IBM Certified Deployment Professional TSM
Net Control - Gerenciamento de
>I need a way to estimate the size of a storage pool backup.
You mean, like, the Preview option?
Just thought I'd mention...
There have been observations that viewing PDFed manuals online is a drudge,
making one want to keep hardcopies of TSM manuals to flip through to quickly
get to information. Having had only hardcopy manuals my first 20 years in
data processing, I understand.
I've been
I agree on the speed issue.
Adobe Acrobat 6 is a joke. The FIND processes is ridiculous, making you
have to use the mouse, whether you like it or not (under V5, you used to
be able to repeatedly do a CTRL-F to either find again or change the
search value. Now a CTRL-F brings up the annoying "find
To *,
I have a Sun OS 5.8 / TSM 5.2 client exhibiting strange behavior. All non-system
volume groups (VGs) are not getting backed up with a "regular" incremental, TSM
sees the directory mount point but that's it, nothing except for the directory
stub gets backed up. All files associated with the
Try ctrl-g for "find again".
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 2/5/2004 13:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Viewing PDF manuals online
I agree on the spe
We installed the new stand-alone TSM console on a Win2K pro system and had
no problems getting the Operational Reporter to generate the default dailiy
report. Displays fine in the MMC console window.
We installed the TSM console on another Win2K pro system; set it up the same
way. When we try to
Last week, I added a fourth frame onto our 3584, along with 4 new LTO2
tape drives. I have not defined the new drives in TSM yet, because I'm
still trying to find out the best way to run in a mixed LTO1-LTO2
environment.
I've read that in version 5.2.X you do not have to logically partition
your
>Adobe Acrobat 6 is a joke. The FIND processes is ridiculous, making you
>have to use the mouse, whether you like it or not (under V5, you used to
>be able to repeatedly do a CTRL-F to either find again or change the
>search value. Now a CTRL-F brings up the annoying "find pane").
Shift over one k
We are in the midst of replacing our existing 3590J cartridges with 3590J
cartridges that have been (supposedly) upgraded to allow 20/40 gigabyte
capacity instead of of 10/20 capacity. I can successfully checkin the new
libvolumes but until they actually get used, I have no way of even guessing
how
Thank you (and Richard) for the CTRL-G hint. However, that wasn't what I
meant.
Under V5, I could CTRL-F to START a FIND, REPEAT the FIND, CLOSE the FIND
window with an ESC, bring the FIND window back up and type in a NEW search
string with CTRL-F.
Now we get the SLOW FIND PANE that then scrunch
On Friday, Feb 6, 2004, at 06:14 Australia/Sydney, Lee, Gary D. wrote:
I need a way to estimate the size of a storage pool backup.
Looked through the database specs, but just don't see it.
Any help is appreciated. A pointer to a manual section is fine.
Is something like "backup stg source dest pr
Hi,
We using ADSM and RMAN to backup our databases. I've run across a tuning
recommendation dependent on max_io_size. AIX does not appear to have this parameter,
though it has been suggested that maxpgahead may provide similar information. Does
anyone have information on correlation of thes
Can any body tell me how to find out the MAX_IO_SIZE in solaris?
===
Answer:
===
The "maxphys" kernel parameter limits the max. I/O size in the SCSI layer.
Default is 128k.
The "vol_maxio" kernel parameter limits the max. I/O size in the VxVM layer
(if installed). Default
Hello Balanand,
There is no parameter per se in Solaris 8 & 9 (the ones that I use). But
there are several parameters in Solaris that relate to # of bytes which can
be read in a single I/O call.
The maxphys kernel parameter limits I/O in the SCSI layer within the kernel.
Default is 128k.
We are
>We are in the midst of replacing our existing 3590J cartridges with 3590J
>cartridges that have been (supposedly) upgraded to allow 20/40 gigabyte
>capacity instead of of 10/20 capacity. I can successfully checkin the new
>libvolumes but until they actually get used, I have no way of even guessing
59 matches
Mail list logo