Hi guys,
I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library
and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be
stored on it.
Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the
pool has empty tape
Hi list,
W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v 5.00.2195 SP 3) using
a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup consistently finishes with status "failed",
and following message can be found in dsmerror.log :
07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while
Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool.
You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving
node data.
Regards,
Zosi Noriega
-Original Message-
From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 P
Thanks Kenny, that did it. Still trying to figure out what caused it.
-Original Message-
From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown
You might want to check the defined path as well. They
I was having this problem with IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an IBM 3583 library
until I upgraded the firmware for the drives and the library itself. And the
RMU for good measure.
I didn't find out what the original problem was.
Regards,
Steve Rivers
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bertrand [ma
Mark,
We had a similar issue with our W2K Library clients. The way around
it is to either reboot the server or use NTUTIL to close the drives. the
issue is a scsi reserve has been set on these drives therefore now they are
back online they have the reserve still in place which will not allow
Hi,
try
exclude.dir *:\documents*
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Markus Veit
Hi Lee
I have been asking the same question, and here what's come up:
There is no roadmap since we have no plans at this time to implement this.
I would recommend that you or any other customers interested in TSM
support for Novell GroupWise (or for any new feature, for that matter)
open a requ
Hi all
I've been restoring some data on a NetWare Cluster... and I have had several problems
doing this:
The TSM Server is a 5.1.6.2 on a AIX 4.3.3.
Client software, NetWare 6, SP3 and TSM Client 5.1.6.0.
Problem:
Every time I tried to start a restore on the cluster, the following happened:
-
>W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v
>5.00.2195 SP 3) using a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup
>consistently finishes with status "failed", and following message can be
>found in dsmerror.log :
>
>07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while proce
...
>On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node
>(NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds.
...
Sounds like your server COMMTimeout value is unrealistically low
for major client operations.
Richard Sims, BU
Hi Richard
Note that the problem only occurs while restoring a NetWare Cluster!!! And in a
situation in which there are no processes occuring... the restores works fine...
So I don't believe it has anything to do with the COMMTimeout... in that case the
problem should be more persistent!
Rega
Yes, you can "convert"-- they "migrate" it to the Passport Advantage
program (which has it's own section just to migrate folks) and you provide
them with the number of processors that you had it running on when it was
sold as a services offering, and then they whip up an offer on maintenance
of ITS
Hello!
I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount retention set to
minutes, but as you can see below the volumes is being dismounted
seconds after the archive session to the tape drive has completed for the
storage agent. Is there a parameter that must be set on the storage agent
Hi Joni,
You it restarted the TSM Server after modifying the Mount Retention
(min): 9,999?
Att,
Elenara
-Mensagem original-
De: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 10:08
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: lan-free tape dismount retention
Hel
I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
By querying the library volumes it does not say that these
tapes contains "data" but they are still private. Querying
the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are
however
Hi,
Issue a q vol and see if the output has "Scratch Volume?: Yes"
in it. If this is set to NO the volume remains in the storage pool it was
defined to. If it is set to YES, you have to do an audit vol
fix=yes.
Regard.
Karel
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Jacques Butcher [mailto:[E
Here is a new one. The system had problems mounting volume 000551.
-I reset it offsite
-took it out of the library ( it said it wasn't present in the lib when
i tried doing a checkout)
-tried checking it in and got:
07/16/03 09:40:17 ANR8422I CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Operation for library
IBM3494A
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
> volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
> By querying the library volumes it does not say that these
> tapes contains "data" but they are
Hi,
I want to do a restore procedure of a database Oracle 8i runnig over Sun
Solaris. I tried to restore this database in other server that have a
different file system ( AIX 4.3.3 ) and I had the following message error:
RMAN> alter database mount;
RMAN-03022: compiling command: alter db
RMAN-03
Hi all,
a collegue just installed the TSM 5.2 client and required add-ons to be able
to properly back-up open files. After some fooling around with the settings,
we still got no further than:
07/16/2003 16:30:24 ANS1327E The snapshot operation for 'C:\*' failed. Error
code: 673.
07/16/2003 16:30
Hi Remco!
Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For
Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Remco!
> Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For
> Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached...
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Air
The '?' character matches exactly one character. Examples of matches for
your *:\documents? pattern:
c:\documents1
f:\documents$
Examples that do NOT match:
c:\Documents and Settings
t:\documents
If you are interested in excluding all directories whose names begin with
"documents",
Hi Remco!
You are right, but aren't empty volumes always in a pending or scratch
state?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated
Steve,
Can you answer me this? Does your backup actually fail, or is this just
something that shows up during a successful backup?
The /adsmorc filespace is a TSM Server filespace and is the default for
TDP Oracle and will get created during the backup, if it doesn't already
exist. Unless of cour
Neil,
Im still waiting to find out from the DBA running it if he thinks it is
succeeding or failing.
Right now we dont have TDPO_FS defined so it is defaulting to adsmorc. My
question is: is this only a filespace created within TSM Server storage or
does there need to be an actual directory/mount
The information in q auditocc tells me a lot but I wonder if there is a way
to get the same information and order it by megabytes/gigabytes/terabytes
from the heaviest hitter to the least. I would also like to have a column
that includes the number of files each of the nodes TSM is tracking. This i
>select * from auditocc order by total_mb asc
;-)
"Gill, Geoffrey
L." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help Q auditocc or other query
Sent by: "ADSM:
sorry, one of these days I'll learn to read...
here is more along the lines of what you are looking for...
(not much data here because this is the test serve
tsm: TSMSRV08>select
auditocc.node_name,auditocc.total_mb,sum(occupancy.num_files) as file_cnt
from auditocc,occupancy where auditocc.n
Hello all,
I am working with a some Oracle people to define a backup solution.
I suggested using the Oracle TDP for doing HOT backups. They said that the
TDP does nothing for them because they do NOT use RMAN. They write their
own scripts to freeze/release the table spaces and do backups
Yes,
Same reason our DBAs did not want to use it. They didn't want to deal
with learning RMAN.
SQL-BACKTRACK apparantly generates the RMAN scripts and so we use that.
But there, they claim they need full backups because thuer is no
difference in size/ length of time between an incrmental and a ful
You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point.
The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server
for this node name. You could change it to something else if you
want with the TDPO_FS env variable.
The message you are getting tells you that that particular obje
Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when
reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm
status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the time it's
defined in a stgpool until the time of the first file write commit onto that
volume.
Alex
Elenara,
It actually looks like you're selecting from the backups table here. When
you do your restore, try displaying active and inactive versions (green
diamond button, or view menu). That should show the file. If not, please
describe more closely exactly what you do when you attempt the rest
Thank you Alex,
My problem was solved yesterday by our friend Andrew Raibeck.
Att,
Elenara
-Mensagem original-
De: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 15:46
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: INACTIVE -> ACTIVE FILE VERSION
Elenara,
I
I am currently trying to backup devconfig and volhist to a networked
drive under windows
Here is the command I use
Backup volhist filenames=f:\test\volhist.out
Backup devconfig filenames=f:\test\devonfig.out
I always get the error
ANR2391E BACKUP DEVCONFIG: Server could not write device config
That's correct! It's true that work with RMAN is a little bit hard, but if use LTO2
you will see the advantage of using TDP for Oracle. There's no disk subsystem so fast
as LTO2. Those drive units can transfer at 70MB/s compressed.
So to utilize the LTO2 drives with it's full capacity you have t
Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up.
According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node
we are backing up using TDP, correct?
After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table,
it appears we are getting this
No idea about the missing "-". I believe the long name is built by
Oracle/RMAN and not TSM. So need to look there. I don't know
how that is put together, need to get with your DBA or Oracle on that.
(I just looked at mine and all my RMAN backups use "_" as separators
and have different numberin
Have you checked the access permissions to F: ?
Doug Thorneycroft
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
(562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058
FAX (562) 699-6756
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tae Kim
Sent: Wednesday,
Thanks again. One more quick question... does the filespace name, such as
/adsmorc need to be "included" in the include/exclude list as the docs
state? I suppose if so it would be on the TDP client?
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 20
in dsmserv.opt of Library Client:
SHAREDLIBIDLE YES
-Original Message-
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lan-free tape dismount retention
Hello!
I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount reten
We use it here, well sort of. We have a separate node name for the
RMAN backups on each client, that is one node name for B/A on
this machine and a separate node name for the RMAN/TDPO client.
Therefore we have two stanzas each in dsm.sys and dsm.opt and
have separate backup.excl files. For the
Hi,
I need a "little" help to upgrade the TSM Server from version 4.1.0.0 to
5.x. So far I installed a test server running a 4.1.0.0 a I am following
the steps of Quick Start book (TSM 5.1 for Windows pag. 31) but the DB was
not upgraded. What is the exactly procedure ? I´m running W2K.
Thank
If I remember correctly the TSM "service" process, which runs under a
"service context" has no visability to networked drives. This is a
Microsoft issue (I've had that problem with other products being run as a
service).
Drives are networked and visable in a "user" context.
To demonstrate, if you
46 matches
Mail list logo