Halleluiah!!! I have ALL these same complaints, too; I hope our friend in
Virginia sees and responds to this! It's a great service he does, but it
needs to be made usable, again.,,, nice experiment, now let's fix it,
please?!?
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivol
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Laura Buckley
> I know that it's bad form for me to tout my own product, but STORServer
> Manager (the TSM operational interface) may help you to solve this
> problem. It is a GUI to your tapes at the vault, in the library, i
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
> AFAIK, you can always check in a tape as PRIVATE, regardless of vault
> status.
>
> I think it makes sense, but I haven't tried to do that.
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Check 'em in as private tapes, and when yo
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
> >Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status
> >when they are
> >moved to ONSITERETRIEVE status. You won't be able to check them in as
> >scratch tapes until the reusedelay period of time expi
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Prabhat Ghosh
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
> is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use,
> dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is
> prohibited. If
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Seay, Paul
> You do not have to login. Just select the ADSM-L archives in
> that left bar
> area. It will take you to the search engine area.
>
> I have found that Netscape 4.76 does not work with this site.
Mozilla 1.0.1 w
Fantastic... this is excellent resolution -- the old screen is still there,
just gotta know its new address!
Thanks,
Don
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager, WinNT/2K, AIX/Unix, OS/390
San Jose, Ca
(408) 257-3037
mailto:don_france@;att.net
Profess
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Matt Simpson wrote:
> scratch. All is OK if human retrieves all the right tapes. But if
> one doesn't get retrieved for some reason, there is no longer any
> record that the tape exists and isn't where it belongs. I'd like to
What I do, is create an ad
Hi ,
I thank all for your suggestions.I removed the mirrors of db and log.There
is a great improvement in the performance.I am recommending the customer to
have non RAID disks for db and log.Then i mirror the db and log.
Regards
Raghu.
"Seay, Paul"
The Network transfer rate is always whacked out when using client
compression.
We get all kinds of extraordinary rates, one of the highest last night was
139,504.82 KB/sec (all on 100 Mb/sec link).
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd@;NAPTHE
At 11:48 PM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
That's exactly what will happen. If you set the reusedelay for 1 day, it
will mean that it will be 24 hours before those tapes can be checked in a
scratch tapes--loads of time to make sure that the right tapes are
retrieved.
But that's exactly w
Andrew Raibeck wrote:
Responded to offline.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The com
Do not recommend non-raid ESS disks for TSM that you will mirror. The ESS
defines very large disk groups at a time as RAID-5 or RAID-0 and with the
ESS-800 you can use RAID-1 (actually I think it is RAID-10).
The log is a sequential write only workload for all intensive purposes. In
the case of
I share Mark's sentiments... on TWO points:
- if this was resolved, for both users in the discussion, let's share the
results;
- if DIRMC is no longer relevant, I'd sure like to know why! Win2K is
becoming ever more prevalent, and most data center customers go wild with
lots of permission groups (
After upgrading to 5.1.5.1 on AIX 4.3.3 I've been having a ton of misses and
failed reports, not to mention some as In-Progress that are not and
completed. Has anyone else seen this phenomenon on their system? Last night
I had 15 failed 25 missed and 6 still show In-Progress.
On the ones reporting
Hi
Sorry for this old question but I forgot how to redirect a command to a file
on Novell client.
I tried: show opt (clib_opt)/>sys:/tmp/file.txt
Without any success, show the output still on the screen
Regards Robert Ouzen
E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geoff,
Yep... there have been several other reports about 5.1.5.1 -- looks like the
oven was still not hot enough for this one... it's still not quite fully
cooked. We knew base 5.1.5.0 was flawed from IBM bulletins; didn't know
the full extent of the issue, though.
Last I checked, 5.1.1.6 was
I'd heard that 5.1.5 vanilla release was flawed (big surprise!?!) Maybe you
can try the first PTF (5.1.5.1), or patch level, for your situation...
Version 5 Release 1, Level 5.2 PTF
IP22546_02
(this one just released... 10/17)
There's been a long history indicati
18 matches
Mail list logo
