hi all,
i need a select statement, which output shows the status of the volumes
like unavailable, read only and so on.
thanx for help.
regards
joe
Joerg Heiken
Operator
BBDO Interactive GmbH
Gruenstr. 15
D-40212 Duesseldorf
phone: +49-211-93 08-403
fax: +49-211-93 08-360
mailto:[EMAIL PR
Hi Joe
Here a select command:
select volume_name , stgpool_name , access from volumes where
access='READONLY' or access='UNAVAILABLE'
Regards
Robert Ouzen
Computing Division
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Heiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, O
select volume_name,access from volumes
Joerg
Heiken@BBDO_ITo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTERACTIVE cc:
Sent by: Subject: select statement volume status
Joerg
Hi, Joerg:
Try this one:
select volume_name,status from volumes
Sergio Vázquez Vegas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tlf: 91.213.46.88
-Mensaje original-
De: Joerg Heiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:03 AM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: select statemen
Hello,
use the following:
select volume_name,stgpool_name,pct_reclaim,status,access from volumes
where access='READONLY'
For access you can set: READONLY, READWRITE, UNAVAILABLE, DESTROYED
MfG/regards
Sascha Bräuning
Sparkassen Informatik, Fellbach
OrgEinheit: 6322
Wilhelm-Pfitzer Str. 1
70
>I'm not too sure about the whole cleanup backupgroups myself. I
>understand that Tivoli has re-done the way the database handles
>Windows SYSTEM OBJECTS. So if you don't delete them, then the CLEANUP
>BACKUPGROUPS, as I understand, cleans that up for you
Is this change in system object storage s
Hi Mario
I had the same problem. Solved it using a newer client (5.1.1.5 patch
available from tivoli ftp).
In my case the problem occured when the backup reached a system file (as
file backup - i.e. not "systemObject"). (can't remember what file...sorry).
It happened both from the GUI and the CLI.
Hi
The cleanup backupgroups is intended for one reason only, to fix a bug in
prior versions. In version 4.2.2.X, there was a bug that had the effect
that system objects wasn't expired. What happens is that when you upgrade
from version 4.2.2.X to version 5.1, the installation will be unable to
2 GB RAM
Mario
--- Edgardo Moso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How many mb memory do you have?
>
>
>
>
> From: Mario Behring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/13/2002 01:49 PM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: NT cilent er
I didn't see any attachment. Is this the same error you reported in the
"NT cilent error message" thread? If so, then please obtain more current
Dr. Watson info I emailed you about yesterday, and I will see what I can
see (hopefully you received my instructions for configuring Dr. Watson).
Regard
Environment:
TSM server:
4.1.4.5 on AIX 4.3.3 ML8
Client:
Windows 2000 Server SP2 Cluster
TSM client 5.1.1.5
Options file is set for DOMAIN C: SYSTEMOBJECT
When I try to backup the C: drive on the cluster nodes I get the following
error in the dsmerror.log:
10/13/2002 23:54:59 fioScanDirEntry():
Just to add to the total confusion, you can (will?) experience the same
(similar?) problem in a 4.2.2.x server which I don't see properly clearified
on ADSM-L. Everyone's talking about this appearing when trying to upgrade to
5.1.x, but I have the problem in a plain 4.2.2 environment too: SYSTEM
O
Hello all
we run tsm since years, currently a 4.2 server on a 2way F50 and 100GB disk
pool
we have an automated tape library, something custom (a GRAU/ABBA-J with ibm
3590e drives and ca 1000 cartridges),
we backup/archieve ca 80 GB every day from our servers and workstations
over our lan
we eva
>
> The cleanup backupgroups is intended for one reason only, to fix a bug in
> prior versions. In version 4.2.2.X, there was a bug that had the effect
> that system objects wasn't expired. What happens is that when you upgrade
> from version 4.2.2.X to version 5.1, the installation will be unable
Sorry Hans if I was unclear, but for you that haven't upgraded to version
4.2, this problem doesn't exist.
The system object bug was first introduced with version 4.2.2.0. For
thoose of you using a lower version, my suggestion is to not upgrade to
version 4.2.2, as you will also get this bug.
Thanks for all the replies. It looks like the '-outfile' option is
the one that will work
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Frost, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Script problems
try adding the
Ich werde ab 14.10.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
16.10.2002.
In dringenden Fällen erreichen Sie mich unter der Nummer 0172-6619088.
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Andre Schwier
Information Technology
I'm a newcomer to this list, and a newcomer to TSM. So there's a very
good chance that I'm totally confused. I'm catching the tail end of
this cleanup backupgroups discussion, and I need some clarification.
I think I'm reading that there's a problem in 4.2.2.x versions of TSM
which causes SYSTEM
My update storage pool administrative command schedule
failed on Saturday with the following.
Any reasons why it failed? The Messages manual was a
little vague. It ran ok on Sunday.
10/12/02 03:30:09 ANR2750I Starting scheduled
command MIGRATE
I'm not completely sure, but I think it's caused by a lock. When you are
accessing a table with a select statement or any other action affecting one
table, you can't perform an action that modifies that same table.
Sergio Vázquez Vegas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tlf: 91.213.46.88
-Mensaje original
Hello all,
i get an error at installation starting for TSM BAClient 4.2.1.15,
a message box:
Title: InstallShield DLL Custom Action
Message: Failed to extract file 'Dll_.ini' from the binary table.
Buttons: [OK]
and the installation stopped.
any idea ?
--
David Rigaudiere -+- Administratio
argh,
it is ok,
%TEMP% env variable was on D:\TEMP, which does not exists on this server...
sorry
--
David Rigaudiere -+- Administration TSM + NT
34, Av. de Friedland -+- 3e étage -+- Bureau 317
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+- 01.5621.7802
|-+--->
| |
Matt,
you got it right - there is a problem with SystemObject expiration
introduced in v4.2.2 and you have to run CLEANUP BACKUPGROUP to prevent
enourmous high space usage in DB and storage pool. This applies if you
have many W2k nodes backing up to TSM. It would last until you upgrade to
a versi
What is the show command to see who has the log pinned? Is it in AIX
server 5.1.1.6 level?
David
Folks,
How, on each supported client platform, does one determine the number of
processors? For instance, in Windows 2000 you can use winmsd to find this.
If you know how to do this on the various platforms, please respond to me
privately and I will consolidate the responses and post them under
> Sorry Hans if I was unclear, but for you that haven't upgraded to version
> 4.2, this problem doesn't exist.
>
> The system object bug was first introduced with version 4.2.2.0. For
> thoose of you using a lower version, my suggestion is to not upgrade to
> version 4.2.2, as you will also ge
Kelly,
On most of Unix its sar -P ALL 1 10
Balanand Pinni
SBC Services Inc.
Work:314-206-5911
Pager:1-800-451-6897
Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager
-Original Message-
From: Kelly J. Lipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:33 PM
To:
> Matt,
>
> you got it right - there is a problem with SystemObject expiration
> introduced in v4.2.2 and you have to run CLEANUP BACKUPGROUP to prevent
> enourmous high space usage in DB and storage pool. This applies if you
> have many W2k nodes backing up to TSM. It would last until you upgrade
> you got it right - there is a problem with SystemObject expiration
> introduced in v4.2.2 and you have to run CLEANUP BACKUPGROUP to prevent
> enourmous high space usage in DB and storage pool. This applies if you
> have many W2k nodes backing up to TSM. It would last until you upgrade
to
> a ve
does that expiration problem with System objects exist on 4.2.1.9?
Joseph Dawes
I/T Infrasctructure - Unix Technical Support
Chubb & Son, a Division of Federal Insurance Company
15 MountainView Road
Warren,New Jersey 07059
Office:908.903.3890
We just jumped for z/OS 1.2 from OS/390 and am starting to have lots of
problems with my TSM on OS390 4.1.4.
I was hoping to wait for the 4.2.3 update but with the problems I am
having, I don't seem to have a choice but to upgrade, ASAP ! Especially
since 4.1.x is no longer supported.
I have be
> Sorry Hans if I was unclear, but for you that haven't upgraded to
version
> 4.2, this problem doesn't exist.
>
> The system object bug was first introduced with version 4.2.2.0. For
> thoose of you using a lower version, my suggestion is to not upgrade to
> version 4.2.2, as you will also get th
Hello,
AIX 5.1, TSM-server 4.2.2.8
When I execute command 'select * from auditocc' (without quotes) from
command-line in Administrator Web-Interface it gives following output:
NODE_NAME: CLIENT
BACKUP_MB: 1000
BACKUP_COPY_MB: 0
ARCHIVE_MB: 0
ARCHIVE_COPY_MB: 0
SPACEMG_MB: 0
SPACEMG_COPY_MB: 0
TO
How come you are not going to 5.1.x. I am running 5.1.1.4. It hasn't
introduced anything horrible and new. I still see my CPU usage go up
(2.5x) and I/O rate go down (to half) while migrations runs. But I saw
that happening on 4.1.5 also. Be careful NOT to go to 5.1.0. That was
bad.
$
"MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/14/2002 02:34 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Can't wait for TSM for OS
Hello all,
one of the e-mail servers at MCKINSEY.COM resends mailings back to ADSM-L
list. That why we are getting (or at least me) nearly all posts to the
list twice.
I've already dropped a note to but with no answer till now.
Hopefully it would be resolved soon.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
OK, I was proven wrong or unclear.
In fact the bug was introduced somewhere in v4.2.2.x and the solution for
it (cleanup backupgroup) in v4.2.2.y + v5.1.1.z. For sure bug and fix for
it were not in same patch ,-)
But even in V4.2.2.0 there were numerous reports to this list for some
expiration pro
I am seeing duplicates of just about everything today too.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/14/02 03:01PM >>>
Hello all,
one of the e-mail servers at MCKINSEY.COM resends mailings back to
ADSM-L
list. That why we are getting (or at least me) nearly all posts to the
list twice.
I've already
It's probably adjusting to the narrow frame width of the browser.
Redirect to a file (" > filename") and look at the output. Not sure if
you can do this with a browser
You can also run a commandline script and use the -commadelimited flag.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 07:27, brian wel
Use the -DISPLAYMODE=LIST option when invoking dsmadmc, i.e.:
dsmadmc -id=myid -password=xx -displaymode=list etc
See the TSM Administrators Reference, Chapter 3. section "Using
Administrative Client Options" for more info.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Stora
I push the problem back a level and keep the admin passwords in a reversibly
encrypted file. Then I can go and look up the password for the administrator
(based on unix id) running the script.
- Kai.
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday,
Is there any special syntax for the cleanup backupgroups question. I
upgraded to 4.2.2.12 and tried to run the
cleanup command and received the following error:
Anrd tb.c(1167) threadid(31) invalid encoded data length
Anr0104e imutil.c(8363) Error deleting r
Hi All
I am running TSM Server 4.1.0.0 under NT 4 SP6 and IE6 and the follow
message is appearing on console :
ANR4706W Unable to open file CommandLine$COMClassObject.class to satisfy
web session...
After this, the TSM Server simply down.
Does anybody know what is this problem ?
TIA !!!
Lu
We have an NT node that is still on v3.51 of NT. Does anyone know what
version of client I should use on the node? Should I go all the way back
to V3.7 (if I can find the CD)?
Thanks!!
Michael Moore
VF Services Inc.
121 Smith Street
Greensboro, NC 27420-1488
Voice: 336-332-4423
Fax: 336-332
No! v3.7 supports only Win9x/NT4/2k. You have to go further and use ADSM
v3.1 client!!!
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/adsm/fixes/v3r1/win32/intel/
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michael Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14.10.2002 23:48
P
Michael, NT 3.51 is explicitly mentioned as supported in 3.1.0.8. The
client can still be downloaded from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/adsm/fixes/v3r1/win32/intel/single/
For the TSM 3.7 client go to
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v3r7/Windo
If the command as follows does not work, you need to call support:
cleanup backupgroups
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
show logpin
I just guessed. It works on 4.2.2.12 as well.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pinned log
What is
>What is the show command to see who has the log pinned? Is it in AIX server
>5.1.1.6 level?
SHOW LOGPIN is not in v5.1.1.6. It was added back in on the newest
maintenance/patch - v5.1.5.1.
Gretchen Thiele
Princeton University
On one of TSM client I am using two management classes/ copy groups. In
include_exclude file I have added new management class name in front of the
file system's name and the rest of includes use default management class.
Default management group has vere, verd, rete and reto parameters set to 35
SYSTEM OBJECTS is a windows thing. If you do not have windows clients, you
probably do not have the problem. The release you are running 4.2.2.0 is
not a good release to be on. I would recommend you get to 4.2.2.12 or
higher as soon as possible. I will not say go to 4.2.3.0 because it is not
a
This is one of the best ATLs, most cost effective for sure. The 3590 drive
duty cycle is one of the best in the industry. There is no other ATL that
supports the 3590 drive except a huge STK silo. A step to LTO or anything
else is backwards. The ATL is just a dumb tape mounter. The drives are
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Robert Ouzen
> I generate a backupset of a Novell Client 5 with TSM client 4.2.1.29 and
> trying to restore it on a Novell client 6 with TSM client 5.1.0.0.
> I run the commands to the new server:
>1. load dsmc -virtualnode=
From: Dave Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I've recently taken a look at the new TSM 5.1.5 client for Mac OS/Mac
> OS X. Some serious issues still remain, and I'd like to know IBM's
> official position on these issues:
>
[snippage]
>
> I have called in to IBM about this countless times, and
I believe it's referring to the Platform I'm not 100% sure though
- you can update the node and specify the platform and see if for that node
the ? disappears or not. I have done this from GUI not from the command
line.
-Original Message-
From: Sudheer Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
The IP22569 ODBC driver readme states
The TSM ODBC driver is supported on the following Microsoft
operating systems:
- Windows 98
- Windows Me
- Windows NT 4.0 (SP 4 or higher)
- Windows 2000
yet when I try to install it on my Win98SE system, the installer
co
The one thing I've missed in this discussion thread is whether the version
4.2.2 that introduced the bug is the server or the client version.
I am still running server version 4.1.5.0 on AIX, but my newest file
servers are running version 4.2.2.0 clients. Those nodes are Windows 2000
Server mach
SERVER
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Tab Trepagnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cleanup backupgroups
The one thing I've missed in this discussion thre
58 matches
Mail list logo
