Re: fs backup versus database backup

2003-03-13 Thread Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41
er to tape than disk" Do you use caching on your disk storagepools? Kind regards Thomas Rupp Vorarlberger Illwerke AG -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. März 2003 18:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: fs back

AW: fs backup versus database backup

2003-03-13 Thread Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)
se caching on your disk storagepools? Kind regards Thomas Rupp Vorarlberger Illwerke AG -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. März 2003 18:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: fs backup versus database backup Hi

Re: fs backup versus database backup

2003-03-12 Thread Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41
both backups go to disk -Original Message- From: Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 12 maart 2003 18:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: fs backup versus database backup Hi Ruud, to which storagepools do you move your data (disk, tape)? Your FS

AW: fs backup versus database backup

2003-03-12 Thread Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)
. März 2003 18:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: fs backup versus database backup Hi FS backup: Network data transfer rate:56,265.13 KB/sec i.e. 56Mb/sec starttime 02:30 endtime 02:55 ANE4961I (Session: 4073, Node: RYSAP380) Total number of bytes transferred

fs backup versus database backup

2003-03-12 Thread Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41
Hi FS backup: Network data transfer rate:56,265.13 KB/sec i.e. 56Mb/sec starttime 02:30 endtime 02:55 ANE4961I (Session: 4073, Node: RYSAP380) Total number of bytes transferred: 396.77 MB Database backup: BKI1215I: Average transmission rate was 97.247 GB/h (27.