Re: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

HI! thanks to everyone of u srinivas

Re: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side any specifc reason? thanks

Re: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

5:19 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side any specifc reason? thanks This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individ

Re: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

On 26 nov 2008, at 14:18, srinivas ryiad wrote: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side any specifc reason? dsm.sys contains the system configuration, dsm.opt contains the default arguments to dsm/dsmc, the latter can be overridden on the command-line. th

Re: HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

o the system directly. But the function is there, for the sites that still need it. On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:18 AM, srinivas ryiad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > HI! > WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side any specifc > reason? > > thanks >

HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side

HI! WHY dsm.sys & dsm.opt why not a single file on client side any specifc reason? thanks

Re: dsm.sys / dsm.opt

With files that far back, I would use the default that comes with 4.2 and put any mods you had in clients file manually. I think there were a command/statement or two that are no longer used and could cause a problem. Also some new/changed stuff. Don't know all the details of 2.6. David Longo

dsm.sys / dsm.opt

Are dsm.opt and dsm.sys comapatible across releases. We've just copied these files from a 2.6 client to a 4.2 client. Were there any enhancements, ommissions?

Re: "AFSbackupmntpnt NO" in dsm.sys / dsm.opt

Hi, We're using 'DFSBACKUPMNTPNT NO'. We never had any trouble with it. Of course it would go wrong when a user decides to create an endless loop or does his own mounts somewhere, just like you said. But what is the worst thing that could happen when one of these thing occurs? Sure, your backups

Re: "AFSbackupmntpnt NO" in dsm.sys / dsm.opt

Peter: We had considered the idea, but decided against it. The possibility of loops and/or someone doing something stupid like mounting root.afs was just too great a risk for us. We actually create a 'backup tree' before we run backups every night. This backup tree has mount points for the ba

"AFSbackupmntpnt NO" in dsm.sys / dsm.opt

Hi *SM'ers, 1. I'd like to know if anyone is using this option in the following format: AFSbackupmntpnt NO or the DFS-pendant DFSbackupmntpnt NO 2. anyone using this option in the above form could they report on positive or BAD experiences (e.g. having trouble by users doing own