From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Lamb, Charles P.
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:44 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 Checkin/Checkout Tape Operational Question
>
> Hi.
>
> We have just inst
er 05, 2008 4:01 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 Checkin/Checkout Tape Operational Question
Does ALMS apply to the TS3310? Do you have virtual I/O enabled?
Does 3576lib and its control path drive really correspond to cgoatl03?
[RC]
-Original Message-
From:
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 Checkin/Checkout Tape Operational Question
Hi.
We have just installed a brand new TS3310 ==> IBM 3576-L5B ATL. Atape
version is 11.2.7.0 and ATL version is 500GS002 which appears to be
current. TSM version is 5.4.3.2 and IBM 7
DSM-L] IBM TS3310 Checkin/Checkout Tape Operational Question
Use the web interface of the library and assign the tapes to the logical
library, that should work.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wanda Prather
Sent: Wednesday, November
: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 Checkin/Checkout Tape Operational
Question
NO that's not normal. Something is hosed up in the config.
The TS3310 should work just like a 3584 responding to a CHECKIN.
(Your SEARCH=BULK should NOT have worked after you manually moved the
tapes to storage slots.)
What you d
sion is 11.2.7.0 and ATL version is 500GS002 which appears to be
> current. TSM version is 5.4.3.2 and IBM 7026-H70 AIX V5.3.8.3. We have
> an IBM 3584-L32/D32 ATL which works differently concerning the
> checkin/checkout tapes via I/O slots. Does the TS3310 I/O slots work
> differently a
the checkin/checkout tapes via I/O
slots. Does the TS3310 I/O slots work differently as oppose to the IBM
3584-L32/D32 ATL I/O slots. See below for the TS3310 operational tasks.
We have run tapeutil -f /dev/smc0 inventory which shows robot, I/O slots,
drives and library slots.
Step one of this morn
: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:32 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 checkin/checkout
I'm wondering if I'm missing anything in our setup of the 3584 as it relates
to incoming and outgoing tapes. Currently the mainframe sends alerts to the
operators when the I/O port is full on th
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:10:09PM -0400, Jim Zajkowski wrote:
> People leave their IO doors open?
After exchanging tapes, it *did* happen once or twice here. When that
happens, people automatically get informed Really Quickly and come to
the library to close the door. Which is no problem, becaus
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:01:49PM -0500, John Monahan wrote:
> The whole point of using scripts is so you don't have any manual tasks
> *unless* something is wrong. I would consider an open library door as
> something being wrong.
I meant that it probably would be wise to not use the WAITTIME=0
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim Zajkowski
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 3584 checkin/checkout
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
> Yeah, but when you enter this command and the library door
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
Yeah, but when you enter this command and the library door is NOT
closed, all you library operations will hang until the door is
closed.
People leave their IO doors open?
--Jim
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/04/2006
11:24:56 AM:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Jim Zajkowski wrote:
>
>[scsi library]
> > In 5.3, you can say checkin libv waitt=0 and it will not bother to
> > generate a prompt, it will just do it. Handy.
>
> Yeah, but when you enter
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Jim Zajkowski wrote:
[scsi library]
> In 5.3, you can say checkin libv waitt=0 and it will not bother to
> generate a prompt, it will just do it. Handy.
Yeah, but when you enter this command and the library door is NOT
closed, all you library ope
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Kauffman, Tom wrote:
The checkin script runs a 'checkin libv search=bulk
checklabel=barcode stat=pri', does a 'reply' to the tsm-generated
prompt, and updates each volume as it is checked in to an access of
'readw'. We fill the I/O port and run the script; if there are more
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 checkin/checkout
Both of these processes require scripting in order to automate things to
the point that the 3584 appears more 3494-ish. We use a perl script to
kick off the 'move drm' command (or 'checkout libv' command, take your
pick) and mo
What about using the "remove=untileefull" parameter on the "move drm"
command? Fills the IO slots, then stops. After the IO door is cleared,
you can rerun the command to continue ejecting tapes.
Nick Cassimatis
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ocess, we do it a second time.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:32 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 3584 checkin/checkout
I'm wondering if I'm missin
Both of these processes require scripting in order to automate things to
the point that the 3584 appears more 3494-ish. We use a perl script to
kick off the 'move drm' command (or 'checkout libv' command, take your
pick) and monitor the TSM server messages via a dsmadmc -consolemode
session. If t
I'm wondering if I'm missing anything in our setup of the 3584 as it relates
to incoming and outgoing tapes. Currently the mainframe sends alerts to the
operators when the I/O port is full on the 3494 and needs emptying. Once
empty the checkout of tapes can continues. I was wondering how others man
.
It is nasty, but seems to work.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Strasheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Checkin / Checkout trouble
Aloha,
I told the library to checkout a tape .. which i did, but i didn't reply t
Aloha,
I told the library to checkout a tape .. which i did, but i didn't reply to
the process for 3 weeks ... .But now i couldn't reply to the process.
In the meantine i cancel the process ... which didn't work.
I took out the tape and check it in again ...
but now i have to process, which don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: checkin,checkout
If you checked tapes out of library through
If you checked tapes out of library through *SM then they should not show up in a q
libvol. Did you use *SM to checkout?
Not familiar with the library you mentioned, I've worked with larger automated
libraries. With them q libvol only shows tapes that *SM knows(thinks) are physically
in libr
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: checkin,checkout
Hello All
Checking out and then checking in of a new set of tapes to a library
appears to take no effect. I check out all the tapes (I have a Compaq
auto-loader with 10 tape cap. and barcode reader) and
PL give attributes remove=yes force=yes along with check out and the
see
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Sheehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: checkin,checkout
Hello All
Checking out and then checking in of a
Hello All
Checking out and then checking in of a new set of tapes to a library
appears to take no effect. I check out all the tapes (I have a Compaq
auto-loader with 10 tape cap. and barcode reader) and then checkin the new
ones yet when I do a q libvol it still shows the old ones. I'm still
lear
Hello,
i have an automated libary with one drive and 8 Slots.
In the first 6 slots i have DLT tapes and one tape is mounted in the drive.
The tape in Slot 3 which is not mounted and contains archived data should
be checkout and an scratched and labeld Volume should be checked in.
What steps do i
28 matches
Mail list logo
