e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henrik Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004 15:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Systemobjects backup fail
I use TSM to backup my AD. I
I use TSM to backup my AD. I've used it for some time without problems but
all of a sudden I get the error ANR2579E Returncode=8.
I can't find waht the Returncode mean in this case.
I've changed the password for the server and verifyed that it works. Normal
backup works without problems for teh sa
tsm friends,
environment:
tsm server 5.2.2.3
tsm client 5.2.2.5
windows 2000 server
i thought, that a complete restore of w2k system objects will completely
overwrite and replace existing registry on my w2k server.
what we made was backup of w2k systemobjects last night.
we then create some ne
hello tsm friends,
environment:
tsm server 5.2.2.3
tsm client 5.2.2.5
windows 2000 server
i thought, that a complete restore of w2k system objects will completely
overwrite and replace existing registry on my w2k server.
what we made was backup of w2k systemobjects last night.
we then create
ager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bill Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 6:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win2K SystemObjects and Backup Group Copy Frequency
I just saw a page on the TSM support site that had steps for a weekly backup
of the system object. Create a schedule with
remember.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Scott McCambly
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 9:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win2K SystemObjects and Backup Group Copy Frequency
Hello there,
Has anyone had any exper
Hello there,
Has anyone had any experience trying to limit the number of backups of
the system state objects in Win2K?
I thought the obvious choice was to use the new "include.systemobject
ALL mgmtclass" option and set the backup copygroup in the specified
management class to have a non-zero copy f
-Original Message-
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
Easy way to tell is to
show versions {node name} "SYSTEM OBJECT"
and look for excessive amounts of record
above on AIX and Solaris.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
When I do q filespace it show "SYSTEM OBJECT" but the percent util is 0.
If I do a q occ it shows x MB
8 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
Well, on my windows nodes the system object is "SYSTEM OBJECT". Did you try
it in upper case? Also, mine show up singular - "SYSTEM OBJECT".
Do a Q FILESPACE {node} and you should see all the filespaces listed along
with the
age-
From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
When I use the command show versions api-sql "system objects" from my TSM
server it returns no data! Am I us
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
When I use the command show versions api-sql "system objects" from my TSM
server it returns no data! Am I using the wrong syntax?
) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---
-Original Message-
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
Easy way to tell is to
show versions {node name} &quo
Stuttgart
Germany
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jolliff, Dale
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SystemObjects
>
>
> Easy way to tell is to
>
>
ay, December 19, 2002 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SystemObjects
Bruce,
I don't think so.
To tell, look at the occupancy object count for your sys-objects. I would
think that <= 20,000 for an average system is not unreasonable, but the
figure varies with the copygroup s
Bruce Kamp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: "ADSM: cc:
Dist StorSubject: SystemObjects
Manager"
I'm running TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
My questions are:
1. Is systemobject problem fixed at this level?
2. If not how do tell when they start getting out of hand?
Here is the Q OCC for one of my 2000 nodes.
Node Name Type FilespaceFSID Storage Number of Physical
Logical
;Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/09/2002 22:08
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Su
ne is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
Aree Hagopian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/10/2002 00:11
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
an [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Systemobjects on WIN2K
Starting with V5.1.5.0, you can now exclude the systemobjects from backup -
you do not have to specifically set this in the domain. For example, if you
had local dr
Can the 5.1.5 client be used with 4.2.2.12?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Dave Canan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Systemobjects on WIN2K
Starting
Starting with V5.1.5.0, you can now exclude the systemobjects from backup -
you do not have to specifically set this in the domain. For example, if you
had local drives C:. D:, and E: you could do an incremental backup on the
local drives, but not the windows systemobjects, by specifying
ystem object will be backed up aswell.
Hope this helps!
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
-Original Message-
From: Nilsson Niklas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 09:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Systemo
Hi...
When you specify Domain all-local i get the systemobjects with me in
the backup ok?!?
Is there a way not to backup the systemfiles (winnt-files 200 Mb) in
every backup?
//Niklas
Can anyone tell me how to NOT backup SYSTEMObjects?
Thanks
Thanks Much!!
That Worked
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Huettmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: SYSTEMObjects
Maybe quick and dirty, but it works.
Use domain statements in your option file.
If a "dom
Maybe quick and dirty, but it works.
Use domain statements in your option file.
If a "domain c:" entry exists, the systemobjects will not be backed up.
-
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / with regards
Karsten Hüttmann
--
Karste
We are runing TSM 4.1.3 on AIX 4.3.3, 400 Win2K Pro clients.
With the clients at 4.2.0, backup of SYSTEMOBJECTs is working fine, I've
done bare metal restores successfully.
-Original Message-
From: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:07
Hi there,
I am running the same system. Your client code has to
be at Version 4 release 1 level 3.0
Fritz Mesumbe.
--- "Ochs, Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning,
> I am running TSM 4.1 on AIX 4.3.3 with NT clients
> running 4.1. We will be
> migrating to Win2K some time this yea
Good morning,
I am running TSM 4.1 on AIX 4.3.3 with NT clients running 4.1. We will be
migrating to Win2K some time this year and I will need to backup system
objects. So far, want I can determine is that my server will need to be at
4.2 as well as my clients. Has anybody completed this migrati
30 matches
Mail list logo
