: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance Problems
I will check it out the Share website. This is a brand new server, that is
why we chose to go with 5.1
Thanks to you and the others who have responded to help me out!
Brenda
"Seay,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris Performance Problems
M>
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
Could u pl send what is ur hme or er parameters in /etc/system.
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Brenda Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solaris Performance Problems
Hi!
We recently installed TSM 5.1 on Solaris 2.8
Sent by: Subject: Re: Solaris Performance Problems
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
05/23/2002
07:53 PM
Please respond
, May 23, 2002 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solaris Performance Problems
Hi!
We recently installed TSM 5.1 on Solaris 2.8. The performance is terrible
and I can't get any better going to tape than I do to disk. We already
tried moving from filesystems to raw logical disk for our
Hi!
We recently installed TSM 5.1 on Solaris 2.8. The performance is terrible
and I can't get any better going to tape than I do to disk. We already
tried moving from filesystems to raw logical disk for our disk pools. It
helped some but not enough to make a difference on anything.
I have tun
