Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-11 Thread Robert Ouzen
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:08 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, The only other thing I can think of right now is to have you start a migration and let it run until it

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, You have a naming problem. Your storage pool name is I2000_server1, but your copy destination is sending it to a storage pool called I2000_postback! Update your

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
, August 10, 2005 10:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, You have a naming problem. Your storage pool name is I2000_server1, but your copy destination is sending it to a storage pool called I2000_postback! Update your copydestination in the

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:58 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, You are right it looks like the destination is correct. I am assuming the error message you got was on the target server, correct? What is the out

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
: Low-level Address: -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:58 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, You are right it looks

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
?? Regards Robert -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:54 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, When you are doing virtual volumes like you are doing the virtual volume on the ta

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
gt; >Regards > >Robert > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Mark D. Rodriguez >Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:54 PM >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question > >Rob

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D. Rodriguez Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:54 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, When you are doing virtual volumes like you are doing the virtual volume on the target server is actually managed as an ar

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
t: Re: Server to Server migration question Robert, When you are doing virtual volumes like you are doing the virtual volume on the target server is actually managed as an archive object. Therefore, I would bet that the archive copygroup for that management class is pointing at the diskpool. Also, it

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread fred johanson
Check to see if DISKPOOL is defined. It may be the default for DIRMC, assuming this is for WinNT. At 09:19 PM 8/10/2005 +0300, you wrote: Hi to all I tried to make a server to server migration here the steps I made: On source Server named SERVER1 1. I define a server SERVER2 (target

Re: Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
Robert, When you are doing virtual volumes like you are doing the virtual volume on the target server is actually managed as an archive object. Therefore, I would bet that the archive copygroup for that management class is pointing at the diskpool. Also, it is a good practice to put server nodes

Server to Server migration question

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi to all I tried to make a server to server migration here the steps I made: On source Server named SERVER1 1. I define a server SERVER2 (target server) 2. I define a devclass SERVERCLASS with device type SERVER and servername SERVER2 3. I create a stg SERVER1_POOL with devcl