you can look back in the recovery log and see that the log filled at the point
it abandoned the task.
Nothing to be done except to increase the log size.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/15/2005 1:30:03 PM >>>
Hi,
I´ve 42 clients configured and in one of them I´ve a missed status when i
try to back
Hi,
I´ve 42 clients configured and in one of them I´ve a missed status when i
try to backup because of the following error:
12/09/2005 08:22:22 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\server01\c$\WINDOWS\msagent\agentctl.dll' failed
12/09/2005 08:22:22 ANS1316E The server does not have enough recover
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 17:28:54 -0400, you wrote:
>If I ask the list how rare it is, I'm sure I'll get flames from everybody
>who HAS seen software corruption, and probably NO response from the many
>people who are running fine.
Guess again.
>Maybe somebody in Tivoli support could venture a guess as
I agree with Paul, it is pretty rare - but it can happen. You can't
guarantee to prevent software or hardware corruption : you just have
to plan the recovery path ...
The last corruption I had was on a (pretty large) test DB when trying
to see the impact of a problem I had at 3.7 (live) on the 4
riginal Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Paul Zarnowski
> > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:16 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Recovery Log size / roll forward benefits
> >
> >
> >
mean?
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Garrison, Tony
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Recovery Log size / roll forward benefits
>
>
> We use Roll-forward here. T
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Paul Zarnowski
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Recovery Log size / roll forward benefits
>
>
> Lindsay, et al,
>
> It is very possible to lose your database but not the log (we have done
&
with
what we have.
-Original Message-
From: Lindsay Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Recovery Log size / roll forward benefits
I'm with Kelly in thinking that roll-forward is unnecessary in most
rward? If so, would you mind discussing it briefly?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Kelly J. Lipp
> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:36 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
> At 08:35 AM 6/22/2001 -0600, Kelly J. Lipp wrote:
> >Doesn't this bring back the issue of Roll-Forward vs. not? I guess I'm
> >still in the not camp with no compelling reason to join the other. Also,
> >for those in the other camp, I'm thinking if your environment is so large
as
> >to fill a 1
At 08:35 AM 6/22/2001 -0600, Kelly J. Lipp wrote:
>Doesn't this bring back the issue of Roll-Forward vs. not? I guess I'm
>still in the not camp with no compelling reason to join the other. Also,
>for those in the other camp, I'm thinking if your environment is so large as
>to fill a 13 GB log i
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicholas Cassimatis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Recovery Log size
>
> With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
> within that lim
>With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
>within that limit, I don't think many people will be hitting the 13GB limit
>all that quick. An incremental database backup will still flush the log,
>and, with 13GB, I think we'll be OK if we don't change the way we are doi
feel really merits
logmode=rollforward? If so, would you mind discussing it briefly?
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Kelly J. Lipp
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
simatis
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recovery Log size
With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
within that limit, I don't think many people will be hitting the 13GB limit
all that quick. An incremental database b
With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
within that limit, I don't think many people will be hitting the 13GB limit
all that quick. An incremental database backup will still flush the log,
and, with 13GB, I think we'll be OK if we don't change the way we are doing
o
>An FYI - TSM 4.2 will increase the limit to 13GB.
I think we're all wondering when the first voice will be heard asking
when the 13 GB limit will be increased. And I think we're all wondering
why the increase was little more than a doubling of the current limit -
which customers are already str
roadcast-- on this list, and
>at any SHARE, Storage symposium, Oxford- type meeting.
>
>lisa
>
>
>
>
>"Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>06/21/2001 08:31 AM
>Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PRO
i[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Recovery Log size
>
> Yes, it made it to the list. I've been anxiously awaiting a response from
> someone conf
ond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)
Subject:Recovery Log size
I posted this 2 days ago but saw no responses. Did it make it to the list?
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In on
Yes, it made it to the list. I've been anxiously awaiting a response from
someone confirming this. I am unaware of this "special fix", but we could
certainly benefit from it.
I have heard that some relief *may* be in a new release of TSM, perhaps
4.2, which I just received in the mail yesterday
Yes, we saw it. I haven't heard any responses or heard anything else about it.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/21/01 09:31AM >>>
I posted this 2 days ago but saw no responses. Did it make it to the list?
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In one the discussions
I posted this 2 days ago but saw no responses. Did it make it to the list?
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In one the discussions we
had it was mentioned by the instructor that the size of the recovery log
could be over the 5.5gb current limit. I questioned him on th
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In one the discussions we
had it was mentioned by the instructor that the size of the recovery log
could be over the 5.5gb current limit. I questioned him on this since there
has been much discussion on it, quite recently in fact. Accor
24 matches
Mail list logo
