The library manager needs access to the control path anf data path as it
mounts tapes and reads labels. Storage agents only need access to the data
path because they only read and write data.
On 13 Aug 2015 2:28 am, "S Kumar" wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have mixed library filled with Ultrium 4 and U
Hi Robert,
yes you can and is highly suggested to have Server and Storage agent at the
exact same version. And yes, you can have a 6.2.3.1 client on a Storage
Agent node running 6.3.3.100.
Hope this helps.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Robert Ouzen wrote:
> Hi to all
> I have a TSM Server ve
I have STA 5.4 running on a 6.2 server. Same spread on versions.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David
Rigaudiere
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:38 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Storage Age
STA should be at same level as server.
Le 26 févr. 2013 à 19:31, Robert Ouzen a écrit :
> Hi to all
>
> Anybody now if Storage agent version 5.5.2 is working against a TSM server
> of 6.3.3.100 or needed a Storage agent of version 6+
>
> Regards Robert
It is in Passport. I downloaded it earlier today.
Tivoli Software> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Storage Area Networks V5.4
eAssembly, Multilingual> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for SAN V5.4 (Storage
Agent), UNIX and Linux, Multilingual
Regards,
Shawn
___
Hi,
Configuration :
Server A - library client / Data Manager
Server C - Library manager
Client is registered on Server A
Storage agent is configured to connect to server A (devconfig)
Storage agent MUST be defined on BOTH server A and server C
And, last but not least, Paths are defined on Server
We did the same thing with both backups. Both of them went faster but the OS
backup went from 30 GB/hr to over 130 GB/hr. The DB backup went from about 45
GB/hr to around 65 GB/hr.
K
Robert Ouzen Ouzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
So if I understand when you change the OS lanfree ba
Hi
So if I understand when you change the OS lanfree backup with
LANFREECOMMMETHOD of SharedMem the backup was FASTER , did you do the same with
the DB2 or still LANFREECOMMMETHOD of TCPIP
Regards
Robert Ouzen
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Curious that I'm replying to my own post but using the LANFREECOMMMETHOD of
SharedMem the 120 GB of OS data just backed up in 57 minutes. The 60 GB of DB2
data backed up in 54 minutes.
So looks like the V5.3.3.0 storage agent is more affected by the use of
SharedMem over TCPIP. Or, someth
Check out technote 1191345.
__
John Monahan
Senior Consultant Enterprise Solutions
Computech Resources, Inc.
Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109
Cell: 952-221-6938
http://www.computechresources.com
goc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:46, LeBlanc, Patricia wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why it is that when I start the Storage Agent (W2K3
> client) v5.2.2.5 in the background, I have 4 sessions that start on the
> TSM Server (AIX) v5.2.2.5.?
These are server sessions. Somehow the storage agent and the TS
I can't tell you why but I can say that we have always seen that as well. Right when
you start the storage agent you have 4 sessions on the TSM Server. After time though
or if you stop and start the TSM server while the storage agent is running it can drop
to 1 session. It never seemed to cau
Hi Joni
If you are using IBM LTO2 drives, only the Atape driver or its Solaris
equivalent have to be installed. As for the Version levels for server and
storage agent, checkout the 5.2.3.0 readme file, there has been some
improvement as to what is supported.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tiv
I downloaded these products (with Passport Advantage site):
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for SANS Managed Systems for SAN on UNIX V5.2.2,
Multi-Language (C566MML)
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for SANS Managed Systems for SAN on Windows V5.2.2,
Multi-Language (C566LML)
Jeroen
-Original Messa
CRC,
try the following links:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMStorageManagerforHP-UX5.1.html
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMTivoliStorageManagerforWindows5.1.html
Best regards,
Wolfgang Bayrhof
- Original Message -
From: "Chandrashekar, C. R. (Chandrasekhar)" <
>>PTF == "Program Temporary Fix"
>>4.2.2.0, 5.2.1.0, etc., are PTFs
>>
>>PTF != "Patch"
>>4.2.2.6, 5.2.1.1, etc. are patches (or "interim fixes", as we are now
>>being asked to call them)
>From my past knowledge of AIX the patches were called PTFs. Something like
>4.2.1.1, 4.3.3.27 or 5.1.0.38 of
eck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.10.2003 19:11
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Storage agent different version from TSM server.
PTF ==
Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Storage agent different version from TSM server.
PTF == "Program Temporary Fix"
4.2.2.0, 5.2.1.0, etc., are PTFs
PTF != "Patch"
4.2.2.6, 5.2.1.1, etc. are patches (or "interim fixes&
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/17/2003 08:47
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Storage agent differrent version from TSM
server.
Quotat
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Storage agent differrent version from TSM server.
Hi,
For versions prior TSM 5.2 TSM Server and Storage Agent must be SAME
versions.
1. A new feature in TSM 5.2 is that there can be different versions for
Server and SA (but I d
Is there a way to tell the version of the storage agent on the client?
/hector
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: October 16, 2003 4:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage agent differrent version from TSM server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Storage agent differrent version from TSM server.
Hi,
For versions prior TSM 5.2 TSM Server and Storage Agent must be SAME
versions.
1. A new feature in TSM 5.2 is that there can be
Hi,
For versions prior TSM 5.2 TSM Server and Storage Agent must be SAME
versions.
1. A new feature in TSM 5.2 is that there can be different versions for
Server and SA (but I doesn't test it).
2. I doesn't see any information about using TSM Server 5.2 with Storage
Agent 5.1 and I thing that the n
I think you will have to run the dsmc as root.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Hokanson, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Storage Agent Error: ANRD shmcomm.
, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent use
The tape drives have to be
The tape drives have to be available via SAN to the Storage Agent
machine. The data to be backed up up does not.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/02 10:56AM >>>
Hi,
I am confused about Storage Agent use. To use it with SAN, do we have
to keep the data to be backuped on SAN storage or can it be
-
From: Poland, Neil [mailto:Neil.Poland@;ACS-INC.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage Agent tape drive problems
The device names are actually /dev/rmt4, /dev/rmt5, /dev/rmt6, and /dev/rmt7
and I get the error for every one that is already
er 12, 2002 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage Agent tape drive problems
"/dev/rmt*" is a not a valid device name.
"Poland, Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12-Nov-2002 10:33
Plea
ADSM-L
cc:
Subject:Re: Storage Agent tape drive problems
3580 Ultrim LTO drives
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd@;NAPTHEON.COM]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage Agent tape drive problems
W
3580 Ultrim LTO drives
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd@;NAPTHEON.COM]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage Agent tape drive problems
What kind of drives are these?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757
What kind of drives are these?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Poland, Neil [mailto:Neil.Poland@;ACS-INC.COM]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Storage Agent tape drive problems
I have the
with 3rd party copy...
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
630 357 7744 x338
Zlatko
Krastev/ACIT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: storage agent?
> 4. What is this server-less operation? Is this an already implemented
feature in v4.2.1 (new feature in maintenance release ?!?) or just
something planned to be imple
Krastev/ACIT
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent?
Help me to understand and please correct if I am wrong:
1. As far as I know from v4.1 and what I read in v4.2 docs, the storage
agent allows LAN-free (-->) DATA (<--) movement. Meta-data goe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: storage agent?
That will imply 3rd party SCSI copy functionality, which I haven't
seen any indication they have incorporated to TSM.
The physical data will still have to go through the TSM server, within the
SAN environment, before it gets put in a s
>>> Yes, you need the storage agent. It is a cut down TSM server and costs
a
>>> lot more than the LAN client.
>> No. You use the normal TDP for Exchange client along with the
>> base client storage agent.
> Is there a special agent required for MS Exchange in the LAN free
> environment?
Sorr
Yes, you need the storage agent. It is a cut down TSM server and costs a
lot more than the LAN client.
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange RE: storage agent?
> Is ther
, October 17, 2001 10:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent?
That will imply 3rd party SCSI copy functionality, which I haven't
seen any indication they have incorporated to TSM.
The physical data will still have to go through the TSM server, within the
SAN environment, befo
> Is there a special agent required for MS Exchange in the LAN free
> environment?
No. You use the normal TDP for Exchange client along with the
base client storage agent. The trick is to use the
"ENABLELANFREE YES" in the dsm.opt options file.
>From Chapter 1 of the TDP for Exchange 2.2 User's
Is there a special agent required for MS Exchange in the LAN free
environment?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Suad Musovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent?
That will imply
:36PM -0400, Seay, Paul wrote:
> Yes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bern Ruelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: storage agent?
>
>
> Thanks Alex,
>
> Now this is LAN-less backups,
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Bern Ruelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: storage agent?
Thanks Alex,
Now this is LAN-less backups, right? Just metadata going to the server,
all backups going direct from disk to
42 matches
Mail list logo
