Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client

2004-10-27 Thread TSM_User
I haven't seen this whole thread so I bet it was brought up but remember that both the NIC's and the switch connections should be set to link and line speed. So if it is 100 FULL then set everything to 100 FULL including the switch ports. Anything at AUTO AUTO will give you problems. John Nayl

Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client

2004-10-27 Thread John Naylor
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hagery >Last week we did a restore of 15 MB and 4000 small html-files. >The performance was bad, it took 57 minutes to restore the >4000 html-files and 15 MB. > >The back-up is very fast. FTP between client and server is >als

Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client

2004-10-27 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
Of Stapleton, Mark Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hagery >Last week we did a restore of 15 MB and 4000 small html-files. >The perfo

Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client

2004-10-26 Thread Richard Sims
>Last week we did a restore of 15 MB and 4000 small html-files. The >performance was bad, it took 57 minutes to restore the 4000 html-files and >15 MB. > >The back-up is very fast. ... During restore we see no mediawaits, so that's >not the problem. Arrgh: No one who posts a question about restora

Re: Poor restore performance Windows-client

2004-10-26 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hagery >Last week we did a restore of 15 MB and 4000 small html-files. >The performance was bad, it took 57 minutes to restore the >4000 html-files and 15 MB. > >The back-up is very fast. FTP between client and server is