Re: 3583 Meltdown

2005-04-02 Thread Jurjen Oskam
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:10:45PM -0600, Rushforth, Tim wrote: [3584 TapeAlerts] > But we too were getting too many of these useless errors so we decided > to turn tape alert off and only use if we suspect a problem. (Perhaps we > should leave tape alert on but not report on any of the er

Re: 3583 Meltdown

2005-04-02 Thread Jurjen Oskam
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Bill Kelly wrote: > I heard, both Jurjen and I have problems open with IBM hardware support > (personally, I suspect a firmware problem, but obviously that's just an > uneducated guess). I'm now running on 4AP0, a non-released version. The 'silly' TapeAle

Re: 3583 Meltdown

2005-04-01 Thread Rushforth, Tim
report on any of the errors ...) We are on TSM 5.2.2.4 on Windows with SCSI LTO1 and LTO2 in 3584's. Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Bill Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:58 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: 3583 Meltdow

Re: 3583 Meltdown

2005-04-01 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Stewart >Here's an interesting little piece of activity log from one of >my remote >TSM servers Gotta like TapeAlert. Other than being an >amusing way to >start my day, everything checks out OK and I can't believe i

Re: 3583 Meltdown

2005-04-01 Thread Bill Kelly
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Curtis Stewart wrote: > Here's an interesting little piece of activity log from one of my remote > TSM servers Gotta like TapeAlert. Other than being an amusing way to > start my day, everything checks out OK and I can't believe it. [...lots of bogus TapeAlerts omitted...