hmmm,
and now the scary part... my IBM business partner just phoned me a few
days ago to tell me the new licensing-scheme is postponed for TSM. More
details as soon as I've spoken to her in person on monday.
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten
ssage-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
I was a little surprised at Steve's cautious response to my
post. Looking over it I think I unders
I was a little surprised at Steve's cautious response to my
post. Looking over it I think I understand it now, and it makes me
want to emphasize that I'm not advocating just ignoring the issue
("Don't worry about it too much"). Focus on the "too much", not the
"don't worry". :)
If you develop a m
>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:22:28 +1000, Steven Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm not so sure about this. One of our customers took a rather cavalier
> attitude to TSM licencing, and were using about 3 times as many licences
> as they'd paid for. IBM via PriceWaterhouseCoopers came in one da
Allen S. Rout wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:11:03 +1000, Steven Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Again, the product has not been enhanced to automatically collect
and maintain this information, providing a significant overhead for
administrators and a lack of assurance that licencing is *ever
Hee hee!
Dude, you made me laugh - AGAIN!
I like "Boo!" as the best response to a lot of things.!
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Allen S. Rout
Sent: Mon 2/12/2007 12:13 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
nday, February 12, 2007 10:14 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Pricing model for 5.4
>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:11:03 +1000, Steven Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Again, the product has not been enhanced to automatically collect and
> maintain this information, p
>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:11:03 +1000, Steven Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Again, the product has not been enhanced to automatically collect
> and maintain this information, providing a significant overhead for
> administrators and a lack of assurance that licencing is *ever*
> correct. Sure
# of cores
System x same as BladeCenter
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
Ok, this will be my last. Having neve
007 20:29
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Pricing model for 5.4
Ok, this will be my last. Having never seen what we were paying for
licences you can obviously come to the conclusion you have. I can't and
won't post that info but I have data to prove it. I can tell you that
IBM has
r
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Remco Post
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:30 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> Jus
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kelly Lipp
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:06 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
OK, I've resisted as long as I could. As you can all imagine, I have
numerous conflicting thoughts about
rey L.
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Pricing model for 5.4
Luckily I was at the dentist when the first response came out and I've
had time to take a few breaths. I'm on the same page as Tom here. I
think we all know how pricing
ministrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kauffman, Tom
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
We all know software o
ct if I
can't find an indication of pricing first.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 10:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
Fr
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Kauffman, Tom
I second that. In general, my approach is that any product the vendor
is too ashamed to post pricing for is a product not worth considering.
There is no issue of "shame" here.
Buying software at the enterprise level is not like going to
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:23 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
>
> I second the motion, Steve!
>
> TSM should be able to track/mange the license scheme.
> Or they should provide an additional tool to do it - without charging
> y
Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
Just "one" of my pet peves with this product. I just went through this
with someone and it looks to me like the changes that were made since
the last time have d
ystems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Longo
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
I second the motion
Steven Harris wrote:
>
> If anyone has been able to find the PVU detail could they please post it
> for those of us who don't have access to Passport Advantage?
>
You reseller should have the info, and provide it to you on request.
Since you only need the info when buying new licenses, I see no pr
I second the motion, Steve!
TSM should be able to track/mange the license scheme.
Or they should provide an additional tool to do it -
without charging you $100K for the tool!
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
P
Hi All,
I was looking at the TSM 5.4 announcement letter and notice that 5.4 now
attracts "Processor Value Unit" pricing. The (AP) announcement letter
points you to the PVU announcement letter AP06-0154, which contains a
lot of justification and not much else. It in turn points you to a
website
22 matches
Mail list logo
