[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ERLING.COM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Migration 4.2 to 5.3
EDU
13/08/2004 09:23
harles [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 6:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Migration 4.2 to 5.3
>
> RUn "cleanup backupgroups" prior to upgrade as it cleans out a bug where
> win2k sysobj do not expire to the policies.
>
>
to latest supported
release!
> -Original Message-
> From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 6:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Migration 4.2 to 5.3
>
> Hi Jack!
> I wouldn't use 5.3. It
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 13:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migration 4.2 to 5.3
It is time upgrade :-)
I currently have 4.2.1.3 on a windows 2K server. Going to upgrade to a Win
2003 server with the latest serv
D]
Subject: Migration 4.2 to 5.3
It is time upgrade :-)
I currently have 4.2.1.3 on a windows 2K server. Going to upgrade to a Win
2003 server with the latest server (5.3 I think)
Does anyone know of any upgrade problems with making that big of a jump?
Even 'it would have been smoother/
It is time upgrade :-)
I currently have 4.2.1.3 on a windows 2K server. Going to upgrade to a Win
2003 server with the latest server (5.3 I think)
Does anyone know of any upgrade problems with making that big of a jump?
Even 'it would have been smoother/easier if I had ...' stories?
... Jac
