days you're the windshield" - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of goc
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:20 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
hi, did you found APAR number ?
thanks.
- Or
Message -
From: "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
Bill Boyer reported a similar problem on this list a couple of weeks ago.
He said he had a PMR open with IBM and had not been resolved:
htt
-
From: "Richard Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
On Sep 7, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Goran wrote:
...i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Generation 1 drive cannot suppor
hi, did you found APAR number ?
thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "William Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
The problem I had was trying to do a move data from and LTO-1 tape to an
LTO-3. T
On Sep 7, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Goran wrote:
...i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Generation 1 drive cannot support LTO Ultrium
Generation 2
media. For this reason, you cannot mix Ultrium Generation 1 and
Ultrium
Generation 2 media in a storage pool that shares both Ultri
---
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Longo
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
I have a PMR open with Tivoli also and have gotten similar answer to Bill's. No
clear explanation why, tho
DSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prather,
Wanda
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
Bill Boyer reported a similar problem on this list a couple of weeks ago.
He said he had a PMR open with IBM an
f Of goc
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:06 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
hi, thanks for answering
but.
i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Generation 1 drive cannot support LTO Ultrium Generation 2
media. For this reason, you can
age-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of goc
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:06 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
hi, thanks for answering
but.
i'm confused since tsm53 admin guide says :
"
The LTO Ultrium Gener
dia can be
mounted on Ultrium Generation 2 drives as they become available during mount
point processing. "
hmm ... okay , i'll try further
goran
- Original Message -
From: "Otto Schakenbos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 1:02 PM
Sub
0 are LTO1 drives
elements from 261-274 are LTO3 drives
why does it push LTO3 tape into LTO1 drive for labeling ?
hmm, kinda concerned right now :-|
- Original Message - From: "Tomás Hrouda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:07 AM
Subject: Re:
feature) but I dont know if this is your case.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of goc
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
ok, i did some label libvolume and it started
es it push LTO3 tape into LTO1 drive for labeling ?
hmm, kinda concerned right now :-|
- Original Message -
From: "Tomás Hrouda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: LTO3 tapes problem !
Hi Goran,
Yes, you need to do label l
drive? If yes, is it LTO3
or LTO1 drive? I think you cannot label LTO3 tape in LTO1 drive.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of goc
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: LTO3 tapes problem !
hi all,
we added D52 frame with 6 LTO3 drives and 220 LTO3 tapes,
in frame 1 there is 226 LTO1 tapes and 12 LTO1 drives
all went fine, except automatic microcode downgrade on
new frame which resulted into configuration failure coz firmware
on frame 1 was old enough (3480) not to recognize D52 fram
15 matches
Mail list logo
