Yep, that's been our experience as well. At least for LTO, I believe the
VOLSER is written unencrypted so both the library manager and clients can
read it, while the storage pool data are encrypted using the key in the
client database.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:35:15AM -0400, Zoltan Forray
We need to discontinue one of our servers that is an LM and want to make
sure there aren't any gotchas.
The last time I did this many years ago, the process was fairly
straightforward (checkout tapes, define library, paths, drives on target
server, check-in tapes on target server, redo all definit
ote:
> When we were upgrading our large 11 year old DBs from 5.4 to 6.2, we used
> a 6.2 library manager for about a month with no issues.
>
> As a side curiosity question, how big is too large, my biggest 5.4 was a
> little of 250GB and our two 11 year old DBs were over 200GB. No i
When we were upgrading our large 11 year old DBs from 5.4 to 6.2, we used a 6.2
library manager for about a month with no issues.
As a side curiosity question, how big is too large, my biggest 5.4 was a little
of 250GB and our two 11 year old DBs were over 200GB. No issues upgrading.
Andy
Based on this:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21302789
I installed a 6.3.4.0 library manager to handle a handful of 5.5.3.0 library
clients. So far, the only issue we've had is our tape robot falling apart
(unrelated).
-
Cameron Hanover
chano...@umich.edu
"They tha
Hi Steve,
we just went through this for a migration from Windows TSM 5.5.1 to Sun
with TSM 6.3.3. It worked flawlessly, even aligning the storage agents
during the move. We had plan b in case of errors because of support issues
(even starting from scratch would have been feasable), but no problem
rk and wants me to implement
> TSM for VE as quickly as possible since most of those V5 clients are (now)
> virtualized Windows and Linux boxes.
>
> There are dual sites with TS3500s and TSS1120/1140 drives, with a library
> manager on each. I'd be mad to install anything oth
/1140 drives, with a library
manager on each. I'd be mad to install anything other than TSM for VE at
6.4, so I'll need the TSM for VE instance to be 6.3.4. This forces the
library manager to also be 6.3.4, but library manager/library client is
only supported at n+1, so the V5 librar
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Huebner, Andy
Verzonden: zondag 21 april 2013 10:21
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager question
We have used the refreshstate option several times with our VTLs when we add
slots. It works well.
TSM 6.2
Andy Huebner
-Original
how it knows. Then you run CHECKIN on the
>Library Manager. Just remember: The Library Manager owns the LIBVOLS
>and
>the DRIVES, and the Library Client owns the VOLUMES.
>
>It's all pretty well described in "TSM Administrators Guide". It even
>contains a step-by-st
This thread has strayed.
There's no special magic here. On the client server, you define the
library as SHARED. That's how it knows. Then you run CHECKIN on the
Library Manager. Just remember: The Library Manager owns the LIBVOLS and
the DRIVES, and the Library Client owns the VOLUMES.
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager question
Haven't tried it, but I'm quite eager to hear what from you once you're done.
It doesn't seem to be very complicated to implement and I've always wondered
why TSM requires a restart when changing anything in the library co
the AUDIT LIBRARY command with REFRESHSTATE=YES? I
> stumbled upon this new option in this doc:
>
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21203271
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Remco Post wrote:
>
>> On 18 apr. 2013, at 16:50, "Heikel, Cory" wro
wrote:
> On 18 apr. 2013, at 16:50, "Heikel, Cory" wrote:
>
> > I am trying to bring up a library manager to share my 3584 between 2 tsm
> servers. My question is this:
> >
> > How do I tell the library client that all the tapes for a certain
> storage
On 18 apr. 2013, at 16:50, "Heikel, Cory" wrote:
> I am trying to bring up a library manager to share my 3584 between 2 tsm
> servers. My question is this:
>
> How do I tell the library client that all the tapes for a certain storage
> pool are now "contained&q
A storage pool is bound to a single device class, and that device class
is bound to a single library. This means that whatever device class a
storage pool is in, will point either to a local library or to a managed
library.
If you're migrating from one library manager to another, you can sp
I am trying to bring up a library manager to share my 3584 between 2 tsm
servers. My question is this:
How do I tell the library client that all the tapes for a certain storage pool
are now "contained", for lack of a better word, on the library manager? If it
were on the same serv
y issues specific to library sharing. Everything usually just
works unless the library manager is down or rmts have shuffled.
2. Where do you start if you're running commands to see if things "look good"?
From the documentation it looks like they are typically all run from the
Library
ripts which run in the library manager to give the status of things.
First, 'qdr'. It selects from the drives and paths table to get the status of
each drive.
It also calls a script in the clients to get info about what they are doing
with the drives.
Notice that it finds an error, a pat
to the manager/client
setup/communication if any and what commands do you run to see if everything
'looks good"?
2. Where do you start if you're running commands to see if things "look good"?
From the documentation it looks like they are typically all run from the
Hi, once in a while the network connecting the library manager with
the clients goes down and often this means we have to do a
synchronization(audit).
Any tricks out there so we won't have to dismount and shut down
everything to do an audit?
Any way to make the library manager function
Library manager
TSM NDMP is always tied to the library manager. You can NOT perform ndmp
backups on a library client.
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
ruud.meule...@tatasteel.com
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
01/11/2012 10:01 AM
Please
Hi
Since you also have to define paths for the datamover, dont you have to define
it to the library manager (which usually controls all the drive paths and the
mounts in the library) ?
When you asked about library manager / library client I'm assuming you're in a
multi-TSM server e
You can do that on the Library Client.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Meuleman, Ruud <
ruud.meule...@tatasteel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are going to configure datamover for backup with ndmp. Where do I
> have to define the datamover? TSM Library Manager or TSM Library Client
Hi,
We are going to configure datamover for backup with ndmp. Where do I
have to define the datamover? TSM Library Manager or TSM Library Client?
Kind Regards,
Ruud Meuleman
**
This transmission is confidential and must
pport NPIV. The
StorageAgent was throwing a errors that it couldn't find the serial number
of the tape drive that the library manager selected for use. We upgraded
to v5.5.1 and the problem was resolved.
To help figure out the problem you're going to have to piece together a
full view of what
e going offline
> very frequently from library manager.
>
>
> aix-5.5
>
> the paths which are going offline are library clients in that library
> manager.
>
> there is no much drives going offline.
>
> no rmt mismatch found and no other issues from server end.
>
> Thanks
> Yuvaraja
>
Hi All,
Any body know what could be the problem if the paths are going offline
very frequently from library manager.
aix-5.5
the paths which are going offline are library clients in that library
manager.
there is no much drives going offline.
no rmt mismatch found and no other issues
That's cool!
Now our old TSM 5.3 is the library manager of a TSM 6.2 and it works
perfect.
Both are on AIX.
Cheers,
Mehdi
upgraded to 6.2
On Apr 20, 2011 1:45 AM, "Mehdi Salehi" wrote:
> Hi,
> Can an old TSM server like TSM 5.3 be the library manager server of a TSM
> 6.2 server?
> Tape library is IBM TS3310 with LTO4 drives
> library manager server: AIX 5.3 + TSM 5.3
> library manager client:
Thank you Kurt,
The production system is TSM 5.3 that should be replaced by 6.2 gradually.
There is currently one tape drive, so impossible to have dedicated libraries
for old and new system.
As older version cannot be the library manager, what do you think if new TSM
becomes library manager
No, the TSM version of the library manager should be equal or higher as those
of the library clients.
Regards,
Kurt
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Mehdi Salehi
Verzonden: woensdag 20 april 2011 7:41
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi,
Can an old TSM server like TSM 5.3 be the library manager server of a TSM
6.2 server?
Tape library is IBM TS3310 with LTO4 drives
library manager server: AIX 5.3 + TSM 5.3
library manager client: AIX 6.1 + TSM 6.2
Thank you,
Mehdi
dsmserv format activelogsize=2048
On 3 dec 2010, at 06:21, James R Owen wrote:
> Are you running a simple TSMv6 Library Manager (LM) service?
>
> I am trying to configure a minimal TSMv6.2 LM service and wondering,
> what are minimal workable TSMv6.2 DB, Log, and Archlog
Are you running a simple TSMv6 Library Manager (LM) service?
I am trying to configure a minimal TSMv6.2 LM service and wondering,
what are minimal workable TSMv6.2 DB, Log, and Archlog allocations?
We're running an active TSMv5.5 LM service under AIX6.1 for some years now
using <1GB eac
how many mounts / minute or hour you're doing?
The requirements for a library manager serving 2 TSM servers with one library
and 200 slots is abit different from a LM instance serving 10 TSM servers with
4 libraries and 10.000 volumes :)
Generally, the Library Manager instance doesnt requi
I have an AIX-server with 8G RAM and two TSMv6 instances, one of them a
library manager. The library manager has capped DBMEMPERCENT=12. I have also
set up a dedicated configuration manager(which should be comparable to a lib
manager) in a VM with 2008R2 with 2G of RAM.
Both works fine.
Hans Chr
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
2010-11-04 16:19
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] tsm v6 mem requirements for dedicated library manager instance
Hi,
We are looking at purchasing new AIX servers for our TSM systems. These
need
Hi,
We are looking at purchasing new AIX servers for our TSM systems. These
need to cover our eventual TSM v6 conversion. The one area where we're
confused is our library manager instance.
Any suggestions on the memory needs for a v6 dedicated library manager TSM
instance?
Thanks
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: New to TSM on AIX and using TSM as Library Manager
Hello,
We have been running TSM on MVS for 15 years, using CA-1 as our Tape
Management system without any problems, but we have recently been
working on moving to TSM on AIX. We have a TS3500 Tape Library and we
are
Hello,
We have been running TSM on MVS for 15 years, using CA-1 as our Tape Management
system without any problems, but we have recently been working on moving to TSM
on AIX. We have a TS3500 Tape Library and we are using our new TSM server as
the Library Manager. We also are using TSMManager
. One of the methods
we are considering for doing this is to use a TSM 6 library manager
at the new data center to control sharing of the existing 3494 tape
library and its drives. This raises an obvious question: how would
our current TSM server be able to function after a disaster at the
new data
Hi Thomas,
That is correct, you can run the Library manager server on a different
platform.
I think you will have problem to run TSM under VMware. Probably much easier in
XEN because you can give direct access to hardware in XEN.
To get VMware to get direct access via SAN to your library is
My employer is planning to migrate our computing infrastructure
to a pair of new data centers, each with a Version 6 TSM server
running under mainframe Linux, each writing copy pool volumes on
tape drives at the other site, and each with a library manager
instance of TSM to control sharing of tape
> My assumption is that the 6.x server instance cannot be managed by the
> current 5.4.2.0 library manager.
You are correct. The
library manager must be at the some or highest level of all library
clients and storage agents.
> Can a TSM 6.x Library Manager manage 5.x TSM server
We have approx. 12 TSM Server 5.4.2.0 instances, all being managed by a
single TSM Server / Library Manager also 5.4.2.0
We'd like to add a new TSM 6.x server instance into the environment.
My assumption is that the 6.x server instance cannot be managed by the
current 5.4.2.0 li
>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:28:20 +0200, Ulf Troppens said:
>> And TSM V6 doesn't run on Z-series.
> Both TSM V6 and IRMM are available for Linux on System z.
I stand corrected. I didn't glean this from the IRMM site.
- Allen S. Rout
April 08, 2009 3:24 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library management for dual data center (Active
log for library manager)
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:33:00 +0200, Ulf Troppens
said:
> for managing tape libraries in a dual data center you may take a
> look at IRMM.
Hi Allen,
> I think you are not considering what a 'tape library manager' does in
> the TSM world. The behavior you discuss is not likely to be useful in
> the case the Original Poster was describing.
>
> The key advantage to IRMM is that it presents varying resources in
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:33:00 +0200, Ulf Troppens said:
> for managing tape libraries in a dual data center you may take a
> look at IRMM. IRMM can replace the TSM Library Manager, increasing
> the high-availability of tape resources for TSM and other
> applications.
I
>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:41:24 -0400, Thomas Denier
>> said:
> I am in the process of planning a TSM configuration for dual data
> centers. I expect to have one instance of the TSM server code at
> each data center dedicated to the library manager function for the
> a
Hi Thomas,
for managing tape libraries in a dual data center you may take a look at
IRMM. IRMM can replace the TSM Library Manager, increasing the
high-availability of tape resources for TSM and other applications.
For instance, IRMM can integrate the tape drives and the tape cartridges of
On 7 apr 2009, at 20:41, Thomas Denier wrote:
I am in the process of planning a TSM configuration for dual
data centers. I expect to have one instance of the TSM server
code at each data center dedicated to the library manager
function for the automatic tape library at that site. Based
on
I am in the process of planning a TSM configuration for dual
data centers. I expect to have one instance of the TSM server
code at each data center dedicated to the library manager
function for the automatic tape library at that site. Based
on reports from other sites that have set up library
response: I've been out sick.
We're pretty basic in architecture; though I'm about to switch a
little. I've got one p630 with a RIO drawer (IBM AIX hardware) with
one library manager instance and a passel of (as I call them)
"customer-facing" instances.
The cus
quot;
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] TSM library manager instance
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:59:09 -0400, Mark Devine
said:
> (AIX 5.3 / TSM 5.4.3)
> Any snags with adding a library manager TSM server instance alongside an
> active TSM server on the same host? T
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:59:09 -0400, Mark Devine said:
> (AIX 5.3 / TSM 5.4.3)
> Any snags with adding a library manager TSM server instance alongside an
> active TSM server on the same host? They will share HBAs, NICs, etc.
> The current TSM server is clustered (HACMP)
)20
Mobile:+31 (0)6 51 29 88 01
Mail: karel@atosorigin.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Devine
Sent: maandag 16 maart 2009 15:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM library manager instance
Hey folks,
(AIX
Hey folks,
(AIX 5.3 / TSM 5.4.3)
Any snags with adding a library manager TSM server instance alongside an
active TSM server on the same host? They will share HBAs, NICs, etc.
The current TSM server is clustered (HACMP), so I'm proposing moving these
in tandem during a failover.
-- Mark
The renaming-of-rmts makes me shiver, for what are atavistic reasons,
I guess.
I keep track of the same mappings: "This serial number has this
physical location, and is this drive name on the lib manager". But I
keep it in a little csv file,
DRIVE0,07892730,460,new
DRIVE1,07892835,470,n
o4_f1_d10 0G-09 0007854530
lto4_f1_d11 lto4_f1_d11 0G-09 0007854519
lto4_f1_d12 lto4_f1_d12 0G-09 0007854527
root#
Best Regards,
John D. Schneider
Phone: 314-364-3150
Cell: 314-750-8721
Email: john.schnei...@mercy.net
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@v
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:41 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library Manager
At 03:17 PM 3/10/2009, Schneider, John wrote:
>Greetings,
> I have a solution to the problem of library sharing and
>different rmt names.
At 03:17 PM 3/10/2009, Schneider, John wrote:
Greetings,
I have a solution to the problem of library sharing and
different rmt names.
We have a similar, but different solution. We have a script we use to
rename AIX tape devices to a predictable name, based on the last 4
characters of
ay, March 10, 2009 1:28 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library Manager
Thanks to all because of your emails you got me looking at how I created
the paths and this is where my problem was. I had the name reversed.
Once I changed this things started working.
Marshael
-
Abid Ilias
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM Library Manager
Also turn the SAN Discovery option ON, we have figured out that the only
way SAN Discovery would work was to run TSM as Root in UNIX. If you
have SAN Discovery option ON, it is supposed to
Also turn the SAN Discovery option ON, we have figured out that the only way
SAN Discovery would work was to run TSM as Root in UNIX. If you have SAN
Discovery option ON, it is supposed to fix any discrepancy.
I would make a spread sheet of all devices for library manager/client and
update
Are you comparing the element number/serial number on each rmt device on the
client with the path definition for the client on the library manager. rmt2 on
the manager is not necessarily the same as rmt2 on the client and the path
statements on the library manager have to resolve any
x7105
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Morris.Marshael
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:11 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library Manager
I checked the drives to see what element numbers they
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:04 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM Library Manager
I've seen something similar in the non sharing environment if the
element number to drive relationship is whacked. For instance, you
suggest that the drive at /rmt0 is element 256 when in reality it&
Behalf Of
Morris.Marshael
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:24 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Library Manager
I have setup a library manager in TSM.
This server is TSM 5.5.2
I am setting up a library client and it also has TSM 5.5.2.
The TSM library manager is using the driv
I have setup a library manager in TSM.
This server is TSM 5.5.2
I am setting up a library client and it also has TSM 5.5.2.
The TSM library manager is using the drives with no problem.
I have setup the paths for the library client and I'm having problems
with the client.
The server,
We currently have an IBM 3494 which has the WEB Specialist component. We
would like to get this working. Yes, We activated via the manual but I
have not been able to find out (yes, I've looked on the WEB w/o success)
and through tons of manuals(IBM). My questions are:
1) Has anyone used/using this
Did you know the "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager: How to Migrate the Library
Manager Function" Redpaper ?
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp0140.html
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
David E Ehresman a écrit :
> I am in the process of setting up a test li
On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Library Manager/Client setup
I am in the process of setting up a test library manager/client where
both tsm servers run on the same aix box. After completing my setup, I
try to do a
I am in the process of setting up a test library manager/client where both tsm
servers run on the same aix box. After completing my setup, I try to do a
"backup db type=full devc=vtl1" on the client. I get the following error
message:
ANR4571E Database backup/restore terminated - in
The library manager allocates the drives to the server instances that
request mounts. If more mounts are requested than there are available
drives, then the most recent mount requests have to wait until a drive
becomes available. This is a pretty common occurrence in our environment
at certain
did this we would set up a
third server to act as a library manager for the other two. We
would want to be able to adjust the number of tape drives available
to each server to adjust to variations in the workload. This would
be done by adjusting the mountlimit settings for the tape device
classes
m.conf from a
template and the output of `elm_match_device -d tsm -Z`, which works
great. Remember that in a TSM library manager situation, you'll find
yourself doing the exact same thing, but without the handy tools.
Come to think of it, EDT does provide some features that are a must-
have to Ian's
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alex Paschal
> I don't know what Mark meant about inability to use the library due to
> resyncing TSM to Gresham. I don't recall ever syncing TSM with EDT,
it
> wasn't necessary since ACSLS was managing the library, but I suppose
earning curve and having to pay for
and support another piece of software. I found Gresham support
responsive and knowledgeable. To tell the truth, I wish IBM would use
an external library manager as well. It's nice to have the basic
built-in library management functionality in TSM, but real
Accepted that the Single Point of Failure of using a single TSM Library manager
instance is a risk. It seems that this is the major benefit of Gresham- its
ability to distribute shared library control. This then needs to be considered
against cost.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
We did same recently, we moved from LibStation/zOS to ACSLS/AIX, works well.
-Message d'origine-
De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Costa,
Justino
Envoyé : jeudi 20 novembre 2008 14:14
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library mana
Hi
I disagree. Except the price tag ...
Unfortunatelly, TSM built-in library manager is not smart enough for large
ACSLS libraries.
How do you handle multiple ACSLS scratch pools without external library manager
(Gresham or whatever) ?
What path optimization can be done without external
MAIL PROTECTED]
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.logica.com/pt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ian Smith
Sent: quinta-feira, 20 de Novembro de 2008 12:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library manager v Gresham
Tha
On 20 nov 2008, at 13:40, Mark Stapleton wrote:
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian Smith
What experiences do people have of library/drive control for SL8500?
I am trying to work out the pros and cons of either using TSM Library
manager with ACSLS or the
o de 2008 12:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library manager v Gresham
Thanks
Do you currently use TSM Library Manager with ACSLS?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Stapleton
Sent: 20 November 2008 1
Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:54 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library manager v Gresham
>
> Thanks
>
> Do you currently use TSM Library Manager with ACSLS?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Thanks
Do you currently use TSM Library Manager with ACSLS?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: 20 November 2008 12:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Library manager v Gresham
From: ADSM: Dist
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian Smith
> What experiences do people have of library/drive control for SL8500?
>
> I am trying to work out the pros and cons of either using TSM Library
> manager with ACSLS or the Gresham agents. Does anyone have
Hi
What experiences do people have of library/drive control for SL8500?
I am trying to work out the pros and cons of either using TSM Library
manager with ACSLS or the Gresham agents. Does anyone have any thoughts
or experiences regarding performance, stability, ease of use etc
] TSM Library Manager
What's the best documentation to look at to get a basic understanding
on how to set up a Library Manager server? TSM servers are 5.4 and
5.5
running on AIX.
David
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+31 6 248 21 622
Behalf
> Of David E Ehresman
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:20 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Library Manager
>
> What's the best documentation to look at to get a basic understanding
> on how to set up a Library Manager server? TSM ser
What's the best documentation to look at to get a basic understanding on how to
set up a Library Manager server? TSM servers are 5.4 and 5.5 running on AIX.
David
Thanks to everyone for all of the advice. My vendor has now assigned a new TSM
technician that knows about the Library Manager. Now, another issue has come
up about this.
I have 6 LAN-free clients, one of them is running on AIX in an HA environment.
I am assuming that all of the drives
rary configuration
> > has the library shared but it is not a library manager since we only
had one
> > server.
So, did you have multiple tsm instances on the server, each with their own
3584 partition and dedicated drives?
> > I sent him documentation and they also found
>
tabase,
> 228GB. We have finally received approval to move this to a new server,
> upgrade to 5.5 and split the clients up to reduce the DB size. We would
> like to have 4 LPAR's created on the new server, 1 for a Library manager and
> the other 3 for client databases. Our libr
We origionally had 2 (at different datacenters) big TSM instances (+150gb
db each), each with their own library. In preparation for adding new
instances we converted to standalone library manager instances (one at each
site), then brought on new instances. It all worked very well. There are
a
Morning can you point me to the library manager Redbook please?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Haberstroh, Debbie (IT)
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 3:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library Manager
Thanks, hadn't thought about the restartable restores, good idea.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:07 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library Manager and Migr
Hi Debbie,
There is absolutely no reason why you can't separate your current
configuration into a Library manager and library client without losing data.
IMHO the vendor that you hired does not seem really understand how TSM
works. I recently had to do something similar here at UC Ber
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
