On Apr 10, 2006, at 8:13 AM, David E Ehresman wrote:
If a primary storage volume is marked as status=destroyed will the
files
on that tape be backed up in the next backup cycle if they still
exist?
Or must you do a delete volume discard=yes before the files are
eligilble for re-backup?
David -
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Destroyed tape
If a primary storage volume is marked as status=destroyed will the files
on that tape be backed up in the next backup cycle if they still exist?
Or must you do a delete volume discard=yes before the files are
eligilble for re-backup?
David
you should do a restore storagepool to recreate the volume from the
copypool. TSM will them backup any that were not restored on the next
backup.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/10/06 8:13 AM >>>
If a primary storage volume is marked as status=destroyed will the
files
on that tape be backed up in the nex
If a primary storage volume is marked as status=destroyed will the files
on that tape be backed up in the next backup cycle if they still exist?
Or must you do a delete volume discard=yes before the files are
eligilble for re-backup?
David
Hi Laura,
It is more helpful when making technical inquiries to include all the
specific information about your problem, including the full text of the
message you are receiving. :-)
In this case, I am guessing that you are receiving message ANR1425W. If
so, the information for this message that
o a "delete vol
discardd=yes" and then change it to readwrite.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura Lantz
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Destroyed Tape
Hi All!
I have a ta
Hi All!
I have a tape marked "Destroyed" but can'not delete it because it is
"mountablenotinlib". The tape is
long gone, but I would like to delete it.
Many Thanks,
Laura
02:06 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Recovering destroyed tape
On Sep 9, 2004, at 12:28 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> We recently had a tape eaten by one of our 3590 drives. ...
We don't
On Sep 9, 2004, at 12:28 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
We recently had a tape eaten by one of our 3590 drives. ...
We don't know the nature of that damage, but it's worth reminding
3590 customers that tapes can sometimes be repaired, if the damage
was to the leading end of the tape: in this case,
First, I would go back through the log during the restore process and see why files
couldn't be restored.
I have had to do the restore twice sometimes. For some reason, the first preview=yes
doesn't call for all the offsite volumes it needs.
Hope this helps.
Gary Lee
Senior Operating Systems
>>How do I figure out what wasn't restored ?
Try a "Q CONT volser" on the bad tape.
David
>>>How do I figure out what wasn't restored ? Everything should have been
on the offsite tapes ?
Just list the contents of the "destroyed" tape:
q content vv
Everything that is left on vv, are files that could not be recreated
elsewhere by the RESTORE VOLUME.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
>We recently had a tape eaten by one of our 3590 drives.
>
>This tape was a primary storage volume.
>
>I dutifully did the RESTORE xx PREVIEW=YES and had them
>bring back the 24-offsite tapes it wanted.
We recently had a tape eaten by one of our 3590 drives.
This tape was a primary storage volume.
I dutifully did the RESTORE xx PREVIEW=YES and had them bring back the
24-offsite tapes it wanted.
However, eventhough the restore supposedly went successfull, I got the
error message that "some f
14 matches
Mail list logo
