Thanks to all who responded to my problem.
Defragmenting the database using UNLOADDB/LOADDB seemed to solve
my problem.
Adjusting some settings in DSMSERV.OPT and installing the newest 4.2 client
further improved performance.
Thanks for your support!
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
---
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 15.01.2002 20:46:23
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Bad performance after upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0
Hi TSM-ers,
we upgraded a few days ago from TSM 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0. T
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: bcc: Subject: AW: Bad performance after upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0 Dwight,thanks for your response.Unfortunately I'm not allowed to install anything on our TSM machine.It's a bundle of hard- and software called NSM (networ
CTED] cc: bcc: Subject: Re: AW: Bad performance after upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0 On a regular TSM installation those parms from Ben's email are set inrc.adsmserv. Have you checked to see if they're set in startadsm? If not,sounds like time to lodge a complaint with SSD.__
Dwight,
thanks for your response.
Unfortunately I'm not allowed to install anything on our TSM machine.
It's a bundle of hard- and software called NSM (network storage manager).
Our IBM hardware engineer installed ECA level 16. No newer level seemed
to bee available.
I will try the server option S
ology, Inc
"Rupp Thomas
(Illwerke)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Bad performance after
upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor
em.
Ben
Micron Technology Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bad performance after upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0
Hi TSM-ers,
we upgraded a few days ago from TSM 3.7.2.0 t
02 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bad performance after upgrading from 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0
Hi TSM-ers,
we upgraded a few days ago from TSM 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0. This upgrade was
done by our
IBM CE (it's a NSM with an 3494 ATL).
After the upgrade the performance dropped dramatically. I think
Hi TSM-ers,
we upgraded a few days ago from TSM 3.7.2.0 to 4.1.1.0. This upgrade was
done by our
IBM CE (it's a NSM with an 3494 ATL).
After the upgrade the performance dropped dramatically. I think it's a
problem with the
database because the cache hit rate dropped below 95% - it was in the 99%
