ined in hopes others find it helpful.
>
> ~Rick
>
>
> -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent:
> Sunday, March 08, 2015 5:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject:
> Re: [ADSM-L] DB2/Oracle backup repor
, 2015 5:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
Rick,
It's a problem, everywhere, no matter how you do it.
* The simplistic answer to your question is yes; the external scheduler
is running a list of tasks; after the last ta
DSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick
Adamson
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
I assume someone has dealt with this I would like to hear how they handled it.
The issue:
DB2 and
lto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Rick Adamson
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:38 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
>
> Rick,
> This all began after a recent audit revealed many systems either had
> missed backup sch
:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick
Adamson
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:38 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
Rick,
This all began after a recent audit revealed many systems either had missed
backup schedules, excessive retention, or no bac
: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
Our Oracle backups have three scenarios.
1) Home grown scripts are scheduled via cron on the Oracle server,
copy/compress the db to local disk, then pushed the db backup to
Behalf Of Rick
Adamson
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DB2/Oracle backup reporting and scheduling
I assume someone has dealt with this I would like to hear how they handled it.
The issue:
DB2 and/or Oracle database backups that are dependent on completion of
I assume someone has dealt with this I would like to hear how they handled it.
The issue:
DB2 and/or Oracle database backups that are dependent on completion of external
processes.
Currently our DBA's utilize a variety of methods to initiate DB2 and Oracle
database backups (CRON, external sched
there.
I'll keep working at it.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Iain Barnetson
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NDMP backup reporting.
Ben,
This si
KUP' or activity='NAS Backup') -
order by start, node_name
Regards,
Iain Barnetson
IT Systems Administrator
UKN Infrastructure Operations
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Bullock
Sent: 28 April 2005 23:27
T
I know that many of us in TSM land have started to jump on the
NDMP bandwagon, me included. I have a few questions that I'm hoping
someone else has already figured out. I'm not finding it in the
archives, so I will ask.
Basically it has to do with the scheduling and reporting of th
[ This is a one-time announcement that is being sent to lists where the
topic of backup reporting
has come up in the past. Apologies to any who consider it to be off-topic. ]
A new list has been created specifically for the discussion of
backup-reporting issues:
http://www.openbackup.org
After upgrading to 5.1.5.1 I now find a strange status in the backup report.
I'd also like to mention that we had an unusually high amount of failures
and missed backups last night too.
Query is this:
q event * * begindate=today-1 begintime=16:00 enddate=today endtime=now
Output is this:
10/23/20
-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Réf. : Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
Just got word from Tivoli that APAR IC34462: BYTES FIELD IN SUMMARY TABLE
SHOWS
t;@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2002-09-20 10:36:12
Veuillez répondre à "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet : Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
28.09.2002 03:12
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
I get
select sum(cast(bytes/1024/1024/1024 as decimal(6,3))) Total GB
==
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Seay, Paul wrote:
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:57:53 -0400
> From: "Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
is [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
For the record, Servergraph/TSM doesn't use the summary table, so problems
there won't make it give incorrect results.
It uses the accou
8-8478 fax
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bill Boyer
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
>
>
> Yeah, but
The fix for this is at these levels (per apar doc):
Apply patch 4.2.2.5, 5.1.1.1 or higher, available through
Tivoli Web Page to resolve this problem, or fixing
PTF when available.
Here's a blerb from my etr/pmr (problem ticket):
The APAR you are referring to is IC34462. This issue is spec
.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joel Fuhrman
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
To me is seems as though the worker sessions should be in
They are working on a fix.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Joel Fuhrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting: SUMMARY TABLE ISSUE IS FOUND
To
t
> Naptheon Inc.
> 757-688-8180
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Backup reporting
>
>
> Paul and all,
>
> When I attempt
r : "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pour :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet : RE: Réf. : Re: Backup reporting
I believe that this only affects the summary table data, not the accounting
records. The accounting records are correct in the byte counts. I know you
can'
iginal Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Bill Boyer
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Backup reporting
> >
> >
> > There was a problem where
f
> Bill Boyer
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Backup reporting
>
>
> There was a problem where the bytes transferred in the summary table as
> zero. It has been fixed in later patch levels. I'm not sure what the APAR
>
y, September 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Backup reporting
>
>
> There was a problem where the bytes transferred in the summary table as
> zero. It has been fixed in later patch levels. I'm not sure what the APAR
> number is or the level where it was
Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting
Paul and all,
When I attempt to use any of the following select statements my "Total MB"
returned is always 0. I get my list of nodes but there is never any numbers
for size.
Since this is my firs
:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Réf. : Re: Backup
reporting
Stor Ma
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Guillaume Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rif. : Re: Backup reporting
I'm at level 4.2.2.12 of the server on AIX and the summary table problems
are still there. I am currently writing a PMR on this.
Guilla
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet : Re: Backup reporting
There was a problem where the bytes transferred in the summary table as
zero. It has been fixed in later patch levels. I&#
nsmitted field. Something for me to add to my Honey-Do list..:-)
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Bertrand
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting
Pa
mmand line and through macro's.
I am trying this on a W2K TSM v4.2.2 server.
Thanks,
Mark B.
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting
See if these will help:
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup reporting
Hi,
I have a suggestion on how to achieve one consolidated report for TSM.
Unfortunately, I don't have the scripts (anymore), but one
PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Backup reporting
(See attached file: log.txt)
=?iso-8859-1?Q?log.txt?=
Description: Binary data
Simi TEL: +354-569-7700
Borgartun 37105 Iceland
URL:http://www.nyherji.is
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Arty Ecock
Sent: 16. september 2002 13:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Backup reporting
ve not formed */
/* a session in the last 24 hours to 30 days */
select node_name as "Node Name", substr(cast(lastacc_time as char(26)),1,16)
as "Last Access" from nodes where upper(contact) not in ('*SUSPENDED*',
'*RETIRED*') and upper(contact) not like
37 matches
Mail list logo
