I have been reading this thread from the beginning, and I just wanted to
place my "two cents" in here :-)Veritas actually wrote the code for
MS long ago. MS has adopted the basic backup-exec code and improved on
it a bit..This being right from both MS and Veritas techs...
What I hav
On Mar 15, 2004, at 21:33, Paul Fielding wrote:
I would be prepared to assume it. I once tried to contact Veritas for
support when a client was trying to use Backup Exec to backup Exchange
databases to a TSM server. We couldn't get it to talk to the server.
Not
even a peep. Actlog indicate
if
> people can't rely on the quality of the product.
I would be prepared to assume it. I once tried to contact Veritas for
support when a client was trying to use Backup Exec to backup Exchange
databases to a TSM server. We couldn't get it to talk to the server. Not
even a peep. A
you were
backing up.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server
>ok, that assumes that veritas is less able to support their product than
IBM
March 15, 2004 2:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:26:58 -0500
> "Remeta, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Get used to it. Wait until you have a problem with using
> V
currently unable to provide, unless
I do unconventional things. Since SARA is more or less in the buisiness of
doing unconventional things (like running TSM!) this should be no shock
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent:
ckup and/or backup logs from 2 years ago... no wonder the 3 day
thing.
Charlie Hurtubise
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: veritas bac
IL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server
>But still, I have no answer to my experiences question, which is more
>important to me than IBM politics.
Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or which it
t; Duane
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:09:54 -0500
> Richard Sims <[EMAIL PRO
failure.
Duane
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:09:54 -0500
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Th
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:09:54 -0500
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The ability to perform a mailbox backup or restore using backup exec
> >has been around since version 7.0 or earlier, that is at least 5 years.
> ...
>
> Indeed. IBM periodically get
to use its resources
> for support.
>
no they don't, I don't have to pay to IBM for software they didn't
provide
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/15/2004 11:37:35 AM >>>
> Hi all,
>
> one of my users pointed out to me that veritas backup exec 9.1 supp
i all,
one of my users pointed out to me that veritas backup exec 9.1 supports
a
few features that could make this a usefull product for them:
1- restore of single mailboxes or messages in exchange
2- TSM server as storage
3- better centralisation of backup logging for non-TSM administrators
This
>The ability to perform a mailbox backup or restore using backup exec
>has been around since version 7.0 or earlier, that is at least 5 years.
...
Indeed. IBM periodically gets darts when another vendor implements a
database backup/restore capability not in TSM. As you'll find
The ability to perform a mailbox backup or restore using backup exec has
been around since version 7.0 or earlier, that is at least 5 years. It can
will increase the amount of data to be backed up by 5X or more. May work
fine with smaller mail servers but is not feasible in a large environment
Hi all,
one of my users pointed out to me that veritas backup exec 9.1 supports a
few features that could make this a usefull product for them:
1- restore of single mailboxes or messages in exchange
2- TSM server as storage
3- better centralisation of backup logging for non-TSM administrators
from Backup Exec
Hello all, I have not posted here before and I am fairly new to TSM so
please bear with me. I am trying to re use tapes from Backup Exec with
Tivoli 5.1.5. This is a proof of concept server. It has a single manual
DLT drive to use. Many of the Automated library commands are
Hello all, I have not posted here before and I am fairly new to TSM so
please bear with me.
I am trying to re use tapes from Backup Exec with Tivoli 5.1.5. This is a
proof of concept server. It has a single manual DLT drive to use. Many of
the Automated library commands are unavailable with
r the question of TSM vs Backup Exec. Again, it is like
comparing a push scooter to an 18 wheeler. There is little in common other
than both have some axles and wheels.
Alex puts it in perspective pretty well.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: F
Think of backup environments as sorted by size. As a rough guesstimate, and
I'm sure people have different opinions on sizing,
NTBackup is for 1 machine.
Backup Exec is good for 1-10, maybe even 20 machines.
Veritas NetBackup is good for 10-50 machines. (Is anybody having a good
time wi
I've always thought of NTBackup as the push scooter. I think Backup Exec
is more like a Vespa (with apologies to Vespa owners). Much cheaper and
easier to operate than TSM for one user, only able to move one type of
cargo (NT data, and that in small quantities), and much more likely to
This is like asking about a 18 wheeler versus a push scooter. What are you
really interested in finding out?
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Badenhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need info on Tivoli v Backup Exec
Running WinNt and 2000 + SQL 6.5 , SQL 7 and SQL 2000 + Exchange 5.5 and
2000
Hugo Badenhorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+27 11 285 5587
+27 083 442 4958
A few questions related to the above-mentioned:
1. How does TSM handle data that was backed up from a Backup Exec client?
2. Do you register that node on TSM?
3. Can you generate a backup set for that node?
4. Does versioning of files apply to that node?
Any comments will be greatly
Yes. Backup Exec has a TSM interface that will do just what you describe.
I tested it a couple of years ago, worked fine. (We ended up not using it
because there was just too much data to send across our network at the time,
but that was a network issue, not a problem with the Backup Exec
The answer is yes.
You need to define a storage pool for the BE on the TSM server.
See the module for this on the Veritas site.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacques Butcher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â éðåàø 16 2001 8:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Can Backup Exec be setup in such a way that it sends data off to TSM
without having a storage device locally attached to the server it's running
on? I.e. TSM handles the backup device (library) as well as manage all the
volumes.
Any comments will be greatly appreciated
Jacques Butcher.
27 matches
Mail list logo
