No it doesn't. I'm just telling you from experience that when your using software from two different companies that are suppose to work together, you always have a lot of finger pointing going on. It makes getting support much more difficult. One is always saying it's the others fault. Add on to that that the whole thing is not supported by Microsoft and you have a real disaster waiting to happen. If you do decide to go this route I would perform test restores as often as possible to make sure it works! There's nothing worse than not being able to restore what you thought you were backing up.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: veritas backup exec client and TSM server >ok, that assumes that veritas is less able to support their product than IBM >is. Since Veritas is a _big_ player in the back-up market, I'm not ready to >do so just yet. Remember, this is a product in use by at least as may >organisations as TSM is, and it wouldn't be if people can't rely on the >quality of the product. > >Any argument as in 'if the software is upgraded, we need to upgrade the >client', only means exactly that. With win2003 this was true, so why not >with a mail database? I don't see the problem. _My_ problem is that my users >are asking for a functionality that I'm currently unable to provide, unless >I do unconventional things. Since SARA is more or less in the buisiness of >doing unconventional things (like running TSM!) this should be no shock.... Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this material immediately.
