till asking the question... does TOR allow multiple contacts and email
addresses? If so, what is the appropriate syntax?
____
From: Todd Lundstedt
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:47 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM Operational Reporting notification o
In the properties box of the daily report, on the automatic notification
tab, after I "query" the server for the list of nodes and contacts, one
of my nodes doesn't show up with the correct contact information. That
node happens to have multiple contacts; four different contacts. I
remember enter
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stef Coene
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 1:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Server Recovery (AIX)
On Monday 19 September 2005 19:47, Todd Lundstedt wrote:
> This is more along the lines of AIX serv
This is more along the lines of AIX server recovery, but it plays into
TSM, too.
Without using addtional software, just AIX, how does one create a boot
CD that contains all the necessary info to restore a server using a
mksysb tape?
I understand the process for recovering an AIX server from a mks
any issues.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:03 AM
To: 'ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] backup stgpool
Sandra,
As I read through your initial request, it sounds like, every Friday,
you want all of your offsite copy
7;s in
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/ser
ver/NT/5.3.1.5/TSMCON5315_WIN.exe
Bill Boyer
"Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bingo!
Mike and Steve hit it. The password thing was not it, since it does
work for a while. After reading about IC44976, I found the trace file
and could see those error messages in the file. I am off to find the
latest patch for TOR 5.3.
Unfortunately, the files at
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/
TOR is 5.3.1.0, running on W2K3. The hardware also runs ISC/AC, but we
don't use that much.
TOR is set to monitor two TSM servers, one at 5.3, and one at 5.2, both
running AIX, if it matters.
For each TSM server, I have the standard hourly report, and two daily
reports; the standard daily report
build the boot
image once I make that definition.
Using the NIM Master's smit panels, I have tried entering network
identifiers (ent1, etc) into the "Software Install Device" field of
different "Install Client Defaults" panels, but that has not helped.
Any help would be
Sandra,
As I read through your initial request, it sounds like, every Friday,
you want all of your offsite copy pool tapes consolidated onto fewer
tapes. If that is what you are wanting, you can delete vol with
discarddata=yes for each of your offsite pool tapes prior to your backup
stgpool (now t
tried entering network
identifiers (ent1, etc) into the "Software Install Device" field of
different "Install Client Defaults" panels, but that has not helped.
Any help would be appreciated. If you think you could help better via a
phone call, I can place that call. Email me directly with your phone
number.
Thanks in advance,
Todd Lundstedt
Via Christi Regional Medical Center
Wichita KS
TSM server 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.2
BAClient 5.2.2.0 on Windows 2003
I noticed the following in the "help" regarding BACKUP IMAGE:
"Image backup of IBM TotalStorage SAN File Systems is not supported."
... and in the Backup/Archive Installation manual, 5.2.2, Technical
changes for version 5.2.2 - Dec
The only issue we have seen here is NT4 is no longer supported with 5.2
Storage Agent. That hit us hard since we weren't informed of it by the
company that performed the 4.2 -> 5.2 upgrade (with an AIX upgrade as
well). We had to scramble to re-schedule large database servers so all
the databases
TSM 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5200-03
select stgpool_name, migr_mb from stgpools
Why do all but one (sometimes two) of my disk storage pools that migrate
to tape only have "0.0"? It even displays this value when a migration
is in progress, with GBs of data transferred. Am I missing something
here?
The two
;
> This Script will give you the number of volumes per stg and maxscratch
> allocated
>
> select a.stgpool_name,a.maxscratch,count(*) as "Number of Vols"
> from stgpools a, volumes b where a.stgpool_name = b.stgpool_name and
> a.devclass = 'SCALARCLASS' group by a.s
Interesting...
I verified that the define server command used serverpassword= instead of
password=. This "other server" name was defined via the GUI anyway, so it
would make sense that it used the correct syntax (one can assume).
02/11/05 14:31:28 ANR2017I Administrator MYID issued command:
Sorry.. Forgot to mention what I had checked out as a result of the ANR1664W
message...
I have no devtype definitions of "server" (at least, in the GUI, when I go to
"Objects, Server Storage, Device Classes, Server Device Classes", there are no
entries)...
We don't have an event server...
And I
TSM 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.2 ML3
I installed and setup Storage Agent on a W2K node for testing purposes.
Everything tested out fine, and now I am wanting to remove everything,
including the "other server" entry on the TSM server. I have already
uninstalled the Storage Agent and device drivers from
ch
Regards Robert Ouzen
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Lundstedt
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 12:00 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Select for Tape Storage Pool Report
I created this SQL select
I created this SQL select statement...
select -
cast(stgpool_name as char(22)) as "Stg Pool ", -
cast((est_capacity_mb/1024/1024) as decimal(5,2)) as "TB", -
pct_utilized as "Util", -
pct_logical as "Logi", -
cast(recl_running as char(4)) as "Run?", -
cast(reclaim as dec(3)
Is there a release date on this?
I am using 5.2.2.0 on a W2K node (server is 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.2-03). Tried to
do an Image backup and we got a few error messages during the backup. A quick
search at ibm.com returned a single entry that matched my error almost to the
letter, and indicated the pr
Shouldn't you be using the "query occupancy" command?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jones, Eric J
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:54 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Filespace query
Thanks. I can now query the v
OK.. I will look at the manuals again, and see what I have downloaded..
Must have mislabeled one, or something.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Su
Found in the Windows version of "Backup Archive Clients Installation and
User's Guide.pdf", v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value...
Supported Clients
This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define
this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support thi
I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did
that change?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization
Hell
We just moved some of our LANFree W2K and W2K3 clients from one datacenter to
another. The SAN is still in the old datacenter, to LANFree from those clients
is currently impossible (without additional hardware). I instructed the move
team to stop, and disable the StorageAgent service on those
We will be moving our 3584 library (including the TSM server, shark, and
everything else in our data center) across town to a new facility. I am
trying to decide what the best method is to accomplish certain aspects
of the library move. We don't want to leave the tapes in the library
during the m
Client is 5.2.2.9 running on AIX5.2 with HACMP.
On AIX, how do I setup the baclient to recognize more than one node name,
so I can start multiple "dsmc sched" processes; one for the local drives,
and one for each shared resource group (I have made this work on Windows
boxes, but this is the first
I am just trying to consider all the pros/cons of having multiple copy
storage pools per primary pool. I was considering having one copy storage
pool that never gets taken offsite (remains in the library), and two copy
pools that get checked out and set to "offsite". Obviously, the pros are
that,
Thanks, Del.
My comment regarding living with an incomplete/incorrect point of
recovery was solely meant to represent that in a complete data center
wipe-out, the existing full and incrementals that we have offsite would
not accurately represent what was in a particular mailbox at the time of
the
Del,
Thanks.. follow up question...
You said...
>>
Data Protection for Exchange performs incremental and
differential backups by backing up the full
transaction log files to TSM. They are all placed into a
single TSM backup object.
<<
>From this, would it be safe to assume that the data from hundr
Ns
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Lundstedt
>I read through the TDP for Exchange v5.2 documentation. It
>appears that I
>cannot split up the different data types (meta, data, logs)
>into different
>management classes, but I can put the
I am working up my plan to backup our new Exchange 2003 storage groups.
Our environment includes:
Exchange 2003 running on Windows 2003
TSM 5.2.2.5 running on AIX 5.2
Shark storage for the AIX server's disk based storage
EVA (I think) storage for the Exchange server data
LTO1 in a 3584 accessed acr
Well, there it is then. We'll see if TSM support comes back with this bit
of information on their next attempt to "resolve" this issue. Their first
attempt was to tell me that I couldn't move nodedata from a copy storage
pool to another storage pool. I guess they didn't read the entire ESR.
Anyw
Shouldn't it use primary storage volumes to get the data, just like a
reclamation or a move data for acc=offsite volumes?
>But nothing moved. What is wrong?
The tapes are offsite and thus the data can't be moved?
Recently, I moved data for several nodes from one Primary storage pool to
another. That new primary storage pool is backing up to a different copy
storage pool. Data for those servers in the original copy storage pool
(stgpool_name='OFFSITE') is no longer needed. So, I was going to perform
a "mo
Or..
(if your storage pool name is TAPEPOOL, then)
update volume * access=readonly wherestgpool=tapepool
goran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/05/2003 09:16 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext 109
Cell: 952-221-6938
http://www.compures.com
Todd Lundstedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IA-CHRISTI.ORG>To
Sent by: "ADSM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dist Stor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:Re: 3584 Cleaning Frequency
Todd, what kind of tapes do you use (Imation, 3M, IBM, Fuji ?
We had much much more r/o tapes with Imation than with IBM ones !
rené
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundste
Re: 3584 Cleaning Frequency
Todd, what kind of tapes do you use (Imation, 3M, IBM, Fuji ?
We had much much more r/o tapes with Imation than with IBM ones !
rené
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,13. October 2003 18:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
TSM 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10, Fiber Channel HBA, IBM LTO1
We recently upgraded from 4.2.1.7 to 5.1.7.1. I started seeing the
"unavailable" and "read-only" tapes soon after that. I haven't done
anything else to determine the issues. I thought it might be due to dirty
tape drives (recently sent
What is the normal clean frequency for LTO-1 drives in a 3584? I have the
drives defined to TSM with a cleaning frequency of "none", and the 3584
library set to Automatic cleaning, per recommendations. Yet, when I use
the front panel of the 3584 to look at the cleaning cartridges, one has
never b
he Netware volume? I don't
remember
seeing what version of Netware and if you're at a level that supports
this,
but then you can access the Netwar volume from the Windows box without a
Netware client loaded.
Bill Boyer
DSS, INc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manage
Newp..
This NT server is a locked down NAS server. That was option suggested,
investigated, and declined.
We will probably just use multiple workstations to do copies.
Ted Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/29/2003 03:50 PM
Please respond to "AD
Oops.. forgot to mention that.. yeah. we did a restore to a specific
location, with the default path setting. It does look like it is just
reading through the entire tape. This was a backupset of a single
filespace, not everything on the server. So I would hope that it is
merely file/folders on
Although this shouldn't matter, I am running TSM 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3.3.
We are moving a large number and size of files from a Netware server to an
NT server, and I am trying to come up with a way to help the process so we
don't have to use a workstation to copy files from a Netware mount to a
Windo
MTU=Maximum Transmission Unit
and is a parameter of the network card/driver.
"Kamp, Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/23/2003 04:43 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Fax to:
Return the tapes to your library (if you have one) and update each volume
to readonly or readwrite. They will be deleted from the storage pool, and
then you can delete the storage pool.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/23/2003 02:21 PM
Please respond
One option would be to redirect those backups to storage pools that don't
reclaim. Simply let the retention expire the data, and empty the volumes.
It is what I had to do to prevent reclaiming three 280+GB striped files.
Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[E
Yes, but you could stripe the full backup across multiple tape drives (if
you have more than one tape drive). This spreads the database backup
across multiple tapes, and makes reclamation of those files less
problematic. Note: if you stripe a backup, you *must* send the backup to
a collocate=file
TSM 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3.3
I have moved data for several nodes from one primary storage pool to
another primary storage pool. Each of these primaries has a different
copy storage pool defined.
OrigPrimaryStg --> OrigCopyStg
NewPrimaryStg --> NewCopyStg
move nodedata node1,node2 from=OrigPrimaryStg
I can't speak to how different NW 4.10 and 4.11 are. Our Netware guy did
some research, and found that version TSM BA 3.7.x.x (can't remember the
x's) supported NW 3.1, 3.2, 4.11, and some other higher versions, but it
skipped 4.10. TSM BA 3.1.0.8 does specify NW 4.10.
When we installed TSM, star
ients didn't exhibit the problem.
We used the V 5.1 upgrade to get the clients, too, so now almost all of
our clients are running 5.1. We had been running a mix of 3.1, 4.1, and
4.2 clients.
Tab Trepagnier
TSM Administrator
Laitram LLC
Todd Lundstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by
We just upgrade our server version from 4.2.1.7 to 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3.3.
We had to upgrade to stay in support.
The client having problems is 3.1.0.8 running on Netware 4.10 (I
understand Netware 4.10 cannot use TSM B/A Clients higher than 3.1.0.8).
I understand B/A 3.x is way out of support.
This
I had my first experience with 5.2 client code a few weeks ago. We had
initially manually selected to install the open file module (among others)
when we installed the client on a WinXP machine. I received the same
errors you listed. After much trial and error, we had ran the setup
again, chose
I ran into this exact problem when I had one 1GB random access DISK based
primary storage pool (about 27% used). I didn't backup it up to it's own
copy storage pool, but I did back it up to the same copy storage pool
where I copied the other management classes. When reclamation occurred, I
would
I could swear I read somewhere that TSM v5 added a feature to client
schedules that allowed for Pre- and Post-schedule commands. I can't
remember where I read that, nor can I find the information about it in the
version we have installed now (just upgraded from 4.2.1.7 to 5.1.7.1).
Does v5 allow t
I have a script that cancels any migration, reclamation, move, and backup
stgpool processes. I modified it slightly here, but it should work to
cancel any process running in TSM. However, remember that the process will
not necessarily cancel immediately. It has to finish what it is doing at
that
John,
Correct assumption.. No new management classes created. No management
classes are set to absolute. This node didn't change management classes,
nor had anyone modified it's Node definition or dsm.opt files.
As far as things that require a backup, we can find no evidence of anything
changing
Server is AIX 4.3.3 running TSM 4.2.1.7
Prior to this weekend, everything seemed to be fine on this Netware 4.11
server running B/A Client 4.1.3.0. Compression is set to ON at the Node
Definition level. It was inspecting its 111K+ files and backing up between
200-1000 files a day (about 60-200MB
ge eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
Todd Lundstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/18/2003 09:53
Please
id.
If this is your situation, then great!
I'm assuming that most people today only use DIRMC to avoid binding to a
management class that has NOLIMIT for object retonly.
Does anyone else out there use DIRMC?
Todd Lundstedt wrote:
>I have recently setup a Directory Management Class, some s
I have recently setup a Directory Management Class, some server-side Client
Option Sets pointing DIRMC to that management class, and assigned those
option sets to nodes. So now, all new/changed directories should be being
managed by that management class (disk based storage, no migration, etc.).
I
efaults except put in the the new
nodename and password.
7) Click FINISH.
8) restart the scheduler service
Bottom line is that the service installation saves stuff in the registry
and
you have to fix it this way.
If this doesn't fix it, I would try using the setup wizard to uninstall the
old service
TSM server 4.2.1.7 running on AIX 4.3.3
TSM Client 5.1.5.0 running on Netware 5
Start a Backup Archive GUI session from the Client Node list (click on the
Link to Node icon).
The Java GUI loads (if this is the first time accessing a 5.x client from
that workstation, the Java install runs without i
AIX 4.3.3 running TSM Server 4.2.1.7.
I have a few client nodes that are W2K servers. Oddly, they are named
after our NT servers (NT-ServerA, NT-ServerB, etc..). The dsm.opt file
contains the NT machine name as the NodeName. I would like to change the
NodeName to W2K-ServerA, but not rename the
this? (probably should have asked that
question first.)
<:+)
Thanks in advance.
Todd Lundstedt
Technical Specialist
Via Christi Information Management Services
ofc. (316) 261-8385
fax. (316) 660-0036
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For you folks that patch your TSM server frequently (like the individual
from Oxford University who upgraded from some version to 5.1.6.0 on Feb3,
then to 5.1.6.1 on Feb7, and now planning to upgrade to 5.1.6.2 within a
couple weeks), how many of you have Storage Agent nodes?
I am still on 4.2.1.7
I am not certain on the order in which filespaces are processed during
expiration, but, from looking at the log of my expiration processing, it
appears to go in node (or perhaps filespace) order, based on when they were
added to TSM (certainly not alphabetical). Oldest node (or filespace) gets
pro
Or, just back it up to diskpool. When the diskpool gets to the high water
mark, it will start migration to the next storage pool (I assume, your
tapepool). When the diskpool gets completely full, TSM will automatically
send files to the next storage pool (again, assuming your tapepool),
meaning,
may not be fully
formatted. There was a version of the shark code that said that everything
was formatted yet it wasn't. The only way you could tell was to go into
the
shark under where you configure paths and refresh the screen.
good luck and let me know if I can be of further assistance
Becky
wo entries for "hdisk2" and two for "hdisk3". Smitty won't let me
remove them (not enough information to uniquely identify the device) and
similar error messages for "change/show charactaristics".
How can I remove "hdisk2" and "hdisk3"? The 10-
I am trying to see if I am on the right track here. I don't have a test
Netware server to play with. Please let me know if I am thinking
correctly, or if I am way off base. Thanks
I have recently been told that we need to backup certain files on a machine
weekly, and the rest of the files on th
How strange.. I just went through something similar. Running on AIX 4.3.3,
TSM 4.2.1.7. What are you running?
The short answer was to reboot the AIX operating system, and everything
started working fine.. The long answer follows (well, not really an answer,
just my situation, and what I tried to
I believe exclude.dir is processed first regardless of where it is stacked
in the list.
You will have to work your exclude.dir statements so there isn't one that
will hit true on the "u38" directory;
exclude.dir /u[0-2,4-9][0-9]
exclude.dir /u3[0-7,9]
Hope this helps.
"Peppe
I think that may be because all of the functionality at Tivoli.com has been
(or soon will be completely) replaced with functionality at IBM.com. I
received several emails over the last month regarding this last week, and I
think Friday, Oct. 18 was officially the last day we were to try to use
Tiv
Correct me if I am wrong, but this will only change the management class
for the backups after the changes are made. All of the other systemobjects
that exist in the database that are managed by the old management class
will be retained for their 60 days. In order to facilitate the move to the
ne
Not true on my library, Ken...
I have run several audits using checklabel=barcode before with success.
The arm has never moved in the library with an audit using checkl=b.
|+>
|| KEN HORACEK |
|| |
|| Sent b
The reason I started the audit was because TSM was not reporting the tape
in the library, yet the library knew the tape was inserted. I could see
the tape in the library (with my own eyes). Using the manual operations |
move tape functions from the LCD display on the library, the library was
able
When dealing with multiple primary storage pools being copied to a single
copy storage pool, it might be better to use "move data". And yes, you can
move data from a copy storage pool volume as long as it is set to
access=offsite (unavailable works, too, I think).
move data will work
OR
delete v
I am interested in reading your write-up. Is it complete, and if so, under
what subject? If not, do you have an estimate on when?
Thanks for doing this Gretchen,
Todd
|+>
|| "Gretchen L. |
|| Thiele" |
||
I have seen the number of reclaimable tapes grow steadily over the course
of a week, but the percent utilized average would go down over time.
If I remember correctly, reclaiming tapes in offsite pools is similar to a
migration, in that the reclamation process moves the data in the largest
"chunks
it".
If
set to no, then tsm will rebackup the file when netware compresses or
decompresses the file.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 2, 2002 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backups of a file when it hasn't changed.
I h
After the backup of our database, we backup the device config and volhist
files from TSM to the text files, then we perform a maksysb on our AIX
server. That backup tape (4mm) goes offsite with the TSM tapes (LTO).
|+->
|| Rob Schroeder |
|
ubject: Re: Backups of a file when it hasn't changed.
|
>|
Check that your copy group "copy mode" is not set to absolute.
Is this windows? Are file permissio
---|
Did the permissions change on the file or owner or group? If any of these
change, TSM will take a new copy of the file as if the file had changed.
--
Phillip Ford
Senior Software Specialist
Corporate Computer Center
Schering-Plough Corp.
(901) 320-4462
Does anyone else see this issue?
I have seen several instances where TSM backed up a file when it had not
been modified in anyway. Even when you look at the restore application,
there are several versions of a file, each with the same create date, the
same modified date, and different backed up d
Environment
Server: TSM 4.2.1.7, AIX 4.3.3, two fiber gigabit ethernet cards, each
accessing disk and tape (I know, this is bad, but it shouldn't impact this
situation)
Client: W2K, 4 processors (around 900mhz, I think), just over 3GB of
physical memory, TSM B/A client 4.2.1.32, TSPSQL 2.2, Storag
rver that the file (the TDP backups are all date/time
stamped and therefore UNIQUE) has been deleted. Then your deleted file
policy in the copygroup is in effect.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
matically lengthening expiration process run times
are a true sign that a TSM server is out of gas, and needs an upgrade
just for its present workload, not to mention adding more work to it.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Todd Lunds
Well, well.. I totally read my book the wrong way. I will go recalculate.
Thanks for pointing out this huge error on my part. Now I have to go
figure out where the rest of my database utilization is going, too.
|+>
|| "Thomas Denier" |
|
other way to do this without increasing the size of my
database more than the size of the files being backed up (what is that... 3
million times more?)?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Todd Lundstedt
Technical Specialist
Via Christi Information Management Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ons of those files. They
stay
on whatever media they were on originally.Nothing triggers them to move
or relocate. They aren't hurt, you can still restore from them if you need
to. The best thing to do is just leave them where they sit, and let them
expire when they normally would.
vance for your help.
Todd Lundstedt
Technical Specialist
Via Christi Information Management Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ps FYI. Since the first time I sent this note out, I have done some
testing. After working with TSM support on an issue that came up in my
testing, I find out that a management
... a list of files (with directory names) in a storage pool that only have
one version?
Or can you do that with an SQL select?
I am trying to identify files with unique names that may be of a temporary
nature, so I can point them to a different management class with a Retain
Only Version count
point to the new management class? If so,
what happens to the files in the current storage pool and the current
management class?
Is there another way to do this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Todd Lundstedt
Technical Specialist
Via Christi Information Management Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am starting to play with the "stripe" function of the TDP for SQL. I got
to wondering...
If you have a database backed up directly to tape using 4 stripes... you
need 4 tape drives to do that.. and, 4 tape drives to do a restore. I got
that much...
But..
What happens if, by reclamation proces
If you are doing this from the command line in AIX.
dsmadmc -id= -password= "select whatever from whereever,
etc" | tail +XX | grep -v YY > new_filename
If you are doing this to a file that was created from the dsmadmc client
already.. it is very similar...
cat | tail +XX | grep -v YY > new_
Wow! Steve, that sounds like.. um.. fun?!
I follow along with what you are trying to do, but I am not sure what this
would do to the application, since that application watches this directory
(as, I am guessing, a sort of queue). I would hesitate to create any file
on my own in this directory, ev
Nope.. sorry .. I didn't include any specific info..
TSM Server 4.2.1.7 running on AIX 433
the node in question is Netware 4.11 running TSM B/A Client for Netware
4.1.3.0.
It is an application and fileserver, so no, there is a LOT more stuff on
this filespace than just the files I want to expire o
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
