APAR= IC28653 SER=IN INCORROUT
QUERY EVENT STATUS INCORRECT COMPLETED FAILED
STAT= CLOSED PER FESN0907344- CTID= SJ0291 ISEV= 2
SB00/11/07 RC00/11/08 CL00/11/23 PD SEV= 2
PE= TYPE= F
RCOMP= 5698TSMCLT
csrss.exe comes back as a Microsoft copywrited executable. Therefore it is
part of the NT OS. Its discription field reads "Client Server Runtime
Services" so I can only imagin it is part of the networking subsystem.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
- Original Message -
Fr
Yes this is correct. 4.1 and 3.7 supported digital unix at thoughs levels.
In addition 4.1 now supports 5.0 and up.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 20
Looks like it was time for a reboot then... After all it is only Windows
NT.
Keith Davey
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Zeke Crater wrote:
> My SQL Server v6.5 (running on an NT v4.0 server) backups were running well
> for months, then one day I started getting ACO4210E -- Failed to connect to
What is the percise error message you get when you try to delete volume
discard=yes ?
Keith Davey
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Palmadesso Jack wrote:
> Kind of quiet today!
>
> I hope this is a simple one. I have some volumes that were removed from a
> 3590 library and then went "
Now I am not positive on this, but I beleve TSM client prohibits the
system state files from being restored to a new node name. Probably just
want to rename the node name of the destination server to be the same as
the original node name and then do the restore normaly.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 2
APAR= IC29221 SER=AB ABEND
GPFS ACL TSM CLIENT ABEND ON RESTORE
STAT= OPEN FESN0907344- CTID= SJ0291 ISEV= 2
SB01/01/02 RC01/01/02 CL PD SEV= 2
PE= TYPE= F
RCOMP= 5698TSMCLTIVOLI STR MGR
offten times $DATE is set in the environmental verables.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Michel Engels wrote:
> Hi TSMers,
>
>
> Does anybody know a way to pass the current date to a script?
>
>
>
> Michel
>
>
>
>
>
> Have a Happy ending of 2000 and a great beginning of 2001
>
Good Day,
No prior data stored on the storage pool will be effected. Only data sent
from that point in time onward. In theory, eventualy the old data will
expire off, and the old non-colocated tapes willbe reclaimed.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Shekhar Dhotre wrote
Yes TSM fully supports, and will make good use of muti-cpu environments.
I think TSM runs better on AIX, but then I am a bit byast
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Marco Supino wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was looking at the Doc. of the TSM 4.1, and couldn't find whether
Contact TSM s/390 support. They will provide you with the FTP site, and
password needed to get the updates.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Tim Brown wrote:
> the tivoli web site states that tivoli for os390 version 4 is at release
> 4.1.1, i am at 4.1.0
> how does one get 4.1.
OpenVMS is an OS writen by DEC for its Alpha processors. By an for the
most part it is a dead OS.
OS/390 also called MVS is a mainframe OS that runs on IBM System/390
I am not certain what you mean by tier1-3
Keith Davey
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Jacques Butcher wrote:
> I Just want to get s
IBM's 3494,
then the tapes are broken into logical libraries (classes/catagories), and
each application only sees the tapes in its logical class.
Keith Davey
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Walker, Lesley R wrote:
> Does anyone have experience of using an ACSLS-controlled STK library and
> shari
; and the HTTPPort on a success.
>
> Keith Davey wrote:
> >
> > Check 'query option' and insure that the http port option is set to 1580.
> > If not go the the dsmserv.opt file and set the http port back to 1580 and
> > restart the server. If you bring it up in
hypothisis, and I could be completly mistaken.
Keith Davey
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, sekar n wrote:
> Hi KD ,
> thanks. It now looks that the maximum file size which
> tsm can could handle would be limited only by the
> individual volume size! . I believe it could be
> endlessly i
transfer, then that
agragate is expired, and a new tape is mounted. AKA an Agragate can not
be split between two volumes.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, sekar n wrote:
> Hi all,
> Iam aware of some limitations on AIX/solaris for
> individual filesize > 2 GB. Wh
restore operations, and thus skiped.
Keith Davey
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Louis Wiesemann wrote:
> Is there a way to exclude files when restoring? All of the documentation describes
>excluding on backups, but I could find nothing about excluding on restores. We're
>trying to re
ations now
lissening on 1580 for inbound connections.
Keith Davey
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) wrote:
> Hi *SM-ers,
>
> I had to restart my 3.7.2 TSM server (running on a 3466 (NSM) with AIX
> 4.3.2).
> Now I can no longer use the web admin - I always get "server or DN
I can not speek to your second problem. However for the first: Did you
delete and redefine all of your devices after the upgrade. I am certain
that this is a requiorment, and is mentioned in the 4.1.0 README file.
Keith Davey
ps. Also look to your Atape levels and make sure they are current
is not being blocked, I would expect to see an access
denied message in the broser.
Keith Davey
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, DIEGO GARCIA _ DIRECCION DE SISTEMAS-. wrote:
> May be you must use your server ip such as 10.0.9.89:1580
>
> first with ping 10.0.9.89:1580
> later http://10.0.9.89:1
of actual tape length per cartrage, and
compression rate. It will fluxuate based on the type of data you are
backuing up or archiving.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Kelly J. Lipp wrote:
> If you set the estimated capacity at some number, will it fill the tape
> beyond that capacity?
ggs in
one basket". It really is up to you to deturman when it is best to split
the load between more than one TSM server.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Roger Dick wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm running TSM 3.1.2.22. Will be upgrading to 3.7 soon. The question
> is.
> Our TSM
RFC's state that there is plans to include this library in a future
release of the product. I do no know what release at this time.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Andreas Rensch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there anybody out there who has experiences with an exabyte 110L
> auto
You can find it at :
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/AIX/
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Diana Noble wrote:
> I'm about to upgrade to TSM 4.1. Some of the recommendations were to make
> sure atape and atldd are at the correct level, although I don't see the
> level specified in the doc a
I am contacting someone localy to see if I can get you an answer. Will
update you as soon as I get any word.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Andreas Rensch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there anybody out there who has experiences with an exabyte 110L
> autoloader (LTO) with an tsm serv
Off the top of my head I know that there were problems id'ed in the 3.7.0
client schedual process. Yo may want to upgrade to the lattest client
version.
Keith Davey
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, sekar n wrote:
> Any help on the above problem is solicited.
>
> Operating environment of
I am sory to correct you, but there is a field in the nodes table that
stores the hex IP address of the client.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Williams, Tim wrote:
> I don't think that it really 'stores' that information, per se.
> IT, is however logge
It is stored in the Nodes table in the TSM server Database
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, David Longo wrote:
> When you register a node name and the node first contacts the *SM Server, the server
>stores the IP address of the client. Where is this IP address stored on the server?
>
>
> David B. Longo
>
when the tapes go into use and reach full status there capacity will be
updated.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Eliza Lau wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We just upgraded all the 3590B1A drives in the 3494 to 3590E1A with the
> option to support the Extended Length 3590-K tapes.
> I did the following to redefine the
Using a new node name, run monthly selective backups of your server.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Forgosh, Seth wrote:
> Due to a failed server and the length of time required to restore it, my
> management has "requested" that we implement monthly full backups of all
> "critical" servers. How would I g
They will return to scratch as soon as the pending delay they were set
under expires. After that they will not go into pending state again.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Kathleen M Hallahan wrote:
> When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is
> subseq
This is a known isssue, and has been corrected at the latest levels of 3.7
and 4.1
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Short, Anne wrote:
> I am running TSM 4.1.1 on W2K with an Exabyte 440 library with Mammoth
> drives. I have noticed that when a write operation reaches the end of the
In what manner have you defined the library to TSM. ACSLS?
Keith davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Giuseppe Taccone wrote:
> Subject: storagetek stk9740 (drive 9840) with TSM 4.1 on AIX 4.3.3
>
>
> Is there anybody that have already use the library stk9740 storagetek with TSM 4.1
&g
4.1.2 Client has been released for most platforms.
Keith Davey
You should contact IBM/Tivoli Support. A Level 2 tech can assist you in
removing the values from the DB
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a customer with a disk storage pool volume that
> won't delete. It is a raw logical volume and
know,
most likly they will open an APAR aganst it.
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Richard Sims wrote:
> >We have a desire to move the scheduling of some of our TSM backups out of
> >the TSM scheduler, and instead launch them via a scheduling package (Tivoli
> >Maestro). I
End of Service for 3.7 is 1.01.03
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Williams, Tim wrote:
> shame on Tivoli if this was truly not in any readme as a WARNING
>
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Corning-Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 12/15/2000 08:11 AM
>
Try clean Archdir
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Hanna Hahne wrote:
> Since we upgraded our Server from ADSM 3.1.2.55 to TSM 3.7.4
> we experience bad archive performance. Compared to the previous
> server it takes 10 times as long to archive a file and it is not
> network or
Well I am not to sure about what volume contains a file, but if you want
to see what files are in a volume then q content works
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Francisco Molero wrote:
> Hi,
> Would I like to know how I can know in which volume is
> a file ? Is it possible ?
>
e is 3494a, enter that name on the worksheet in the
Device Name field for the library.
---
I do not beleve there is a /dev/lmcp0 in sun. The communications are
facilitated via the daemon process.
Hope this is helpfull
Keith Davey
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Mubashir Farooqi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
I have not seen any troublsome problems in the upgrade. Like any major
move, be sure to run apropreate DB backups prior to the upgrade.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Wolfgang Herkenrath wrote:
> Hi *SM'ers,
>
> time is running to fast. The year will end in a few days and the support for my ADSM
>too.
Is your storage pool colocated?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Francisco Molero wrote:
> Hi collegues,
>
> We have a 3575 library with 4 drives. My problem is we
> have many volumes in filling status. I tried to do a
> "move data" from the filling tapes to disk stg pool
> and after that, to do a migrati
writen goes out. The tape is ejected, and generates this error. A new
tape is mounted and the operation continues normaly. If this is what you
are seeing, then the error is being generated erroniusly. I beleve this
problem is fixed in 3.7.4 and 4.1.1. Like I said I will have to conferm
that.
Keith
universal exclude option will be made available.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Rushforth, Tim wrote:
> Thanks Keith:
>
> The manual I was looking at was for windows which doesn't mention anything
> about HSM of course so basically it had the same description for all
a group of files from normal backup
services, but not from HSM.
exclude.file.backup:
Excludes a file from normal backup services.
Hope this is helpfull.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
> Thanks,
>
> Tim Rushforth
> City of Winnipeg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
Good Day Sir,
There has never been support for Informix on HPUX. However announcment
299-281 on IBMLink states that there is intent to release a 64 bit TDP for
Informix on HPUX in a forthcomming release. Unfortunatly I can not be
specific on what release that will be in.
Keith Davey
Tivoli
I am having one of our project managers look into this. Will send a reply
as soon as I have more information.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Talafous, John G. wrote:
> What happened to support for TDP for Informix on HP-UX??? Looking at the
> Tivoli site, I find that
expired or reclaimed off the tape. Thus they would normaly have been
returned to scratch.
Hope this is helpfull
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Peter Koblauch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some DLT tapes in a cabinet but I'm not sure what these contain.
>
> The tapes
it into a production environment. Just to be sure that no problems
creep up in your unique environment.
Keith Davey
Tivoli Systems
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Richard Sims wrote:
> >Our Financial Systems production includes archiving all file transfers from
> >the mainframe on *SM, 115,
- Original Message -
From: "Raul Giraldo Suarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 8:29 AM
Subject: Migration from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 4.1
> Hi everybody. I have some questions for you, please be patient.
>
> 1) We are running ADSM 3.1 on AIX 4.3.2
The short answer is to get another TSM server. TSM is incredably
flexable, but it does have its limits. I would strongly consider spliting
the load across two or more servers.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Vijay Havaralu wrote:
> Hello every one,
> We are running tsm-server ver 3.7
I have seeing the beta 3.1 linux client succesfully run backup and restore
operations on NetBSD box. However the 3.7 and 4.1 clients will not
execute in that environment.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Carl Makin wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Brian Heiling wrote:
>
> > Has anyone seen a Free
output to
a text file.
Keith Davey
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, TSM Mail-ID wrote:
> Hi,
> Using the TSM B/A 3.7.2.x client GUI, is there a log
> file that gets generated that tracks what is actually
> restored?
> We are trying to do some disaster recovery of some NT
> 4.0 servers.
>
53 matches
Mail list logo
