I will be out of the office starting 26.09.2003 and will not return until
14.10.2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
+-+
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or au
With the option wait=yes the reply should not be necessary
|+->
|| "Ford,|
|| Phillip" |
|| |
|| Sent by: |
|| "ADSM: Dist |
|| Stor
I will be out of the office starting 18.06.2003 and will not return until
23.06.2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
+-+
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or au
I will be out of the office starting 05.03.2003 and will not return until
10.03.2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
+-+
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or au
Hi Steve,
this sounds pretty much like a DB corruption, but I would be very hesitant
to run the auditdb command without verification by TSM support. It might be
dangerous and it can take a lot of time if you run it without specification
of a special area. With an 11 GB DB it took about 36 hours,
On Thursday 05 April 2001 19:11, you wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I just received my TSM 4.1 upgrade CDs. So I'm faced with the fun of
> upgrading to 4.1 on my AIX system. I would love to see your document on
> the steps to do this properly.
>
> Thanks, Jim
>
I did the upgrade from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 4.
On Monday 19 March 2001 19:56, you wrote:
> >03/19/01 17:24:46 ANRD asvol.c(2847): Volume 0BA40C cannot be deleted
> > to SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references.
We had that problem as well, and the only way to get rid of it, was to run an
audit DB (must be at least ADSM 3.1.2.90). There
We had the same problem, and the solution was:
TSA500 requires IPX to authenticate to the filesystem on the console.
You will have the same effect with scrsaver.nlm. Trying to unlock, it will
check your rights to the server object, which will fail without IPX.
Regards,
Jörg
On Wednesday 14
r can we leave the "Notes
> Agent" on the Notes servers for a while so we can test our implementation
> of TDP/Notes and TDP/Domino in our lab, connecting to the production TSM
> server?
TDP for Domino requires the new funtionality Transaction Logging of Notes 5
aka Domino. AK
ht be
sent direcly to tape bypassing the disk. This will occupy a tape drive with
appearing in the process list. Unfortunately, I do not know any method to
determine, is a session is currently using a tape drive.
Regards,
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
file/directory ).
>
> Why does TSM ask for overwriting on a complete new and empty volume ?
>
> For any explanations I thank you
>
> Christoph
Hi Christoph,
just a guess, do you have the same name space applied to the new volume?
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
;q actlog" gets this info from
somewhere else?
Thanks,
Jörg
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
rface for PERL using dsmadmc, but I
think, gathering information from a DB into a report, and parsing the report
to get the field content is not the best way to do it.
Any hint to help me to go in the right direction is very much appreciated.
Kind regards,
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADS
achieve this on your own? Write a
script that collects a list of all tapes assigned to the dedicated stgpool
and preform a loop with the command on that list.
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
does not meet the SCSI specifications and
therefore reports an "undetermined error".
It might be, that there was a short communication problem on the SCSI bus,
however, I would contact the technical support of the vendor to get
clarification.
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
--
>
> Del Hoobler
> IBM Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Joerg Nouvertne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 02/06/2001
> 08:55:23 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[E
%. Does anybody know the order of precedence for
> pre-emption?
>
> Can anybody confirm or add to me conclusions. Thanks for your time.
>
> Neil Sharp
> Merrill Lynch ADSM/TSM Administrator
> Work : 020-7573-0469
> Mobile : 07769-741612
> Pager : 01893-038277
> e-mail
know that RedHat 7.0 has a
special version of the glibc and gcc installed, which is not binary
compatible to non-RedHat binaries. Is this client compiled for RedHat 7.0?
[cut off librarylist]
> So I thought the asked libary is already there.
>
> Michael Jung
Kind regards,
--
Joerg Nouvertn
ot;
returns the same error, I cannot run an "audit vol" on it.
Any ideas? Many thanks in advanced.
--
Joerg Nouvertne
... who still runs ADSM 3.1, but who will take the new adventure TSM 4.1 soon.
On Tuesday 06 February 2001 16:22, you wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We've got a Netware 5.1 server that's been a real problem child. The
> Netware Admin is curious if anyone is aware of problems with ADSM and
> version 7.44 of the Netware DS. This is evidently an older version of DS
> and he wants some
Hello all,
recently I've upgraded our TDP for Domino on NT to Version 1.1.1 including
Testfix. As a result, the message numbers have changed from ANR4991 to
ACDxxx, which works fine accept ACD5211, which is the statistic after backing
up the archive logs; the statistics are missing and they ar
On Monday 15 January 2001 20:45, you wrote:
> If you are getting compressed log records then the utilization of your
> recovery log is not caused
> by missing data base backups. Data base backups are only needed to release
> log space when
> the log is in rollforward mode and log compression only
On Wednesday 17 January 2001 11:29, you wrote:
> Hello. I'm running ADSM Server on Unix Server and backing up NT server with
> ADSM Client 3.7.2.16. In the NT server we need to install one service
> named "ADSM Scheduler" .
>
> The problem is that the service "ADSM Scheduler " don't run and it gi
pool?
A file migrated from tape is the same file in the primary storage pool, and
therfore it will not be copied again if a copy already exists.
> What happens in case of
> disaster requiring a restore storage operation? At this point, I really
> don't know what to expect
>
> All
On Tuesday 16 January 2001 09:00, you wrote:
> Hy everyone,
>
> we are discussing the possibilities of archiving data with TSM or other
> products (from NT,UNIX).
> Our requirements are to archive data for about 30 years. TSM is in
Hi all,
due to missing DB backups, our recovery log exeeded 95%. As a result, some
records of the log got compressed, which prevent a DB backup to occur. The
process stops with the following error:
ANR2362E command: DATABASE BACKUP IS NOT CURRENTLY POSSIBLE - COMPRESSED LOG
RECORDS EXIST IN THE
26 matches
Mail list logo
