On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:39:51PM +0200, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
>
> Solve, no. Get around, yes.
AFAIK this is fixed in the v5.3 client. We're setting LANG and LC_ALL
to en_US, and as far as I can tell, files with both UTF8 and iso8851-1
characters in their names are backed up now.
LANG=en_US
LC_A
Sorry, no TSM/debian experience, but I'm in the same position, trying
to move from Solaris to Red Hat EL4. The IBMTape-drivers are available
from ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Linux/, but not for
RHEL4 or debian. I have a support request in at IBM asking for
IBMTape-drivers for RHEL-4
Hi fellow tsm'ers..
We have a linux file server that automounts filesystems via NFS. If
there is a symbolic link from one of the local filesystems to a
automount-filesystem, this automount filesystem seems to get mounted
when 'dsmc' is doing its daily backup. 'dsmc' seems to be following
the symbo
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:13:25AM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
>
> Is anyone employing any kind of electronic transmission or
> electronic vaulting to do away with the archaic trucking model?
We've just set up an arrangement with another TSM-site at our
university (totally different department, but
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:09:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kus wrote:
>
> I've played with HSM+NFS and there was no problems with mounting at all.
> Copying files to HSM file system from nfs-client works perfectly, but
> copying from HSM-NFS file system to nfs-client migrated files gives me
> stub files.
I just set up our two new LTO2-drives in an 3584-expantion frame. We
previously had the base-frame and four LTO1 drives. What I did was:
o connect hardware
o run cfgmgr
o define drives (DEFINE DRIVE 3584LTO TAPE4)
o define paths (DEFINE PATH TSM TAPE4 SRCTYPE=SERVE
I have master:/export/filesystem NFS exported to several client nodes
who all NFS mount it as master:/net/filesystem/. And I would want to let
the users archive and retrieve files in this filesystem on any of the
client nodes.
i.e. the users wants to be able to execute:
dsmc archive /net/
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:37:17AM -0500, Bill Boyer wrote:
> Got this from a co-worker...
>
> The LTO2 version of the 3584 has been announced - Planned Availability Date
> is Valentine's Day:
>
> http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_103-004
We're in the process of buying another fra
>
> We run HSM on a 53 SP node, 3 attached S7A(s) and 2 S80(s), 2 6H1(s)
> environment with GPFS .. + HACMP...
The special thing about our configuration is that we run GPFS with
HACMP instead of GPFS with PSSP. The installation scripts for the HSM
client for GPFS expects some PSSP tools (and ma
We had planned to run HSM on our GPFS/SSA/HACMP cluster of 3 p690s, and
suddenly IBM discovered that HSM is only supported on SP-nodes.
We tried installing it, but the installation scripts bombed out
because it couldn't find some SP tools. I'm suspecting that it's only
a matter of getting the sof
10 matches
Mail list logo
