Server Installation Date/Time: 08/22/410 B.C. 00:10:05
Server Restart Date/Time: 07/10/2005 08:52:00
YES, that's right 410 B.C. We were one of the early beta sites for what
was then call "UGH". It was very popular in all of the cave data centers
where backup and recovery of mission critical d
TSM Server AIX 5.2.4.0 / AIX 5.3
TSM B/A Client for Windows 5.2.2
Windows Server 2003 v 5.02
I am receiving the following error trying to restore SYSTEMSTATE. I get
same error from GUI and cmd line. Any suggestions would be appreciated...
tsm> q systemstate
Size Backup Date
Mark,
I agree with you that TSM can be used, but I am not sure I am
clear on the '3' ways you are referring to. Would you take a moment and
describe briefly the '3' ways...Thanks in advance.
Dave
"Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
07/20/200
You could try cd'ing to the baclient dir and then try the dsmc. and/or
reset your env vars from the uninstall..
Dave
Mike Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
07/12/2005 03:44 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.
Hi LIst,
TSM Server 5.2.4 on AIX 5.3
TSM Client 5.2.0 on AIX 5.2
TSM STA 5.2.4 on AIX 5.2
Just wondering if any other LAN Free users out there have periodic
problems withe there LAN Free backup not working. Backup still works over
IP, but obviously I would prefer
can rely STRICTLY on permission inheritance for ALL
subdirectories from the root, you gotta back the permissions up.
Go have that gin and tonic
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Nicholson
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 5:05 PM
To
ot;ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: *URGENT*Windows OS Auditing
On May 19, 2005, at 5:05 PM, David Nicholson wrote:
> ...The Intel folks tell me they
> recently turned on "O/S level Auditing" of the DATA
Hi List,
I am seeing a tremendous and sudden increase in the amount of data
I am backing up from my Intel servers. The Intel folks tell me they
recently turned on "O/S level Auditing" of the DATA drive on almost all of
the Windows servers. I am wondering if this has resulted in TSM perceiv
the damaged tape to the replacement, and retire the cripple.
Richard Sims
On Apr 29, 2005, at 6:39 AM, David Nicholson wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a 3590J with a damaged internal label. The 3494 library
> ejects that cartridge when I try to use it. The cartridge has
&g
Hi List,
I have a 3590J with a damaged internal label. The 3494 library
ejects that cartridge when I try to use it. The cartridge has obviously
been abused (the case is cracked), but I would like to get the data off of
it without having to bring all of my copypool volumes back from the v
d. Check your Devclass MOUNTLimit as the most common
cause, plus your Activity Log for accompanying messages.
Richard Sims
On Apr 5, 2005, at 7:23 AM, David Nicholson wrote:
> All,
>
> TSM Server 5.2.4.0 (AIX 5.3)
> 3494 library w/ (15) 3590E
>
> Suddenly (I think) I
TSM 5.2.4
AIX 5.3 p520
ESS disk for db
JFS2 filesystem
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08471600
EXPIRATION 20
ns we
have experienced. Check your Devclass MOUNTLimit as the most common
cause, plus your Activity Log for accompanying messages.
Richard Sims
On Apr 5, 2005, at 7:23 AM, David Nicholson wrote:
> All,
>
> TSM Server 5.2.4.0 (AIX 5.3)
> 3494 library w/ (15) 3590E
>
> Su
All,
TSM Server 5.2.4.0 (AIX 5.3)
3494 library w/ (15) 3590E
Suddenly (I think) I am getting a LOT of ANR8447E messages. A "q
mount" shows several drives in an "idle" state. My mount retention is set
to '3'. I thought that the mount retention would be preempted if there
was a need to
As it relates to Tivoli Storage Manager SAN Tape Library Sharing.
Can anyone tell me if a TSM Server 5.3.0.0 as a library manager is
compatible with a TSM Server 5.2.2.0 as a library client? They are
sharing a 3494.
I would like to avoid upgrading both of my TSM servers at the same time if
p
Can anybody give me a URL to get the 5.2.2 LAN free storage agent for AIX.
I thought the 5.2 storage agent would workit isn't.
Thanks in advance.
Dave
What a great time for this post/question!!! Thanks for asking it!!
(2) TSM servers, 2 tape Libraries (3494 w/ 15 3590's drives / 2500 cells
and a 3584 w/ 6 LTO II drives / 250 cells)
800 nodes (AIX, Windows, Linux) Every flavor of DB or app you can imagine.
We backup 2-3TB a day.
Total stored in
I have (2) TSM servers on AIX (H50 and H70) with 2GB FC adapter. I have
(15) 3590 and 6 (3580) tape drives hanging off a single adapter from each
server. I'm sure in a lab somewhere that my single adapter could be shown
to be a bottleneck when trying to stream data to all those
drives...however in
Hi List,
I am building a new TSM server to consolidate my 2 existing
servers.
The 2 existing servers are Pseries H50 and H70; AIX 5.1; TSM 5.2;
SSA disk and FC attached 3590 tape drives. Each server has a 40GB TSM
database; about 100 GB of diskpool's and they backup roughly 1TB
amp; Drift
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen 6B
183 62 TÄBY
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-10-08 15:47
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Hi David!
Try the following SQL statement:
SELECT CAST((100 - (CAST(MAX_REDUCTION_MB AS FLOAT) * 256 ) /
(CAST(USABLE_PAGES AS FLOAT) - CAST(USED_PAGES AS FLOAT) ) * 100) AS
DECIMAL(4,2)) AS PERCENT_FRAG FROM DB
It will give you the fragmentation level.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM
Hi All,
I am surprised by the significant reduction is Pct Utilized. I
thought in previous discussions that Unload/Reload had minimal impact on
utilization. I have (2) TSM 5.2.2 servers on AIX with 40GB db's that are
90% used. I haven't done a unload/reload since there creation 3 years
10:44 PM
>Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
>Subject:Re: Hey Big BlueWhy not MOVE DATA across copy
pools?!?
>
>
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>B
r Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Hey Big BlueWhy not MOVE DATA across copy pools?!?
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Nicholson
>I tried a MOVE DATA for offsite data...it did not go after the
Tim,
I tried a MOVE DATA for offsite data...it did not go after the
data in the primary pool...it wanted to mount the volume in the copy
pool...which was offsite.
Am I missing something?
Dave Nicholson
Whirlpool Corporation
"Rushforth, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM:
As luck would have it, the nodes I moved were large file servers and my
copy pool is not collocated. I probably have data spread across 600
volumes. I think I'll pass on bringing them back
This is by no means a "new" frustration for many folks. Any idea why old
big blue hasn't tried to add th
ne way to delete
this data. (This assumes that there is still domr data that you want on
Copy Pool #1)
-Original Message-
From: David Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 7, 2004 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Primary Pool and Copypool Relationship
Hi All,
I
Hi All,
I moved a lot of data out of Primary Pool #1 and into Primary Pool # 2.
Primary Pool #1 used Copy Pool #1 and Primary Pool # 2 used Copy Pool #2.
It appears that the Copy Pool # 1 still has the backup of this data...which I
expected. The problem is that
it appears the
"Imperfect Collocation"??? My experience has been that when I reach the
maxscratch threshold the storage group is full and cant accept data. Am I
missing something??
Dave Nicholson
Whirlpool Corporation
Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: MOVE DRM for 3584 LTO library
Enter the command: Q DRMSTATUS
If CHECKLABEL is set to YES, TSM will try to verify the label before
ejecting the tape.
To change, enter command:
set drmchecklabel no
-Original Message
Hi,
I have a 3494 and a 3584 tape library. When I do MOVE DRM
the 3584 tries to check the label on the tape before ejecting it. My 3494
does not do this. Does anybody know how to prevent the 3584 LTO library
from checking the label when a MOVE DRM occurs?? I do not always have tap
Hi List,
I have a 700GB Oracle DB to backup every day. It's a 4.3 AIX
box...s LAN Free not an option for my TSM 5.2.2 server. I have
dedicated GB nic's on both the TSM client and TSM server. The network
between them is not over utilized. I am backing up directly to FC LTO II
drives. C
We do not plan on expanding our 3494/3590E/3590J environment in the
future. We purchased a 3584 last year and I am beginning to shift workload
to LTO. I have no plans for a full scale "conversion" to LTO.
Dave Nicholson
Whirlpool Corporation
Hi All,
Have a situation where a virus has deleted several files from our
Novell file servers. I want to restore to last nights backups, but I do
not want to regress changes that have been made to files that are still on
the file servers. The short of it is I only want to restore files th
Hi John,
I can't give you specific TSM mod 27 experience, but we use
mod27's heavily on our 800 for DB2 and it screams. No performance
problems, but you should know we are using dynamic PAV's. I would have no
hesitation using mod27's for about anything.
Dave Nicholson
John Naylor
Hi,
I have 2 TSM 5.2.2 AIX servers sharing a 3494. I have 10 tapes
that appear to be orphaned. The combined volhist on the TSM library
manager says they belong to the library client. When I look in the volhist
on the library client they do not exist. Any ideas how I can clean this
up?
Th
TSM Server 5.2.2 (AIX 5.1)
I have several of my 3590 drives in this condition. Anybody know how to
clean it up? I think a storage agent is leaving the drives in this
condition, but not sure. Any info would be appreciated.
Hi,
I have (2) TSM servers. Both are AIX 5.1.0 and both are 32bit (bootinfo -k
returns a '3').
I am trying to apply TSM server 5.2.2 on my existing TSM server 5.2.0.
I did the first server last weekend without any trouble..however..I got to
the second server and discovered the following lpp's we
My recollection is that we simply had to define the paths. However, SOP
says be prepared for anything. I also recall that we were told to remove
the DRIVE def's from all TSM library clients. The DRIVE's only need to be
defined to the library manager/owner in a library sharing environment now.
We made the same upgrade 4.2 to 5.1 on our AIX server. We also have 3494
library. We deffinetly had to manually define the paths after the upgrade.
Dave Nicholson
Whirlpool Corporation
Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2003 07:53 AM
40 matches
Mail list logo
