Since you mentioned Dell, one thing to check would be PERC and hard drive
firmware levels. There have been a number of updates to both over the past
few years concerning silent data corruption under a variety of conditions.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 03:07:24PM -0400, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Thanks fo
Thanks for finding that but, as you said, it doesn't help much. The disk
filled to 100% due to DB2 taking dumps but that doesn't tell me what caused
the dumping in the first place.
We are still running Dell full diagnostics (started yesterday afternoon and
was at 78% as of 2pm EDT). My OS guy is
>From the TS 3500 web GUI, expand cartridges, click on Data Cartridges, click
>on mount history(.csv). This will list the last 100 mounts and on which drive.
With ALMS, set up 2 different logical libraries. One for E05 and the other for
E06.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Man
My question is:
Is there a way to determine what tapes in a 3584 library have been written
to by E05 or E06 3592 tape drives?
Because:
I have a library with two generations of drives.
I discovered this morning that my DR Tape Library had no scratch tapes. I
expected around 200.
I found that I ha
Encapsulating the term in quotes ("-980") ought to do the trick. Looks like
-980 is associated with a disk error, which unfortunately doesn't help
Zoltan too much at this point...
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v8/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.db2.udb.doc/core/rsql0900.htm
On Tue, Mar
-Zoltan Forray wrote: -
>2. When doing postmortem on this failed server (still waiting for
>results
>from hardware diagnostics - my OS guy is head to the offsite location
>to
>check on the results and to start reinstalling the OS), I notice
>this
>message from my monitoring system:
>
>3/6
The db2diag.log file was lost along with the root and /home partition. All
I have is ghost messages from the activity log (TSMManager console saves a
lot of the messages in its buffers)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Chavdar Cholev
wrote:
> Zoltan,
> if not you can check here:
> http://www-0
Zoltan,
if not you can check here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21420318
On 3/11/2014 17:17, Zoltan Forray wrote:
With the lack of replies, I am guessing I can't recover this server from
what is left behind. I do have an old DB backups but for what this server
does, it isn't
Zoltan,
you can check db2diag log fir more info, I would start from there.
I am nor sure about TSM6.1 to TSM7.1, my main concern here is different
DB2 versions.
If you thing to rebuild TSM 6.1 on new HW by mounting LUNs from "old
crashed" TSM it may work, and
after that to upgrade to TSM 7.1 I t
Hi Geoff,
This looks like an Exchange environment issue.
Google shows a few possibilities, for example:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/77e12e05-9c64-46dd-81a3-167411a6c7f5/the-wsmanagement-service-cannot-process-the-request-the-user-load-quota-of-214748367-requests
With the lack of replies, I am guessing I can't recover this server from
what is left behind. I do have an old DB backups but for what this server
does, it isn't worth bothering. I can rebuild it faster.
I do have additional questions that somebody might have an answer to.
1. Any reason NOT to
I have a question sent to me about restoring an exchange db. Having no access
to the clients or experience it's difficult to do anything except ask questions
here. I don't have any client side or exchange info to pass on either. I can
only tell you the server level is 6.2.2.
they tell me they u
I am doing the above with the following steps and want to make sure I
haven't missed anything. I already went through this process on a test
server, working out all the gotchas (file permissions/ownership/locations,
etc).
1. Stop all activity/access on old server.
2. Backup old server DB to
Kiran,
What do you mean with "My daily backup window is around 1TB. So making
copypool with the exisitng
tape library is not possible." ?
Do you mean that you don't have enough time, or are you lacking temporary
storage capacity in the library, please elaborate a bit more on your
situation.
Rega
Hi Steve!
This is exactly the reason why we decided for the hybrid migration
scenario after all. It's a big bang method, but it saved a lot of people
an enormous amount of work...
The only thing I do not agree with is what your DBA tell you about how
RMAN works. RMAN by default knows nothing about
Have you considered performing an export node to the new version 6 TSM server.
While the export is running disable the client's access so RMAN cannot purge
the old data from its catalog.
Once the export is done re-enable the client's access
-Rick Adamson
904.783.5264
-Original Message-
Hi All
I'm planning a slow, node-by-node migration from V5 to V6 for one of my
customers. The database is too big to do anything else.
For most types of node, this is not an issue, Move the node to the new
server, wait for most of the data to expire and export/import the remainder
(there is some
No way for real tapes. You can use Data Domain VTL replication for primary
pools, by the way.
Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait,
www.ahliunited.com.kw
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kir
Hi All, Is there a way to make the backup tapes offsite without copy pool
tapes in TSM
My daily backup window is around 1TB. So making copypool with the exisitng
tape library is not possible.
Disclaimer: http://www.dqentertainment.com/e-mail_disclaimer.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
