Hi Roger,
according to my infos, the vulnerability is reported in versions 5.5.0.0
through 5.5.4.x, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.5.x, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.4.x, 6.3.0.x,
and 6.4.0.0.
Regards, Markus
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richt
In http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21624118
(CVE-2013-0472), IBM warned us of a security exposure in the TSM Web
Client. That document says the vulnerable versions are 6.3.0.x and
6.4.0.0, and the fixing versions are 6.3.1.0 and 6.4.0.1.
It does not answer the question whether ver
Hallo Harold,
besides using the ISC/TIP (which I know from the beginning) with the -
"always" - happening browser/java problems (no fun), you should consider -
or at least check - other TSM administrative product offerings
like the Danish "TSM Manager" or the German/Austrian "Power Administrat
I wasn't able to get a newer FF to work at all. In fact, the IBM "specs" say
3..
I finally got somewhere just moments ago:
1: I removed Java 7, Update 13 from Windows Installed Software.
2: I installed Java 6, Update 39.
FF now works properly on the command line.
But, a minor issue: FF compl
On 02/04/2013 01:43 PM, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> As this project moves forward, I am doing more and more research since I am
> unfamiliar with this beast (3494 has been my baby since it was installed in
> 1995).
>
> The book talks about "*to communicate with a server, the IBM System Storage
> TS3500
On 02/04/2013 02:32 PM, Zoltan Forray wrote:
Thanks for the "explanations" but I still don't understand. Does the fibre
channel connection replace the 3494 IP link? I think read that you still
need IP for CLI?
Yes, the TSM server will be configured to talk to the Library Manager of
the 3584
Java.
It's evil.
The admin center command line pop up is a java thing.
If somebody pushed out java patches, that will do it.
And yes, with IE8 it's slow as dirt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Vandeventer, Harold [BS]
Sent: Mo
WOW - I haven't seen Firefox 3.anything for a long, long time (currently
version is 18). Maybe you should upgrade your Firefox and/or try Chrome?
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Vandeventer, Harold [BS] <
harold.vandeven...@ks.gov> wrote:
> I'm back to fighting my access to Admin Center with a b
Your going to miss some aspects of your 3494 . . . .
Here's how I understand things.
The 3584 library is a SCSI library. As tape libraries began to multiply
there was a need to make access to them easier. It made no sense to have
every tape library vendor create a unique interface, which every
I'm back to fighting my access to Admin Center with a browser.
Last week, my Firefox 3.6.24 worked just fine to login and open a "command
line" with a TSM server.
This morning, issuing a command on the command line starts a scrolling bar,
with the "stop" button. The stop button appears dead,
On 4 feb. 2013, at 20:32, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Thanks for the "explanations" but I still don't understand. Does the fibre
> channel connection replace the 3494 IP link? I think read that you still
> need IP for CLI?
>
yes, there is an IP interface (or usually even multiple for GUI and 'CLI'
Why? Because its different than a 3494. It uses IP to provide a web pages for
managing the library. It uses fibre channel to communicate with the host about
tape mounts/dismounts as well as actual data movement.
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.
The 3584 can use a FC interface to control the library, saving the need for an
extra network path between your TSM server and the 3584 library. You will
still likely want a network interface to the library so that you can access it
via the admin interface. The FC interface just uses one of the
Thanks for the "explanations" but I still don't understand. Does the fibre
channel connection replace the 3494 IP link? I think read that you still
need IP for CLI?
Are the drives still separate when it comes to paths (other than being
defined as part of a library)? Is the fibre connection to t
-Zoltan Forray wrote: -
>As this project moves forward, I am doing more and more research
>since I am
>unfamiliar with this beast (3494 has been my baby since it was
>installed in
>1995).
>
>The book talks about "*to communicate with a server, the IBM System
>Storage
>TS3500 Tape Library u
On 4 feb. 2013, at 19:43, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> As this project moves forward, I am doing more and more research since I am
> unfamiliar with this beast (3494 has been my baby since it was installed in
> 1995).
>
> The book talks about "*to communicate with a server, the IBM System Storage
> TS
As this project moves forward, I am doing more and more research since I am
unfamiliar with this beast (3494 has been my baby since it was installed in
1995).
The book talks about "*to communicate with a server, the IBM System Storage
TS3500 Tape Library uses a Fibre Channel interface (also called
Hi Rich,
We have three sites with GPFS and where two of them are we backing up the
filesystem with mmbackup.
It seems to be OK but we had an issue where GPFS TSM database got corrupted
because of strange filenames in the Filesystem where even Linux couldn't read
the files.
But on top of that doe
The syntax error is that command does not have the backup type
that you want to restore. For example,
TDPSQLC RESTORE WSS_Team_Content FULL
or
TDPSQLC RESTORE WSS_Team_Content LOG
Keep in mind that the "/STOPAT=" optional parameter is only valid
with "LOG" type restores. The book gives th
19 matches
Mail list logo
