I am planning to do some upgrades using the "hybrid" method.
The V5.5 server will be shut down, the DB extracted, and the V5.5 server will
be brought back up and clients will run backups while we load the DB into 6.2.
Then the V5.5 server will be disabled for client sessions, and an incremental
The windows native gui does not have this column, but you can choose the
'nsf view' from the backup archive's client gui and it does.
If you are running an older backup archive client gui, say 5.5.3, you can
see this same view from the web client.
Frank Ramke
From: Bill Boyer
To: ADSM-
Yep, connecting as a BA client to the domino node works and will give
you what you need.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:17 -0400, Bill Boyer
wrote:
I was hoping to not have to query the BACKUPS table. Even using a key
column
it runs slow at best.
I could always try connecting at the Domino nodenam
I was hoping to not have to query the BACKUPS table. Even using a key column
it runs slow at best.
I could always try connecting at the Domino nodename with the client an
-VIRTUALNODE=, then doing a QUERY BACKUP. That works with Oracle RMAN and
SQLServer nodes. Haven't tried it on a Domino node, y
select hl_name, ll_name, class_name from backups where
node_name='DOMINO-CLIENT-NAME-ALLCAPS'
You'll get better performance if you can also specify ... and
filespace_name='blah'
but I don't' know how those are named for Domino
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailt
Is there a way to list the management class a particular Domino mailbox
backup is assigned? I need to verify that specific mailbox backups are
assigned to a different management class than "DEFAULT" which has a longer
retention policy. For remediation. The GUI for restore doesn't list that as
a col
Hi folks, if this has already been commented on, my apologies, I hvaen't
been following closely but just noticed this thread.
We were experiencing log pinned issues after upgrading to 5.5.0.0 code at
one of my client sites. What we were finding was that, occasionally, I'd
get up in the morning an
thanks!
Our tech support didn't write down the file name and I believe it was only 1
file, but I will ask if he happens to remember the name.
And I will check out those sites.
- Original Message -
From: "Prather, Wanda"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] re
Happens rarely, but I've seen it before. Freaked me out.
Has to do with how Windows creates the under-the-covers 8.3 DOS file names.
TSM backs up and catalogs the filenames with the long-name version, but when it
restores the file, NTFS will still create the 8.3 filenames by default.
Here's how
In general the way I understand this would work is that if you are
using server to server to send data to the remote TSM server, then you
will need to license it. If it is just sitting waiting for a DB
restore and moving of tapes, then it does not need to be licensed. It
falls back to the active
Hi Robert!
Thanks you very much for your reply! Several others on this list
reported this behavior and (as far as I know) three other users opened a
PMR too. I hope they have more luck, because I'm stuck. Level 2 keeps on
saying that the log keeps on growing because of slow running client
sessions.
-David Tyree wrote: -
>We are thinking about adding an additional TSM server
>to our environment to use for an offsite DR. Basically we would
>duplicate our onsite data to the new offsite TSM server.
>How would we go about licensing for the additional
>serv
It sounds as though an older version of a file was restored, then later
a newer version of the same file was attempted.
Were you doing a Point in Time restore?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Jeannie Bruno
Sent: Wednesday, May 11
Hello. Wondering if anyone else has ever seen this scenario:
We had a 2003 windows server that died last week. Got a new 2008 server this
week. Did the restore for the 'user' drive for all their data. (Used the TSM
gui to do the restore. TSM client version 6.1.2).
But during the restore ab
I believe we've been seeing this problem as well.
One night in the busiest backup period, I issued a "q actlog
begint=now-00:30", and got no results back but an error.
I started dsmadmc -console on that server, and could see that the console
output was most of an hour behind. (And the console out
Can anyone comment on what kind of speeds you are seeing on LTO-5 tape
drives? Any information is much appreciated.
Gary
Hi TSM-ers!
Here is a small follow up on my PMR about the recovery log utilization.
I'm at TSM level 2, still trying to convince them that there is
something broken in the TSM server code. To convince them, I have
changed the logmode to normal on one of my servers. I created a graph
(through TSMMan
Okay, it's clear to me now. Thank you very much :)
+--
|This was sent by koekiesfre...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+
18 matches
Mail list logo