Hi Len,
I have tried both ext2 and ext3. Both seem to exhibit the same issue.
There is nothing in either the dmesg or /var/log/messages that seems to
relate at all.
This is from the filesystem in question:
# dumpe2fs /dev/sdf1
dumpe2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
Filesystem volume name: 5QD7CKPM
Last m
Hi Fred,
Yes it will work LanFree.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
Supported Platform for CPU2TSM::
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms
Från: ADSM
Steven,
What is the filesystem type for the usb drive?
Do you have any messages in the os logs?
Could the filesystem be running out of inodes?
len
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
Haigh
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010
- "John D. Schneider" wrote:
>
>
> This was very good news for us, too. We have one library master that
> serves 9 other TSM servers, plus 5 Lan-free agents. The thought of
> having to upgrade ALL of them on the same day was daunting indeed.
> But
> thankfully, we can do them in groups. B
Fred,
According to the table at:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21302789
the TSM library master could be at 6.1, and the storage agent left
behind at 5.5 or even 5.4.
You are remembering outdated information, I think. So this should
simplify your plans.
This was very g
On 07/02/2010, at 12:45 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:25:01 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:33:57 -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
>>> (file system), and that your Unix resource limit "filesize" is not
>>> restricting the size. Also beware file size limits for a
Hi Fred,
See technotes 1053218 and 1302789 you may find usefull :
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21053218
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21302789
(this second one has not been updated with TSM 6.2 yet)
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
L
We are making plans for the upgrade from 5.5 -> 6.2 this Spring. One, of many,
thing that's causing much headscratching is consistency.
I know that the Library Manager must be first. Since it has no clients, no
problems with the conversion. However, the LAN-FREE storage agents, which must
be
Carrol had it. Just a very large db backing up. 325 gB
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310
Hi Guys,
I'm hoping someone with a little more ACSLS experience than I might be able
to point me in the right direction with this one.
Fundamentally, I'm witnessing seemingly random failures when mounting
volumes in an ACSLS-managed STK L700 library. A cart which fails to mount in
one operati
To look archive copygroup information issue
q cop t=a f=d
"t=a/type=archive" it's optional parameter that specifies type of
copygroup you queried (ba copygroup by default)
Best Regards,
Khramov Gennadiy
gkhra...@computel.ru
Erwin Zavala
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
I am executing this:
def copy domainl policysetl mgmtl standard verexist=14 verdel=14
retextra=14 retonly=14 dest=backuppool
def copy domainl policysetl mgmtl standard t=a retver=30
dest=archivepool
assign defmgmt domainl policysetl mgmtl
validate policyset domainl policysetl
activate policyset
Hi,
Storage usage is updated after a transaction is completed.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Lee, Gary D.
Sent: donderdag 4 maart 2010 17:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Viewing storage used in pool during
Do 'q sess f=d' and see if it's going to tape rather than disk, due to size and
capacity issues.
Tsm cerver 5.5.4 on zlinux suse sles 9.
Tdp for sqlserver v5.5.3.
I can se a session going with a q ses, with a value of bytes transferred for
instance 131 gB right now.
However a q stg on the disk pool into which the data is supposed to be going
shows 0% used.
This makes no sense.
Any help ap
My VM guys wonder if this will work LanFree.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 9:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM support for VADP
From the TSM 6.2 announcement le
Hi Paul,
VADP is supported in TSM 6.2. It is also called vStorage API as my
understanding.
Earlier version of TSM is only supporting the old VCB backup and not
vStorage/VADP.
Maybe StorServe are supporting VADP?
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@
From the TSM 6.2 announcement letter:
>In addition, Tivoli Storage Manager V6.2 and Tivoli Storage Manager Extended
>Edition V6.2 leverage the VMware vStorage application programming interface
>(API) for file-level backup and recovery.
Can someone from IBM confirm that this is the same as what
David,
This utility may be of use for you :
http://tapelabels.librelogiciel.com/index.html
Cheers.
Arnaud
**
Corporate IT Systems & Datacenter Responsible
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland,
CIT Department
I am installing a Windows 7 workstation and have run across a problem with the
admin command line. When I quit it sits for about 15 seconds before
terminating. This is only a problem with a program I have the uses the command
window to run various scripts, it now has to wait an extra 15 second
Does anyone print their own external tape labels for 3592 cartridges? I have a
few damaged external labels I'm trying to figure out how to get new labels for.
David
21 matches
Mail list logo
