Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Windows Mobile also has what is now being called The Year 2016 Bug (search on Google).

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Funny you all mention 6 years. http://www.news.com.au/business/bank-of-queenslands-boq-eftpos-terminals-leaving-retailers-in-red/story-e6frfm1i-1225815661315 " RETAIL businesses across the country have lost thousands of dollars over the long weekend because a computer glitch left shoppers unable

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Do you mean libraries from other makers, or other IBM hardware? Our mainframe guys have their eyes open. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Harry Redl Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Hi, yes - seems like Binary Coded Decimal problem - not only IBM libraries are affected. Harry From: Fred Johanson To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 8:48:37 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years We'll just have to wait for IBM

Re: unexpected result from audit library

You will have to follow the procedure to process a upgrade to the library. Search the TSM support page. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=upgrade+library&uid=swg21203271&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en Resolving the problem When a library is physically upgraded, for e

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

We'll just have to wait for IBM to wipe the egg off its face. VJ in Prague seems to have it right. The logging code written for the 3494 or whatever seems to have been propagated thru all IBM tape libraries. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.ed

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Well, I just found it in ours. At this point I'd assume it's fairly global. If anyone gets / finds a fix, let us know. I have two 3584s I'd like to get back from the future. :-D See Ya' Howard Coles Jr. John 3:16! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.m

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Kind of like missing Mars because meters doesn't equal feet. Many thanks! Bruce -- Bruce T. Harvey UNIX System Administrator, SAIC | DHS/ICE OCIO 1120 Vermont Ave, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005 202.261.9589 (office) - 202.465.9537 (cell) | harv...@saic-dc.com | -Original Message- |

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Well its simple ... 0x9 in binary = 9 in decimal 0x10 in binary = 16 in decimal y2k bug strikes back. V.J. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Neil Schofield Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:43 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject:

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Keith We've got the same issue on two TS3500 libraries (running code v8870 and v7420). It's funny as we were only reminiscing last week about the fun we'd had 10 years ago fighting the millennium bug. We even joked about having systems today that weren't 'decade compliant', but dismissed the idea

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

My 3584 library has the 2016 date in some logs, however, it is currently showing the correct year/day/time. I'll post anything I find in the logs (if I get the time to review). Thanks, Bill Evans Research Computing Support FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 206.667.4194 ~ bev...@fhcrc.org

Re: unexpected result from audit library

That would depend on your library. However, you can check those tapes you recently checked in against those you cannot now find and if the numbers are different lengths you have the volser number issue. I have two 3584 libraries and they are accessed by going to: http://libip I'm assuming your

Re: Help resolving ans5268w

Thanks to Richard. However, our windows guys just rebooted the suspect client, and I pushed out a backup. All is now well. Gary Lee Senior System Programmer Ball State University phone: 765-285-1310 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On B

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

O.K, don't keep the rest of us in suspense! What's the TSM Licensing scheme in 2016? What other changes (good or bad) happen in the next 6 years! David Longo >>> Oscar Kolsteren 1/4/2010 10:52 AM >>> Same here. Got two 3584 libraries showing this futuristic date!!! -Original Message-

Re: unexpected result from audit library

Hello Howard, Yes , they intervened as we didnt had the licenses for all the slots we have in the library and we asked for aditional number of licenses. Could you please let me know how can i check volser length set in the web interface? On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Howard Coles wrote: > That

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Same here. Got two 3584 libraries showing this futuristic date!!! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of adms mailing list Sent: 04 January 2010 14:37 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years Hi Keith Bot

Re: unexpected result from audit library

That's what I would expect at this point either the volume serial length, or the licenses aren't right. I would check the volser length set in the web interface with the volume names you have in TSM. I'll bet the length is different. Then I'd call IBM and yell till someone came out and corrected

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Hi Keith Both the 3584's at my current site are showing the same date. They are on 8870 firmware. we've logged it with IBM From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] on behalf of Keith Arbogast [warbo...@indiana.edu] Sent: 04 January 2010 13:59

Re: 3584 date off by 6 years

Len, The date and time shown in the Operator Panel are correct despite the futuristic Call Home date. All drives and the accessor seem to be working normally. I intend to open a PMR about the date thing this morning. Keith

Re: Help resolving ans5268w

You would probably best pursue this with your Windows people, where they should do 'vssadmin list writers' as a starting point relative to whatever state was reported in the ANS5268W message. Richard Sims

Help resolving ans5268w

Starting This Saturday morning, we began getting an ans5268w message on a win 2003 client. I assume that updates were installed on Friday night, as this is our windows system group current practice. I have founed no reference to this searching the ibm tech support site, and the help in the clie

Re: Linux client memory woes

Just to follow up on this: I've received a confirmation from TSM level 2 support that BA Client for Linux i386/x64 is 32 bit application and thus fundamentally limited to 4GB RAM. I've also been given this link that discusses memory requi