Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread John D. Schneider
David, If you want to email me individually, I can give you a line on both issues. We just retired a 3494, a 3584, and thousands of 3590 and 3592 cartridges about a year ago. Best Regards, John D. Schneider The Computer Coaching Community, LLC Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 7

Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Richard Rhodes
There are companies that purchase old/used media, erase it, then resell it. "Druckenmiller, David" ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent by: "ADSM:cc Dist Stor Ma

Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Shawn Drew
Depending on the criticality, it might be a negative value considering maintenance costs for old hardware. Best bet would be to ask those used/refurbished online places. Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet druc...@mail.amc.edu Sent by: ADSM-L

Re: Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Kelly Lipp
I'll take it! Just kidding: I'm thinking this has some rather significant value. Try eBay... Kelly Lipp CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 x7105 www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu

Used 3494 / 3590 equip

2009-07-24 Thread Druckenmiller, David
Just wondering if anyone knows what the market might be for a 3-frame 3494 with 8 3590-H1A drives. Also, is there market for about 1800 used 3590E cartridges? We just finished migrating off and my boss just wants to trash the whole thing. I'd be curious to know just how much money they're thr

two tsm server instances on the same windows server with library-sharing

2009-07-24 Thread TSM
hello, is it possible, to run two tsm server instances on the same windows system using the same library? Are there any special hints for configure the tsm server and the library sharing? tsm server version 5.5.3.0 with best regards andreas

Re: Incl/Excl Problem

2009-07-24 Thread lindsay morris
Wanda your two cents is worth at least a dime! I never knew you could use a MINUS sign in the DOMAIN statement to EXCLUDE a drive/filespace. Perfect, easy solution for all those "bad=practice" customers who've done this! I hope they lurk here, read this and make the change. Thank you! -- Mr

Re: Incl/Excl Problem

2009-07-24 Thread Wanda Prather
Here's adding my 2c to the confusion: I agree with Lindsay; setting DOMAIN D: is dangerous, because that way all you get is D:, and if someone adds an E: drive later, it will be skipped. So I recommend using Bill's notation: Domain ALL-LOCAL -C: or Domain ALL-LOCAL Domain -C: Domain statemen