>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:27 -0400, "Johnson, Milton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> Why a VTL? With us we found that when we out grew our physical
> library we would have to have to buy over 30 physical drives in
> order to be able to do backups, restores, cut off-site tapes and
> reclaim o
good to know thanks!
On 6/12/07, Chris McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an update for this issue. The problem has been resolved. It seems
like it was a library firmware issue. The fix was to downgrade the
firmware to version 5770. The replaced drive then updated properly, and
the proper s
What time on the 13th. please.
Thanks
Justin Case
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrius
Plantz
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:14 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Date correction: Next IBM TSM web seminar June 13TH!
The date
Just an update for this issue. The problem has been resolved. It seems
like it was a library firmware issue. The fix was to downgrade the
firmware to version 5770. The replaced drive then updated properly, and
the proper serial number was displayed using the web interface. By
downgrading the libra
The date I posted yesterday was incorrect, it is instead June 13th. Please
update your calendars.
Topic: Windows Active Directory for TSM Backup/Archive Clients
This Support Technical Exchange presentation will cover restoring a Windows
Active Directory on Windows 2003 using the Tivoli Stor
Hello TSMers,
Does any one have a TSM server 5.4 backing up old TSM clients(4.1, 4.2 and
5.1) AIX 4.3 , HPUX, windows NT 4.0
I am planning to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.4
Your help is greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Best regards,
Daad
Yes a virtual tape volume can be accessed only by one client at a time
and if two processes/clients try to access the same volume at the same
time one process/client must wait. Again smaller volume sizes decreases
the chance that a contention would happen and also decrease the
contention duration.
I'm not looking at the spinning through the volume to find the file, I'm
focused on the fact that a volume can only be accessed by one client at a
time. You have to read the data to be restored, which takes time. If you
have one client reading the volume, any other access to that volume has to
qu
Hi,
1) You can change ownership of a scratch volume by using the 'upd libv
owner= stat=' command. See help upd libv
2) Yes, the volumes used by the library client (TSMSun) will be return
to the scratch pool. The scratch pool is managed by the library manager
and both ITSM servers can use tapes fro
VTL and over subscription as I understand it.
Definition: When (tape volume size) X (number of defined volumes) >
native capacity of VTL you have over subscribed. If you try to fill-up
all your defined volumes to their defined native capacity you will fail
as you will run out of space on your VT
I can't speak for everybody's product out there, but the EMC CDL (EDL)
releases the used pages from the virtual volume as soon as you begin to
overwrite the virtual volume from the beginning. One thing that does
this is a Label Libvolume.
It would be a simple script to look at all scratch tapes i
As I see it, there are two areas where you get performance hits when
restoring from non-collocated volumes:
1) Tapes Mounts: In my experience my VTL makes this problem
insignificant.
2) Spinning Sequential Media: Yes, VTL volumes are sequential and if
you define your tapes as 50GB native and the
Hello,
I noticed that when I do a query ' q libv' , it shows a list of
volumes with 'Private ' and 'Scratch' status. We have two instances, TSMSky
and TSMSun shared the same library 3584.
My question is ...
1) how do you designate ownership to volumes?
2) does the ownership change back to nul
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 06/12/2007
09:30:58 AM:
> >> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:50:20 +0100, Neil Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > - Since the conversion of a pending delete volume to a scratch tape
takes
> > place purely in the TSM database, a virtual scratch tape will also
occu
Hi Everyone!
I have successfully completed the following:
Defined a scsi library: cdlb_dev
Defined a path from the tsm server to the cdl library: define path tsmdev
cdlb_dev srctype=server desttype=library device=/dev/smc0
Define LTO drives for the cdl library: define drive cdlb_dev lto2-27
Defin
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:20:18 -0400, Curtis Preston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Pretty much everybody who is following the industry believes it will
> morph into the "intelligent disk target" industry.
I see this trend too. It makes me think of ATM. Remember ATM? :) Oy,
I sound like an old f
When you follow the link below, the description says June 13th at 10:00
Central, not June 14th:
Windows Active Directory Restore using TSM Backup-Archive (PJS716189)
Event ID: PJS716189
Leader: Rick Smith
Date: 13 June 2007
Time: 10:00 AM (GMT -05:00) Central Time (US & Canada)
Duration:
>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:50:20 +0100, Neil Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> - We still need to take into account the overhead of the reclaimable space
> on a virtual tape. This can be managed by varying the reclamation
> thresholds, but not eliminated.
With a pure disk VTL, you can keep re
Yes, I tried both serial and element=autodetect
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" writes:
>It sounds like the serial information to me. Did you try the
>serial=autodetect when defining it? I had to do this the last time I added
>some LTO3 drives.
>
>On 6/12/07, Chris McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
It sounds like the serial information to me. Did you try the
serial=autodetect when defining it? I had to do this the last time I added
some LTO3 drives.
On 6/12/07, Chris McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We did recently update the firmware on both the library, and the drives,
also updated the
Hi Matthew!
No, for some weird reason I didn't get those responses, but I was finally
able to label the volumes with: label libvol cdlb_dev search=yes
volrange=db,db0209 labelsource=barcode.
Thank you everyone for your responses! I really appreciate the help!
***
Hi Joni,
did you try the previous suggestions using the reply command?
Also,
John Schneider wrote
Greetings,
This is not the syntax for a CDL, since it does not have an
I/O
door. Why are you trying to label only one tape, anyway, when you want
to label them all?
The sy
We did recently update the firmware on both the library, and the drives,
also updated the changer and tape device drivers on the server as well.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" writes:
>Hi,
>
>By any change has there been a hardware change?
>
>- delete drive from ITSM config,
>- reboot Windows
>- def
Hi,
By any change has there been a hardware change?
- delete drive from ITSM config,
- reboot Windows
- define drive serial=autodetect
- define path to drive
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris McKay
Sent: dinsd
Hi All,
I am having problems with replacing a SCSI LTO tape drive in my 3584
library. Usually a routine procedure, but this time I am having major
difficulties. Whenever I try to redefine the path for this particular
drive I get the following error: ANR8972E DEFINE PATH: Unable to find the
element
try "q reply" and "reply xxx label=xxx"
Christian Demnitz
Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
12.06.2007 14:05
Bitte antworten an
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
An
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Kopie
Thema
Cannot get tapes labelled in 3584 SCSI library: help
Hey Everyone,
I am trying to add virtual tapes into TSM scsi library cdlb_dev which is
actually a virtual library for which I am emulating an IBM 3584 and IBM
LTO2 tape media and I am getting the following error:
Date/Time Message
-
Richard Rhodes said:
>I'd love to have a couple vtl's. When we've priced them out they come
>out to be much more costly (several times) that of tape for our
>environment. We keep lots of old/stale data around which drives seems
>to drive the cost of the VTL way up. I was hoping possibly use a v
28 matches
Mail list logo
