Thank you fellas... great information !!
Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blvd
Uncasville, CT 06382
(860) 862-8164
cell (860) 961-6976
William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/13/2007 06:31 PM
Please respo
If you do that, then the next backup will EXPIRE the backup copies on the TSM
server. They will then be managed by the Versions
Deleted, Retain Extra and Retain Only parameters. They will not be deleted
immediately! There is a technique that has been discussed
on this list and I've used on severa
On Apr 13, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Avy Wong wrote:
I am asked to exclude backing these filespace, but because
they were
already backed up previously, is there a way to remove them off
TSM to
save some space? Thank you.
The most straightforward way to exclude a filesystem/drive is not do
have
You cant, the machine name must match exactly in order for the
systemstate restore option to even be available.
Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer, WNI
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
423-535-6574 (desk)
423-785-7347 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
The next backup will delete all versions from TSM.
--
Phillip
(901)320-4462
(901)320-4856 FAX
(901)652-6337 Cell
(901)384-6337 Home
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Avy Wong
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 04:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
Hello,
I am asked to exclude backing these filespace, but because they were
already backed up previously, is there a way to remove them off TSM to
save some space? Thank you.
e:\data\*.dbf
e:\index\*.dbf
e:\system\*.dbf
d:\undo_temp\*.dbf
Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mo
Hello,
I am asked to exclude backing these filespace, but because they were
backed up all these time until now, is there a way to remove the backed up
ones off TSM to save some space? Thank you.
e:\data\*.dbf
e:\index\*.dbf
e:\system\*.dbf
d:\undo_temp\*.dbf
Avy Wong
Business Continuity
Hi.
I am looking for the Best Business Practice for upgrading LTO2 drives in
IBM 3584 Library. We have fourteen LTO2 in the library and about
thousand or so LTO2 tapes. Would it be best to upgrade the some day the
LTO2 drives to LTO3 and replace the LTO2 tapes as they become bad or on
a quar
Hello Kelly,
We are not doing encryption with tape drives, but have been asking the
questions.
My understanding is that lto-3's do not do encryption, have you heard something
different.
The encryption of the lto-4's is listed on the web site www.lto.org.
http://www.lto.org/newsite/html/news_
Just saw this announcement:
HP AND IBM PASS MECHANISM COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR LTO ULTRIUM FORMAT
GENERATION 4 TAPE DRIVES
Brings New Generation of Tape Hardware with Drive-Level Encryption,
WORM, Capacity and Performance Enhancements
SILICON VALLEY, CALIF. - (April 11, 2007) - HP, IBM and Quantum
LTO4 will include the encryption capabilities.
http://www.ultrium.com/newsite/html/news_4_17_06.html
: : Greg Yuzik : :
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kelly Lipp
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Folks,
I've looked at the Redbook highlighting TS1120 tape encryption to get
the overall idea.
In the more general case of LTO3 and LTO4 drives, which can encrypt
data, how are folks implementing this?
Thanks,
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado
I thought the answer was something like that. But I'd like
to know if there's a way to have the different storage groups
back up simultaneously instead of seriatim.
Original message
>Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:09:27 -0400
>From: Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] R
On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Fred Johanson wrote:
Is it possible to set RESOURCEUTILIZATION as an option for
EXCHANGE? I can't find it in the online documentation.
The TDPs are based upon the TSM API. RESOURceutilization is not
available in the API: the option is used to funnel data at the
Is it possible to set RESOURCEUTILIZATION as an option for
EXCHANGE? I can't find it in the online documentation.
Fred Johanson
When we first install our first 3584 three years ago, we bought around
200 Imation LTO2 tapes. They lasted about a month and we also RMA'd
them all...
We've been on Maxell's for the last three years with maybe 10 tapes,
at the most, that have been bad from hundreds of tapes. (And we're not
s
Hi,
Several years ago I included encryption on our Payroll Server node name
FS4 - TSM Backup client V5.2
This TSM client has now been rebuilt with new OS Windows 2003, previously
it was Windows 2000.
Before I installed the TSM Backup client (V5.3) today, I renamed the old
filespaces to OLD_xxx
Just for what it's worth - an observation.
I run about 2.4 TB of data through my 3584 on a daily process, between
archives, backups, and off-site copies. I've had the same 4 cleaning
tapes in place since my first 3584, with LTO-1 drives, just over 5 years
now - and one tape has had a count of 1
I will try it !! but the main problem of migrating from disk to tape
using only one tape drive will remain here... due to GPFS expectative to
continuously growth (millions of files // 10 versions) and not lose the
centralized point of view of one node.
The other option is to do move datas from
On Apr 13, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Gerd Becker wrote:
Hello *SM*ers,
since we changed our network interface on the tsm server (IBM P630,
AIX5.3)
to Gigabit Eth, we get very often the error ANR0481W, Session lost.
On the
Client Error Log we get the message ANS1809W, ANS1810E very often.
On the
server s
On Apr 13, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Gerd Becker wrote:
Hello *SM*ers,
since we changed our network interface on the tsm server (IBM P630,
AIX5.3)
to Gigabit Eth, we get very often the error ANR0481W, Session lost.
On the
Client Error Log we get the message ANS1809W, ANS1810E very often.
On the
s
Hello *SM*ers,
since we changed our network interface on the tsm server (IBM P630, AIX5.3)
to Gigabit Eth, we get very often the error ANR0481W, Session lost. On the
Client Error Log we get the message ANS1809W, ANS1810E very often. On the
server side the option for commtimeout is 3600 and idletime
22 matches
Mail list logo
