On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:37:59AM -, Gopinathan, Srinath wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> The OS which is running here is Solaris 5.9
>
Well, if it is a VXFS filesystem, you can use the Veritas LVM to extend
the FS. You may also be running Soltice which is basically VXFS under
t
Bob,
Thanks for the update.
The OS which is running here is Solaris 5.9
Thanks in advance.
Srinath G
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Booth
Sent: 08 November 2006 05:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Expanding t
Yes OK
I should have said that
But then again
AIX is the REAL UNIX!
:)
Mmmm AIX
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Booth
Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2006 16:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Expanding the UN
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Mackereth wrote:
> Hi Srinath,
>
> Try
>
> chfs -a size=+G
>
> So something like
> chfs -a size=+50G /apps/tsm
>
> Will increase the /apps/tsm filesystem by 50Gb (if there is enough space in
> the Volume Group.)
>
AND... Assuming it is AIX.
What
Hi Srinath,
Try
chfs -a size=+G
So something like
chfs -a size=+50G /apps/tsm
Will increase the /apps/tsm filesystem by 50Gb (if there is enough space in
the Volume Group.)
Regards,
Stephen.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gop
Hi,
I am getting an error stating that
"The percentage of available space in the file system /apps/tsm/file is
low (0.04769113860967792 percent)."
Hence, we allocated 100GB of space to the Unix server where /apps/tsm/
is located. Now the Unix server team is not able to expand the
filesystem as t
Taking a different approach and avoiding the IO slot I have put 5 new
tapes into the left cartridge.
I then ran the command:
label libvol lb1.1.0.3 search=bulk labels=barcode checkin=scratch
The same error appeared in the activity log:
11/08/2006 16:06:38 ANR0984I Process 596 for LABEL LIB
Check whethe the IO slot is confiureeged coreectly, as the error message says,
it cant move the tape from 4112 to 257, the IO and library is not able to see
the 4112 slot correctly.
11/08/2006 13:28:10 ANR8942E Could not move volume 818ACFL2 from
slot-element 4112 to slot-element 257. (SES
Make sure that the barcode on new tape in IO slot is read correctly. May
perform confirmation via tape console.
Wira.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Dudley
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:21 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
S
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:59:34PM +1100, Paul Dudley wrote:
> OK - I tried the command
>
> label libvol lb1.1.0.3 checkin=scratch search=bulk labels=barcode
>
>
> and got the errors:
>
Check to see if the I/O slot is configured as a 'storage slot' in the library.
> 11/08/2006 13:54:24 ANR8
It may not be a silly question as this is the first time I have tried to
load a new tape in the new 3582 unit.
We have an older 3582 unit that uses LTO2 tapes. For that unit I check
in tapes using the IO slot on the right side of the unit, loading the
tape with the barcode facing out (towards the
Maybe this is a silly question, but have you placed the tape
in the I/O slot correctly? With the barcode facing in?
David Longo
>>> Paul Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/06 9:59 PM >>>
OK - I tried the command
label libvol lb1.1.0.3 checkin=scratch search=bulk labels=barcode
and got the e
OK - I tried the command
label libvol lb1.1.0.3 checkin=scratch search=bulk labels=barcode
and got the errors:
11/08/2006 13:54:24 ANR0984I Process 594 for LABEL LIBVOLUME
started in the
BACKGROUND at 13:54:24. (SESSION: 7295,
PROCESS: 594)
11/08/2006 13:54
Try the checkin command with search=bulk I think that is it
- Original Message -
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Tue Nov 07 21:39:34 2006
Subject: [ADSM-L] Checking in new tapes on new TSM tape library
I am trying to check in a new LTO3 tape in our new IBM 3
I am trying to check in a new LTO3 tape in our new IBM 3582 TSM tape
library that was installed a month ago.
However it keeps failing. I would like to know if I am doing it
correctly before logging a fault call with IBM.
I am placing the new tape with the barcode label on it, in the IO slot
on
I found my problem..
Looks like it's a problem with my TSM client level..
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1019&context=SSSQWC&context=
SSGSG7&q1=domain&q2=ALL-LOCAL&q3=option+set&q4=IC43694&uid=swg1IC43694&l
oc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
My error... Cancel that - additive options are not affected by the
Force parameter.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 7, 2006 1:56:10 PM EST
To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Subject: Re: Domain ALL-LOCAL client option set
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:35 PM,
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:35 PM, L'Huillier, Denis (GTI) wrote:
When using ALL-LOCAL in the domain statement of a client option set it
doesn't seem to work.
Referring to topic "Using options with commands" in the client
manual, what value did you use for the Force operand of DEFine
CLIENTOpt?
Please remove me from your mailing list.
When using ALL-LOCAL in the domain statement of a client option set it
doesn't seem to work.
When I issue "dsmc q opt" from the client the domain states "ALL-LOCAL"
instead of the translated local filesystems.
The system is AIX. The local dsm.opt file contains "DOMAIN /" to back
up the root di
- Hans Christian Riksheim wrote: -
>I am trying to understand what TSM does with reclamation of large files.
>We have a filepool of 10G-volumes and I see the TSM-server moving a 64G
>file during reclamation. This file is from an Exchange-backup.
>It seems to me that TSM moves the whole fi
Hi,
I am trying to understand what TSM does with reclamation of large files.
We have a filepool of 10G-volumes and I see the TSM-server moving a 64G
file during reclamation. This file is from an Exchange-backup.
It seems to me that TSM moves the whole file to other volumes and not
just the small
Hello all,
within our first TSM 5.3 server is running on level 5.3.3.4 under AIX.
ISC is at level 6.0.1 and AC is 5.3.3.0 on Windows.
Whenever there's a need to modify the volume history (STGNEW, STGDEL,
TSM server database backup) I'm receiving the TSM server warning
message.
A
Hello,
The dirmc option is specified in the options file, but query backup
shows that the default management class is bing used instead. How can
we verify which management class is being used?
Ahmed Al Saidi
Try auditing the volumes. If they are offsite, you will have to make them
readonly or readwrite. We have had volumes like these before - it doesn't
even mount the tape, it just fixes something in the database.
On 11/7/06, Rao, Kamran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
TSM 5.1.6.2 running on
TDP for Oracle backup does not show up when query backup is run. The
backup is successful and the files can be seen when query occupancy is
run. What command can we use from the client to see what files are
backed up?
I'm not sure if you can do this with a select. One thing you could try
would be an export node, with filedata=ALLActive and preview=yes.
Matt.
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Fawad Baig
> Sent: 07 November 2006 15:09
> To: A
Hello,
TSM 5.1.6.2 running on AIX 5.1 ML04
I have 3 LTO2 volumes, which belong to a copypool and they currently are in
vault state. Pct Util on 2 of the volumes is 0 and 1 of them is 0.1. When I
query contents on any of these 3 volumes I don't get anything on them.
I would like to use these
Hi
I need a select statement to calculate total GB for all the "ACTIVE"
files backed up for a node. any thoughts anyone?
--
Regards,
Fawad Baig
Hi Andrew,
This is a reply that I got back from our developer. He cannot post
directly to group, so I will be a middle man.
Hi Joe,
I don't think I can reply, so I will answer his questions like this.
> - what is running where. Tomcat is running as a windows service. TSM
is running on sam
Ahh, I see. I knew that TSM tables were built 'on the fly'; but had't
realised that the events table is essentially unbounded, hence the need
for the 'special' behaviour.
Thanks,
Matt.
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Henrik
Hi Everyone,
I am having major issues trying to backup my NAS filesystems. I seem to
be getting a lot of the messages below. I am trying to use NDMP backups
with my EMC NS704G. I am still trying to find what this exact issue is,
but was wondering if anyone has ever seen this before? Any help i
Nope, see the explanation in 'Why does it Work that Way (Andy
Raibeck).pdf' from TSM Symposoium in Oxford 2005.
"Events table is calculated at runtime..." etc
Cheers
Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Warren
Sent: den 7
I have a Windows host that was moved between domains.
It is still trying to backup a directory into an old management class.
There is no statement in the option file or in any global option set.
The problem is the files in the directory are going to the new default
management class- 37 days and
Odd, how can it be that select * from events returns different to select
* from events where scheduled_start>'1900-01-01' How is the table
'special'?
Matt.
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Rainer Tammer
> Sent: 07 November 2
Hi,
TSM does not really care about Windows domains.
(Dont change your DNS- or IP-address on your TSM server, if you change,
remember to change TcpServerAddress in dsm.opt on the clients)
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pr
Hello,
goc wrote:
> hi,
> when i make select * from events i get data only for current date ,
> i know with q event you can get back as defined in server options
> but i would like to make some count(*) and stuff on events data,
> so my question is can i get further in past with direct select stat
Hi,
Please respond below query.
We executes backup through Tivoli Storage Manager V5.3 (Windows based). We
are planning to re-join existing TSM server to a new domain. We would like
to know:
What impact will it have if the existing TSM server rejoins another domain
(in separate forest)
Will it i
hi,
when i make select * from events i get data only for current date ,
i know with q event you can get back as defined in server options
but i would like to make some count(*) and stuff on events data,
so my question is can i get further in past with direct select statement
to events table ?
tha
39 matches
Mail list logo
