Re: NetWare client install

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hmm... Not my area of expertise, but off-hand this sounds like it could be a problem with nwconfig, maybe with the product database (?). You might try NetWare support, as this would seem to be related to nwconfig, not TSM, per se. Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Devel

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
> I would question other attributes of this management class, too, since the > name leads you to think "one year", but the VER* and RETEXTRA settings > seemingly contradit that (though I don't know what RETONLY is)... but that > isn't directly related to this problem, either. :-) Whoops, just to

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I don't think that would necessarily make a difference as to whether files are being bound to that management class, though... the QUERY COPYGROUP output suggests that the management class and backup copy group exist (but I wonder how much that was edited, since "query copygroup" should show more c

Re: 8-character file name/index limitation on Domino TDP client

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Zoltan, a check on the IBM web site for ANS1192E and/or RC959 might yield some insight. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb questio

8-character file name/index limitation on Domino TDP client

2005-09-20 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
I know this sounds bizarre, but I can reproduce this every time. In my DSM.SYS file, when I code the following: SCHEDLOGNAME /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin/domdsmc_vram2/dsmschedw.log ERRORLOGNAME /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin/domdsmc_vram2/dsmerrorw.log the backup session fails wit

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Sung Y Lee
One thought comes to my mind is that.. has it been over 90 days since new policy has been activated and set? Thanks, Sung Y. Lee "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 09/20/2005 05:08:23 AM: > Hi all, > > Accidently sent the mail before without adding all the info! Apologies > for the resend. >

Re: fioGetDirEntries RC=210

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
The rc 210 means the network path is no good... My guess is that the client is unable to access the users$ share. The account under which the scheduler runs needs to be able to access network resources (local system account does not have such access). Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Grou

[no subject]

2005-09-20 Thread Gary Osullivan
I'm trying to install tsm 5.3 netware client from cd Working from the netware server. I selected the "product options" then "install a product not listed" During the install process I get the error message.."product database failed error 2 (nwconfig -6-354) I know the data is on the cd "tsmn

fioGetDirEntries RC=210

2005-09-20 Thread Susan Greer
Has anyone seen the following error? It happens intermittently, after about 1 hour from the schedule start. Only one object inspected; 0 objects backed up. PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=210 from fioGetDirEntries: \\srdceld1\users$ ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\srdceld1\users$' stopped.

Re: TSM Server Recovery (AIX)

2005-09-20 Thread Lee Miller
You can use the command mksbcd with the software TSM for System Backup and Recovery "aka SysBack" which will allow the user to create a full system bootable and installable system backup to CD/DVD devices using a ISO9660 (CD/DVD) or UDF (DVD) format. You can also include additional filesets (devic

Re: 5.2.2 expiration problem

2005-09-20 Thread Cornett, Paul
Sounds like you have a stg pool with the id of 12 with problems. I would start there. ___ Paul Cornett Sr. Systems Administrator IS Capacity Planning Tyson Foods, Inc. 2210 W Oaklawn Dr Springdale, AR 72762 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Import problems

2005-09-20 Thread fred johanson
I think you need the domain name in the import. At 10:36 AM 9/20/2005 -0700, you wrote: I have an open ticket with support on this but thought I'd throw it out there to see who's going to respond with something that works first. So far support tried once but I still have the same problem. They

Re: TSM Server Recovery (AIX)

2005-09-20 Thread Kauffman, Tom
Here's the process we use: 1) Boot from CD, whatever version you've got (if you have a software support contract, you can order a media refresh for the current version) 2) Enter maintenance mode from the boot and restore the system from tape This will restore your mksysb, adding additiona

Import problems

2005-09-20 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
I have an open ticket with support on this but thought I'd throw it out there to see who's going to respond with something that works first. So far support tried once but I still have the same problem. They wanted me to create the domain from the other server, which I did, with policy and managemen

Re: Mac tiger 5.3 client date?

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Roger, I don't understand the issue with the "patches" vs. "maintenance" link. "patches" is for clients with nonzero values in the fourth component of the version name, e.g., 5.2.3.12. "maintenance" is for clients with zero in the fourth component of the version name, e.g., 5.2.4.0. This has

Re: Mac tiger 5.3 client date?

2005-09-20 Thread Gretchen L. Thiele
Oops, I meant that v5.2.4.0 was visible to me with IE, the other browsers were 'iffy'. I also think that IBM/Tivoli believes 5.2.4.0 to be a maintenance level, hence its location. I've seen this modus operandi before. It's only when the level changes does it become a 'patch'. Watch out for memory

Re: Mac tiger 5.3 client date?

2005-09-20 Thread Roger Deschner
V5.2.4 for Mac was invisible because there are two different locations for this kind of thing, and IBM has failed to match up all the symlinks correctly. I had been looking at /storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r2/Mac which only contains up to v523. However, v524 is located at /s

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Some thoughts: (a) How do you know the files are being backed up to the wrong management class? (b) Keep in mind that *directories* are bound to the management class that has the highest RETONLY setting. In the case of two or management classes having the highest RETONLY setting, the management c

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread David McClelland
Hi Sam, I have to say, everything looks good to me from what I see below - what are you looking at to check that your files are getting bound to the default management class and not to the 1YEAR class after all? What do you see if you perform a dsmc restore -pick -inactive against a file matching

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Sam Rudland
Yep - the q copygroup shows the active and standard policy sets. tsm: BKP>q copygroup PolicyPolicyMgmt Copy Versions Versions Retain Retain DomainSet Name Class Group Data DataExtra Only NameName NameExists Deleted Version

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Sam Rudland
Yep - in the q copygroup output it shows the active and standard: -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Beyers Sent: 20 September 2005 10:21 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!) The first que

Re: Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Beyers
The first question would be 'Did you activate the policy set after defining the new management class'? Kurt -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Rudland Sent: dinsdag 20 september 2005 11:08 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L]

Different Management Policy (Completed!)

2005-09-20 Thread Sam Rudland
Hi all, Accidently sent the mail before without adding all the info! Apologies for the resend. I am having probably a hopefully simple problem with management classes. I backup a server and it goes to the default management class, which has a retention of ninety days. There is one set of data on

Re: restore node

2005-09-20 Thread David McClelland
Hi Mark, The 'restore node' command on the TSM server is reserved for use when restoring NDMP/NAS data to a datamover (e.g. EMC Celerra, Netapps filer etc), and shouldn't be confused with trying to restore 'normal' backup archive client data. Here's a link which explains this command: http://p

Different Management Policy

2005-09-20 Thread Sam Rudland
Hi all, I am having probably a simple problem with management classes. I backup a server and it goes to the default management class, which has a retention of ninety days. There is one set of data on this server that I want backed up to a different management class so it is retained for a year ins

restore node

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Strasheim
Aloha when i try this command - i get this error message. restore node MOBILE / FILELIST=TIVsm-webadmin-5.2.1-0.noarch.rpm ANR1641E RESTORE NODE: The node MOBILE has a type that is not allowed for this command. ANS8001I Return code 3. has a type ??? what type ? can i change that type? From