Stef,
I totally concur with you. I also use quite a lot of (ksh) scripts and I
don't feel like throwing them overboard, especially because the guys are
our servicedesk do the tapehandling and they have little knowledge of TSM.
Richard.
Stef Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
Hello,
Timothy Hughes wrote:
Stef,
The ISC is not required to use the Administration Center?
Unfortunately not...
The ISC is the base and the Administration Center is only a "plug in".
The ISC is like you order one bouillon cube and they delivers the
bouillon cube on a freight train.
Bye
Rainer
T
Hello all,
I have installed tivoli in solaris 8 machine which is attached to a library
storEdge L1000. It has 2 drives.
The path of the drives are known as(/dev/rmt/1 , /dev/rmt/2)
But i am not knowing what is the path for robotic arm.
No idea what it should be..
please help me in configuring t
>
> I will attempt to clarify these issues here in regards to reclamation
> and migration. My explanation is based on several years of experience,
> course material that I have taught, and conversation with other ITSM
> experts. Another words I have not seen the actual code and without that
> no
I would be cautious of the tendency to jump to the conclusion that the
database had a problem because you could not query a filespace. As seen
in numerous past postings, filespace visibility issues are often due to
character set code page inconsistencies between the client which
created the filespa
Mark thanks,
This helped make things clearer for me also!
Tim
"Mark D. Rodriguez" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will attempt to clarify these issues here in regards to reclamation
> and migration. My explanation is based on several years of experience,
> course material that I have taught, and conversat
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 19:14, Timothy Hughes wrote:
> Stef,
>
> The ISC is not required to use the Administration Center?
Yep it is. But we don't need the Administraion Center :)
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
Well,
The reason I ran audit this time was some weird behavior of server.
Evidently I found a file space "disappeared". But if was visible only if
you query it with '*' in pattern. And you can't restore single file from
that filespace, but only whole filespace.
I am pretty confident that it was ok
Hi,
I will attempt to clarify these issues here in regards to reclamation
and migration. My explanation is based on several years of experience,
course material that I have taught, and conversation with other ITSM
experts. Another words I have not seen the actual code and without that
no one can
Hello all...
I am looking for any experiences with this client version. We are
experiencing lots of errors as they relate to W2K03
SystemState/SystemServices backups. I have found lots of IC's and
APAR's relating to such. Going to a first relase of the client, is not
that enticing, but does co
Yury,
Not a problem running multiple instances of ITSM server on a single
system. I have worked on machines with 4 ITSM servers on a single AIX
system.
Now the real question is why are you doing an audit db? This is not a
command that should be run casually. You should only be running that
when
Demis,
I just sent you a copy of the itsmuniq.baroc file that
came with my TSM 5.2.3 system. Let's see if that fixes
the problem.
Loren Cain
Digicon
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Demis
Gonçalves
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:
Hi Loren, until now all events has failing, then think the baroc im using
haven4t all classes. The baroc im using has only 80KB and came with the
version 5.2.3.2. The version 5.1.5 don4t have this baroc.
Demis
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, J
Hi TSMers
Did somebody has any experience with running more then one TSM5.2
servers on the same AIX machine?
The problem I am having now it takes five days to run audit db. So I am
thinking of splitting server to two and this way split database which
now has 50G.
My concerning here is how stable i
Stef,
The ISC is not required to use the Administration Center?
Thanks
Stef Coene wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 14:22, Richard van Denzel wrote:
> > How the am I going to administer my TSM Server(s). I sometimes have
> > to do this on a 56k dial-up connection and I don't want to blow
Thanks Rainer!
Rainer Tammer wrote:
> Hello,
> you should install this way:
>
> 1. TSM Server
> 2.1. ISC
> 2.2. Admin Center
>
> The Admin Center could be on a separate machine.
>
> The ISC with the Admin Center is a big Java application.
> I think it is better to install this on a separate mach
Are all your TSM events failing to parse, or only
some of them?
I'm using TSM 5.2.3, so I don't really know what if
anything may have changed since 5.1.5, but my events
look like this:
TEC_CLASS :
IBMBACKUP ISA EVENT;
END
[...]
TEC_CLASS :
IBMTSM_BASE_SERVER ISA IBMBACKUP
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 00:55, Roger Deschner wrote:
> I have heard that you should NOT use AIX JFS Mirroring on Raw Logical
> Volumes which are used to house the ITSM Log and Database. Instead, if
> you are using Raw Logical Volumes, you should use ITSM's mirroring
> facility. What I have heard
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 14:22, Richard van Denzel wrote:
> How the am I going to administer my TSM Server(s). I sometimes have
> to do this on a 56k dial-up connection and I don't want to blow-up this
> line by running the java-sh.t remotely.
Welcome to the world of the new enterprise solut
Hi list, im using TSM 5.1.5 and i enabled Uniquetecevents using the
itsmuniq.baroc. The problem is that there are a lot of events that are parsing
failling on TEC because that event classes are not declared in this baroc. Does
anyone know anything abou that or has a complete baroc with all TSM e
Hello,
you should install this way:
1. TSM Server
2.1. ISC
2.2. Admin Center
The Admin Center could be on a separate machine.
The ISC with the Admin Center is a big Java application.
I think it is better to install this on a separate machine.
Bye
Rainer
Timothy Hughes wrote:
Hello,
I have a quest
That's not right. I just proved it, inadvertently.
I wanted to deliberately empty out a Disk Storage Pool. I had set
lowmig=0 highmig=0 migprocess=4 and it had dutifully mounted 4 tapes and
started emptying things out in a hurry.
Then 10:00 came, and a daily schedule I had set months ago to shut
Currently I have my policy set to retain file backups for 1 year. First I do
my backups to my disk storage pools, I then have 2
copy pools, I copy the data to a non-collocated copy pool I send off site for
1 year, and then make a second copy which I keep
onsite as a spare copy of my onsite-poo
Hi,
When you start reclamation it begins a process and decides which tapes
it is going to reclaim based on the value given. These tapes can be
seen in the activity log of the server. It will continue to reclaim
until it has reclaimed all of the tapes in the list or you cancel the
reclamation pro
Copied from Richard Sims ADSM/TSM Quick Facts at
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir
For an onsite storage pool, the new
REClaim value is observed as the next
volume is handled.
For an offsite storage pool, the new
REClaim value is *not* observed prior to
the conclusion of the current process.
R
I have something strange going on with my reclaimations. I have
the system issue a command in the afternoons to start reclaiming tapes by
dropping the levels to 60%. I then have it issue another command around
midnight to raise the levels back to 100%.
When I get here in th
2) Don't do a delete volh type=all!
Use multiple deletes to get rid of the entries you need to get rid of!
Using type=all I once lost all entries for EXPORTed nodes.
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hello All!
I am setting up a new TSM environment and I am using DRM for the first
time. I have a couple of questions concerning volume history maintenance:
1. I had been doing delete volh type=dbb todate=today-15, but I have
realized that if you set drmdbbackupexpiredays to 14 this should be th
Not every change is for the better :=(
It however does not complain about the options being present in the
dsmserv.opt file. Also when I do a q opt, I also see the options. Or do
they call that backwards compatibility?
Richard.
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manag
On Jan 4, 2005, at 3:40 AM, Richard van Denzel wrote:
Has anyone seen this strange time behaviour on Linux TSM Server
(5.2.4.0)?
I've specified TIMEformat 1 (24hr clock) in the dsmserv.opt, but it
displays the time like TIMEformat is set to 4 (12hr clock).
If so, has anyone got a cure for this beha
How the am I going to administer my TSM Server(s). I sometimes have
to do this on a 56k dial-up connection and I don't want to blow-up this
line by running the java-sh.t remotely.
Richard.
Michael Hedden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04-01-2005 13:28
Please resp
Richard,
It is my understanding that ISC is not supported on Windows XP.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard van Denzel
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: ISC on WinXP or Unix
My PC has
Hello,
I have a question about the ISC/Admin 5.3v install.
Should the ISC/Admin Center be installed before TSMv3 or does it matter?
I know the ISC should be installed before the Admin Center.
I also read that you need at least 2GB of menory if you plan on
installing
the ISC and Admin on the sam
For some reason I'm getting Blind CCed on all responses on this list.
Could somebody please check into this. I am a member of this list, but
just noticed the blind cc. Perhaps it's normal?? Last week I was on
vacation so that may have something to do with it as well.
Thanks
John Benik
The in
My PC has 512MB memory. I've just spoken to a collegue of mine and he
managed to install the ISC on his PC (same specs as mine).
Richard.
Rainer Tammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04-01-2005 08:29
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L@
Hi All,
Has anyone seen this strange time behaviour on Linux TSM Server (5.2.4.0)?
I've specified TIMEformat 1 (24hr clock) in the dsmserv.opt, but it
displays the time like TIMEformat is set to 4 (12hr clock).
If so, has anyone got a cure for this behaviour?
Regards,
Richard.
Hi
Just tested this link and the newer guide worked for me:
(original link): http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3291011.pdf
(manual change): http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3291012.pdf
Donno if this is public but you it should give you the file you asked for.
Thomas Drottvi
37 matches
Mail list logo
