Laura,
Could you also send me that information or post to the group.
rwillmore AT rsac DOT com
Thanks.
R.
-Original Message-
From: Laura Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 5:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hyperion Essbase backup with TSM
I do Essb
I have seen this problem occasionally.
The sequence that I have seen is:
1) A process requests a scratch tape
2) The tape is mounted in a drive
3) The drive has some type of hardware error
4) The scratch tape being mounted is marked Private so it won't be used for
scratch again
5) Another scratch
Yes Richard, I was checking just that and the
previous session is running.
Thanks again!
Richard Sims wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 2:31 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
>
> > How could a backup show it missed for today in the TSM server log
> > and when I examine client event records but also show an ac
Sandra,
With a RC=1 in the scheduler log, I am guessing that the scheduler is
failing to launch the batch file correctly. Search through the
archives of this list as well as through the IBM knowledge base
for reasons for this. A common reason is that the ACTION=COMMAND
schedule has an incorrect OB
On Nov 5, 2004, at 2:31 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
How could a backup show it missed for today in the TSM server log
and when I examine client event records but also show an active
session? ...
Because the previous scheduled session is still running?
Do 'SELECT * FROM SESSIONS' and examine start tim
Hello,
How could a backup show it missed for today in the TSM server log
and when I examine client event records but also show an active
session?
TSM server log shows
11/05/04 ANR2578W Schedule MIDNIGHT in domain PRODUCTION
for node BROVIMAGE has missed its scheduled
Nancy,
In addition to Mark's suggestions, try(credit to Paul Seay):
select volume_name from libvolumes where
status='Private' and libvolumes.volume_name
not in (select volume_name from volumes) and
libvolumes.volume_name not in (select
volume_name from volhistory where type in
('BACKUPFU
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lepre, James
>Do you need to delete the volhist.txt file, or run any cleanup
>against it.
You can if you want. Volume history data is stored in the TSM database;
the text dump of the volume history data is for the amusement of
Hello All,
Do you need to delete the volhist.txt file, or run any cleanup against
it.
Thank you
James
I just look for tapes that have a last use of NULL.
select volume_name from libvolumes where status='Private' and last_use is
NULL
It's normally a small list I get back, then I usually do:
select * from volhistory where volume_name=''
to see what the last status of each volume is. If the status
I would begin with the activity log... Search for strings like "I/O" or
"sense", or "label" and then zero in on any errors you see that may
indicate why the tapes are being set to private. Were they labelled when
you put them in? A lot of us don't trust the pre-labelled tapes and
always use TSM's
Couple things...
1. What is the Last Use column for those tapes in a QUERY LIBV? If it's
blank, then maybe those tapes haven't been labeled. If TSM tries to read the
internal label on the tape and can't, it will put the tape in private status
so it doesn't keep trying to use that one. You can also
We've see something similar before. Here's a place to start
looking...
Run this command to see if you have tapes that are checked in as
"private" volumes, but actually have no client data on them.
select volume_name from libvolumes where status='Private' and
libvolumes.volume_name
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus
>2 libraries - one scratch count is steady, my LTOLIB library
>scratch count is too low, privates too high.
>
>What is happening? Where do I begin looking?
You've asked a very wide-open question. Try this fir
Hello,
Background:
TSM Version 5.2.3.4
AIX Operating System Version 5.2.2.0
2 libraries - one scratch count is steady, my LTOLIB library scratch count
is too low, privates too high.
What is happening? Where do I begin looking?
11/04/04
STATUS Unnamed[2]
-- ---
C
TSM Policy Settings
POLICY DOMAIN - This is a container for policy and scheduling info
*BACKRETention* is a fallback value for any files which
have been backed up under the specified policy domain,
but for which there is now a lack of an active policy set.
*ARCHRETention* is a fallback value for a
Great /andrew.. you cleared all my confusions...
Unfortunately for me .. i have been immediately given TSM and all at the same
time .. i m in Lotus,systems, oracle backups... thats why i get to confuse in
policies that everything requires.
I try my level best to get all thats written, but sometime
STRANGE THING HAPPENEING !
I was taking selective backups of all the database, not using /loggedonly.
Now I started to take incremental backups of the system using the sample file provided
with TDP lotus installation. I deleted the filespace from server to start afresh in
backups ofLotus.
Sandra,
You really need to read the TSM Admin Guide in order to understand how TSM
works. The chapter "Implementing Policies for Client Data" is especially
pertinent to this discussion.
> That means:
> Version exists = nolimit --- I m effectively keeping the files
that
> are on the system
how about . mWhat is Backup Retention (Grace Period) which is defined in Policy
domain?
Sandra
Timothy Hughes wrote:
> Nice Sandra
>
> Thanks
>
> Sandra wrote:
>
> > That means:
> > Version exists = nolimit --- I m effectively keeping the files that are on
> > the system for ever.
Nice Sandra
Thanks
Sandra wrote:
> That means:
> Version exists = nolimit --- I m effectively keeping the files that are on
> the system for ever. Fine with me !
>
> Version data deleted = NOLIMIT - I m keeping the files that have been
> deleted from client forever just in case
That means:
Version exists = nolimit --- I m effectively keeping the files that are on the
system for ever. Fine with me !
Version data deleted = NOLIMIT - I m keeping the files that have been deleted
from client forever just in case if i want to restore sometime later . -- my
r
Thanks again!
Thomas, Robert and Richard for your responses
Richard Sims wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:21 AM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
>
> > In checking the sessions this morning I noticed some multiple
> > sessions...
>
> As per previous postings, Resourceutilization affects this.
> Also review d
On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:21 AM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
In checking the sessions this morning I noticed some multiple
sessions...
As per previous postings, Resourceutilization affects this.
Also review doc regarding Consumer Sessions and Producer Sessions,
as the "data" and "control" division of labor i
Check the parameter resourceutilization
Regards
Robert Ouzen
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Hughes
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple node sessions active
Hi,
have a look at http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir
topic "Backup sessions, multiple" leading you to "RESOURceutilization".
HTH
Thomas Rupp
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Timothy Hughes
Gesendet: Freitag, 05. November
Hi all,
In checking the sessions this morning I noticed some multiple sessions
of
nodes active. Most of the sessions are ending successfully, I was just
was
wandering if anyone has ever encountered this.
Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name
Number Method Stat
Hmm, we don't have a user group here because a limited number of
users, but I could only imagine how these meetings go...
Bob: (stands before the group) Hi, my name is Bob and I have a TSM
problem.
All: (in unison) Hi Bob.
Bob: Well, it all started out so innocent, a MB here, a
Please join us Thursday November 18, 2004, for the next meeting of
TSMUG, the TSM User Group for Baltimore, Washington, and Northern
Virginia.
DATE: Thursday, November 18, 2004
TIME: 8:30AM - 1:00PM
HOST/LOCATION:
Jeskell, Inc
6010 Executive Blvd
Rockville, MD
Please use
Hi Bill !
Thank you very much for your help !
Yes, this was my problem too ! :)
I can't imagine how could I resolve this nightmare whithout your help!
thanks a lot
best regards
pavel
>
>Hi Pavel,
>
>I just went thru this too. The support center pointed me in the right direction,
>here is
>
In worst case, in my shop, we
* take down the TSM sever (power it off),
* power cycle on the tape library (leave it down for a minute or two after
power off)
* wait for the library to come back up and online (20 to 30 minutes),
* power back on the TSM sever.
* do a full audit of the library.
Aloha,
I told the library to checkout a tape .. which i did, but i didn't reply to
the process for 3 weeks ... .But now i couldn't reply to the process.
In the meantine i cancel the process ... which didn't work.
I took out the tape and check it in again ...
but now i have to process, which don't
I do Essbase backups...I'll send you some info.
Thanks,
Laura Booth
Carilion Health Systems
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/4/2004 11:16:30 PM >>>
We have been asked to backup Essbase from Hyperion on one of our
Windows
2000 client machines. This apparently involves stopping the Essbase
application pri
Found the solution myself.
After the crasch, I had 3 Windows Hotfixes installed. When I unistalled one of them
(Q840987), TSM came up running as normal again!!
/Larsa
From: Lars-Erik Öhman
Sent: den 5 november 2004 10:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Change
Andrew,
Thankyou for your patience.
SHRSTATIC serialization doesn't make a difference.
05-11-2004 10:38:29 Directory--> 0 C:\adsm.sys Changed
05-11-2004 10:38:29 ANS1228E Sending of object 'C:\adsm.sys' failed
05-11-2004 10:38:29 ANS4037E File 'C:\adsm.sys' changed during proc
Vere,verd,rete,reto
NOLIMIT,NOLIMIT,1100,1100
Regards, Samiran Das
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sandra
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Retention policy -- quick one!
Dear List,
This is j
The TSM Cert 872 will probably be retired... Will have to get studying...
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Chernyaev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2004 16:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: TSM 5.3
When new certification is required? After an exit of th
Environment: Windows W2K all updates, TSM 5.1.5.0
During this night I had a crash in Windows, and after that the SCSI id seems to have
changed compared to what TSM wants it to be. This is how i looks when i
Library Name Drive Name Device Type On-Line
38 matches
Mail list logo
