This one's probably for Andy
One of my colleages was having trouble understanding my client option sets, so he went
to the manual.
In the Unix Client Guide for 5.2 PDF at the top of printed page number 53 it says that
include and include.archive are equivalent.
On page 233 it says that they are
We've been running TSM Server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 5.2 for some time. No
particular problems, despite the warning in the AIX 5.2 Install Guide. I
think that warning applies to some kind of trial version of TSM that is
in the AIX 5.2 bonus pack, not to the full licensed version. That
warning has puzzled m
Hi Ramnath,
How are you? Hope you are fine and enjoying monsoon in Mumbai.
In order to unsubscribe you have to send mail to
to unsubscribe write your message to listserv AT vm.marist DOT edu
and put your email in the head of the message!
this should look like:
To: listserv AT vm.marist DOT edu
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
hi all,if I backup oracle with the first stgpool is a tapepool and rman use multiple
channels ,can the backup job use multiple tapes?
thanks!
ming
Hi all,
I'm wrestling with client option set management in a distributed TSM environment.
I currently have one TSM instance and manage option sets by nested macros, with
changes to the options file where the difference is unique to this server.
e.g.
nt_common_cloptset.mac :
define clientopt %1
Can anyone tell me how they defined their sequential FILE devclass and
how the underlying hardware is setup? It seems like the best way to do
this is to have multiple physical disks and spread the TSM volumes
across the disks in a way to encourage spreading the i/o across the
spindles. But becaus
V5.2.3 is a maintenance level to Tivoli. V5.2.3.X is a patch level. It is far better
to go forward with a maintenance level because it has been fully tested. Patches are
tested but not to the extent that a maintenance level is.
So they are correct that you should be at a maintenance level but
At 10:32 AM 7/30/2004, Robert R Price wrote:
I know that I must be missing something here, but can someone explain why
this D2D backup scheme utilizes what I assume to be the sequential FILE
device type? Why not just use the (random) DISK storage pool type. This
would eliminate any co-location is
Hi Ameerul,
I do not know if you've already got an answer, but here I go;
What's in the TSM activity log as you try to make a SysBack backup from
the client? I've got it working over here.
The thing I learned that there are two kinds of passwords, the one
associated by the node and the one associ
I did some restore tests previously and found with my multi-session restore
tests some of the restores were waiting for a long time for volumes that
were in use. It was this that made me think that collocation was not good
for this. At that point in time I was using 25 GB volumes, I've since
swit
It works. After the move with the "wherestatu=emp" the four offenders were
dropped from the stgpool. Then I checked them in as scr.
Thanks to all who helped.
At 09:23 AM 8/3/2004 -0400, you wrote:
What I found is that if you issued the MOVE MEDIA command against a tape to
remove it form the libr
** High Priority **
Hi,
Is there any one running TSM server 5.1.5.0 on AIX 5.2 . I didn't get any problems
with tsm clients 5.1.5.0 with version on AIX 5.2 . Please share your ideas on this
matrix while I am upgrading to AIX 5.2.
thanks
muthyam
Sal,
The level of granularity for Exchange backups is at the
Storage Group level. That means you can run backups
of separate Storage Groups simultaneously.
For example:
start tdpexcc backup SG1 full
start tdpexcc backup SG2 full
start tdpexcc backup SG3 full
start tdpexcc backup SG4 fu
> Data Protection for Exchange will only create one session
> for each instance that you run. If there is an error
> during a backup, it will retry up to a maximum of 4 attempts.
Del,
Can you run multi-session Exchange backups?
Do you just start multiple full backups?
We have a 23GB Exchange Server
Bill,
Microsoft SQL Server allows you to have multiple "named"
instances of the SQL Server running at the same time on
the same machine. Each "instance" has its own set
of system and user databases. Each "instance" is identified
by a unique name.
Logically, you can think of each SQL Server "insta
Del,
Yes I did see that, but it is very vague as to what needs to be
performed on each node of the cluster. In previous versions it gave a
step by step process and there were also the redbooks to use as
reference. This offers virtually no assistance at all.
Duane
-Original Message-
From:
Kirk,
Data Protection for Exchange will only create one session
for each instance that you run. If there is an error
during a backup, it will retry up to a maximum of 4 attempts.
There must be something else going on here.
I suggest calling IBM support.
Thanks,
Del
-
Duane,
H... what version of the book are you looking it?
In the 5.2.1 version of the Data Protection for Exchange User's Guide
that I am looking at, the MSCS considerations are still in there.
There is a section titled:
"Running Data Protection for Exchange on a Microsoft Cluster Server
(MS
I have a problem with an NT Exchange server running TDP for Exchange. It is generating
about 360 sessions for both the server and the storage agent. The sessions will not
terminate with cancel session, nor with a restarting of the storage agent. Is there a
way to get rid of these besides restart
Hi All,
Anybody have any recent experience with ITSM 5.2 or greater with
Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003 in a Cluster using failover ? I have been
able to test and use older version of the TDP in the past, but it looks
like the newer versions have all the specifics for MSCS configuration
stripped ou
I'm back from class and I've installed TSM V5.2.3 on another 2003
Windows server and the results have been positive. I've done some test
restores on a 2000 server that I installed this same version on with
good results.
The Unix admins don't really want me to install this TSM V5.2.3 since
they
"The number of SQL Server instances and databases we have"
I can't resist anymore!, what are "instances" ?
Bill
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Crawford, L. (Lindy)
>Please can you help meI am running Windows 2000 adv server
>and tsm 5.2
>server. I can see the tape drive from within tsm and cannt see the
>library...
>
>What could the problem be...Is this HP library
Thanks Del. I will try to do just that.
The number of SQL Server instances and databases we have, plus the hardware
we currently have available (not to mention the admistrative issues
associated with restoring from one SQL Server node onto another in sqltdp!)
make doing "actual" restores of each
Hi TSMers,
Please can you help meI am running Windows 2000 adv server and tsm 5.2
server. I can see the tape drive from within tsm and cannt see the
library...
What could the problem be...Is this HP library supported ?
Thanks in advance.
Lindy
This email and any
What I found is that if you issued the MOVE MEDIA command against a tape to
remove it form the library, then you need to issue the MOVE MEDIA command to
bring it back in. Even if it's empty and you put it back in the library.
Seems that something internal to the tape volume is set that isn't expose
Luc,
In order to obtain a "Try and Buy" license,
contact your IBM/Tivoli representative.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/03/2004
08:45:23 AM:
> thanks Del ..
>
> I ordered the license ... so I should rec
thanks Del ..
I ordered the license ... so I should receive the CD soon ...
I downloaded the WAS client .. and I wanted to test it now ... anyway ..
thanks
P.S. I saw when I did the command SH LIC that there is a line
NUMBER OF TDP FOR WAS IN TRY MODE how can I get a try mode
?
thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: include/exclude
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of goc
>how to include content of /usr/local/cvs/ directory
Have you tried MOVE MEDIA
MOVE MEDIA tape_label STG=tapepool_name WHERESTATE=MOUNTABLENOTINLIB
Bill
fred johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/08/2004 21:56
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PRO
who
32 matches
Mail list logo
