Is Dell Powervault 132T supported?

2004-04-13 Thread Magalie Siaud
Hi, We think about buying a Dell powervault 132T to provide a backup site of our main TSM server. Is it supported with linux REDHAT 3? Anybody knows which drivers I will have to use? Our main TSM server is 5.22 under Linux RedHat 3, 3583 LTO1 library and IBM ULtrium drivers... Sincerly, Magalie Si

Dominique Costantini/ITServices/Unicible est absent(e).

2004-04-13 Thread Dominique Costantini
Je serai absent(e) du 13.04.2004 au 16.04.2004. Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. Voir avec GAD si besoin.Merci.

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Rajesh Oak
Am I missing something here or do you want to connect to a Private Network that is not present? The client can connect to the Private IP only if it has a connection to that Private Network. For that you need 2 NICs : 1 for Public and 1 for Private on both the TSM Server and TSM Client. You need

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Yes, it does. As I mentioned, the DNS for the server points the the 192 address. The session is initiated from the client to the server via this address. When the server starts the backups, they come across the public 128.172.6.201 connection to the server, not the 192 connection. This is the prob

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Johnson, Milton
Zoltan, Try this, from a command line "on the client": ping 192.168.20.44 Does the ping work? If the ping fails then you do not have a connection to 192.168.20.44 and no amount of port opening, aliasing, etc. can get your traffic to flow to and from 192.168.20.44. H. Milton Johnson -Origin

Re: Server recovery

2004-04-13 Thread Prather, Wanda
It is looking for the messages file, and can't find it. I think you need to CD into the directory where TSM is installed before you invoke dsmserv. As I recall, it's /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin. -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2

Re: Server recovery

2004-04-13 Thread Dmitri Pasyutin
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 20:59, David E Ehresman wrote: > ANRE Unable to open language en_US for message formatting. > ANRE Unable to open message text file for message formatting. > > lslpp indicates the language filesets are installed: > > bash-2.05a# lslpp -l tivoli.tsm.msg* You also ne

Server recovery

2004-04-13 Thread David E Ehresman
We're testing the drplan script generated by DRM. AIX 5.1, TSM 5.1.6.3. When we get to the: bash-2.05a# /usr/bin/dsmserv restore db todate=04/13/2004 totime=11:28:56 source=dbb command, we get: ANRE Unable to open language en_US for message formatting. ANRE Unable to open message text file

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Bill Boyer
As Ted Byrne stated, a state of UNAVAILABLE does not equate to bad data/tapes. It means that when TSM called for that tape to be mounted, it couldn't be mounted. Either the tape was ejected from the library and the status not changed, or someone played musical slots and moved things around. I woul

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Tom Kauffman
Zoltan -- There is no magic involved here. Your client only has one network port, that is the network that TSM will use. You can play all the aliasing games you want on the client side; TSM is going to see the connection on the 6.201 port and that is the network that will be used. Once you get th

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Ted Byrne
A volume status of UNAVAILABLE does not equate to damaged files. It means that TSM was unable to access the tape in a timely manner. Check to see if the tapes are actually present in your library; this might require a visual inspection. For the copypool tapes, it may be that the tapes were ejecte

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Ted Byrne
A volume status of UNAVAILABLE At 01:00 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: No Damaged Files on those tapes??? Can I put it to READWRITE? Etienne Brodeur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2004-04-13 11:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To:

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Dinelle
No Damaged Files on those tapes??? Can I put it to READWRITE? Etienne Brodeur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2004-04-13 11:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: No

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
The connection isn't the problem. The client talks to the server (and vice-versa) just fine, if the ports are not blocked. I want the server to use its private subnet to talk to the client, not its public connection. After all, this can be forced on the client via TCPNODEADDRESS, can the server d

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Bill Fitzgerald
I would change the Tapepool tapes to Access=readwrite the use the move data command to move the data off those volumes. This would make the data on them available for the reclamation process. You may want to use the move data command to move the data off the archive pool and offsite pool to other

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Dinelle
If damaged files are on those tapes, what next? I assuming that I have to consolidate this tape (good files) with another tape? Etienne Brodeur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2004-04-13 11:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To:

Re: Scratch tape selection

2004-04-13 Thread James W. Fletcher
** Proprietary ** TSM would select the tape. The drivers know nothing about specific tape volumes. James Fletcher Supervisor, Operating Systems Washington Metro Transit Authority Tele: (202) 962-2482 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/13/04 9:26:08 AM >>> AIX TSM 4.2.4 IBM 3584

Re: Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Johnson, Milton
Zoltan, According to RFC 1918, the following are private, non-routed subnets: 10.0.0.0 -> 10.255.255.255 172.16.0.0 -> 172.31.255.255 192.168.0.0 -> 192.168.255.255 Being non-routed you cannot connect from 128.172.6.177 to 192.168.20.44 unless you have a connection to the same physical subnet

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Etienne Brodeur
Hi Stephan, You should not have tapes in OFFPOOL that are unavailable and especially not in TAPEPOOL! That means the tapes containing your data that needs to be reclaimed is not available to TSM, since those volumes are unavailable. If you check your activty log you'll see messages sayin

Re: TSM chargeback

2004-04-13 Thread Paul Zarnowski
At Cornell, we have a flat fee that covers license and a small amount of storage (2.7G), and we charge extra for anything over that, based on monthly average occupancy. We also offer discounts to departments with large numbers of nodes, to acknowledge that they are helping to support these users,

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Dinelle
Here is the result of the Q VOL ACC=UNAVAIL command Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0 ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol acc=unavail' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Poo

Re: No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Bill Boyer
Are you reclamation tasks completing successfully? Also, did anyone change the reuse delay of the OFFPOOL storage pool? Are the tapes in a PENDING state? I would check to make sure your reclamation tasks are running to completion. Maybe check to see if you have any onsite tapes that are unavailabl

No match found...

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Dinelle
Hi, It will be almost 2 weeks now that our TSM server (version 5, release 1, Level 6.4 for Windows) do not retrieving any "storage=offpool, access=offsite"... We normally had an average of 1 to 2 tapes every day that were returning from the offsite storage. Here is the command: q vol stg=offpoo

Scratch tape selection

2004-04-13 Thread David E Ehresman
AIX TSM 4.2.4 IBM 3584 Who selects the next scratch tape to use, TSM or the tape library drivers? David

Server IP controls

2004-04-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Recently, we have been reconfiguring/locking down a lot of the TCPIP ports in use by the TSM servers and clients, attempting to control/route TSM traffic across a private subnet versus the more heavily used public network. However, we have been having some TSM scheduler communications, due to port