Re: archives dont get expired after retention period

2003-10-02 Thread SUDO Hideki
Hi, APAR PQ65613 you have to apply patch. 5.1.5.1 or higher -- SUDO Hideki AIT,Inc. Solution Division IT Service [EMAIL PROTECTED] > hello, > > > we have some problems with expiring archived data. > > tsm server 5.1.5.0 > > mgmtclass settings are correct. > > > what can be the reason fo

Re: TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-02 Thread Mark Ferraretto
All, Thanks for this info. We'll patch our AIX box and report the results. I'm curious about one thing though. If it's an AIX problem, why does shutting down the TSM server (not AIX) and restarting it fix the problem? Mark -- Mark Ferraretto Unix Systems Administrator Deutsche Bank Hong Kon

Re: TSM TDP for MS Exchange

2003-10-02 Thread Del Hoobler
Gerald, The versions for Data Protection for Exchange thus far have been: 1.1.0 - 4/1998 1.1.1 - 11/1999 2.2.0 - 3/2001 5.1.5 - 10/2002(VRML aligned with base client) 5.2.1 - 9/2003 The version jumped from 2 to 5 to align with the base TSM products. Please read the

Re: TSM and command logging

2003-10-02 Thread Richard Sims
> Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM > for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of > the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of > inexperienced (in TSM) staff. We want a way to audit (beyond the normal > activity

TSM TDP for MS Exchange

2003-10-02 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I'm trying to find out what the history of versions are for this TDP.. I currently have an old CD with 1.1.1 on it. I know the current version is 5.2.1 according to passport advantage and that I can also get 5.1.5 from there. Is there anything between those version? I understand there is a 2.x? T

Re: TSM and command logging

2003-10-02 Thread Alex Paschal
Jon, Why bother with tee-ing the dsmadmc sessions? I really don't understand what else you need to see in addition to the ANR2017I's. Sure, the tee would give you the output of their commands, but is there any need to see the output of their QUERY ACTLOG, QUERY VOL F=D, UPD VOL ACC=READW, DEL FI

Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX

2003-10-02 Thread Wheelock, Michael D
Hi, I have been running 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.2ML1 for quite a while now (3-4 months) with no significant issues. Everything works well and is very speedy. We decided on 5.2 because we were using fastt products for disk storage and can dynamically increase their size (well it requires a down...so it

Re: TSM & DR

2003-10-02 Thread Jin Bae Chi
Can >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/03 02:00PM >>> show volumeusage [nodename] certainly helps...note too that the "show" commands are undocumented and unsupported. On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rowan O'Donoghue wrote: > Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming! > > In terms of when a DR is per

TSM 5.2, AIX 5.2, EDT

2003-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone using (tried) TSM 5.2 on AIX 5.2 using Lanfree with Gresham's EDT product? Gresham hasn't tested combination yet and won't until November/December timeframe. We are building new TSM server and would like to go with above versions. Any feedback (positive or negative) would be appreciated.

Re: TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-02 Thread David E Ehresman
There was a major bug in Aix 5.1 64 bit mode tcp that caused major slowdowns in backups. It was apar IY36925 fixed in bos.net.tcp.client 5.1.0.37. The receive buffer problem occurred with that fix already in place. David Ehresman >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/2/2003 12:27:02 PM >>> On Thu, 2 Oct 200

Re: TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-02 Thread Remco Post
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:56:38 -0400 David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now this makes some bells ring over here. IIRC there was some bug in the AIX 5.1 TCP code, which in particular would shouw on TSM servers. I don't know what it was any more, nor what the fix is (It was just smalltalk wit

[no subject]

2003-10-02 Thread Edgardo Moso
Nope. I don't have problem with the log. That's also my first impression but when I checked the log it has still a lot of space ( 40%) -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BU

Re: TSM and command logging

2003-10-02 Thread Remco Post
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:32:37 -0500 "Stanley, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM > for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of > the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of > inexpe

Re: Path definition

2003-10-02 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
you should use the lb and mt definitions, and the native device drivers for the drives which I think you are saying you do use. you can check this, in w2k, in the management console under tsm device drivers->reports->device information. Cordiali saluti Gianluca Mariani Tivoli TSM Global Response

Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX

2003-10-02 Thread Andy Carlson
Thanks - I didn't realize those levels were on the ftp server. Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_ Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ BJC Health Care|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri

Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX

2003-10-02 Thread Ochs, Duane
Haven't used it, but here is the link to 5.1.7.0 ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/ser ver/v5r1/AIX/LATEST/ Patches. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/server/ AIX/ -Original Message- From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[E

Re: a lot of errors since DP for Oracle 5.2 upgrade

2003-10-02 Thread Marcel J.E. Mol
, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: > Hi *SM-ers! > Since the upgrade of 3 of our Data Protection for Oracle clients from 2.2.1 > to 5.2 I see a LOT of errors in the activity log like: > > ANU2602E The object /mount/appl00001//c-862102661-20031002-0a was not found > on the TSM Server > > I

TSM v5.2 on AIX

2003-10-02 Thread Andy Carlson
What experiences have you had with V5.2, on AIX if possible? Was it 5.2.01 or 5.2.0.2? TSM support recommended going to 5.1.7.2, but I don't have the 5.1.7.0 media, but I have 5 copies of 5.2.0, so I was thinking about doing that instead. Thanks. Andy Carlson

LTO-1 Drive error, key=8 asc=14 ascq=3

2003-10-02 Thread Anthonijsz, Marcel M SITI-ITDGE13
Hi all, I get a lot of these media errors lately. Guess this is media related, but what should I do?? Date/Time Message -- 10/02/03 15:06:25 ANR8302E I

archives dont get expired after retention period

2003-10-02 Thread TSM
hello, we have some problems with expiring archived data. tsm server 5.1.5.0 mgmtclass settings are correct. what can be the reason for that behaviour. with best regards gernot

AW: BUF059 Error

2003-10-02 Thread Gloeer, Kirsten
Your recovery log is full. Issue Dsmserv extend log Best wishes Kirsten -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2003 15:19 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: BUF059 Error My server halted after receiving this error: 10/02/20

Re: TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-02 Thread David E Ehresman
I had that problem and it was a aix tcp tuning issue. Do a netstat -v ent1 | grep "Receive Pool Buffer" where ent1 is the adaptor that your tsm traffic runs on. If your "No Receive Pool Buffer Errors:" line is greater than zero you have the same problem I had. We raised our receive pool buffe

Re: BUF059 Error

2003-10-02 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Ed! This is probbably cause by a full recovery log. You will have to allocate a new one and extend your log. As soon as TSM starts again, start a full database backup. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

BUF059 Error

2003-10-02 Thread Edgardo Moso
My server halted after receiving this error: 10/02/2003 07:06:18 ANR7838S Server operation terminated. 10/02/2003 07:06:19 ANR7837S Internal error BUF059 detected. TSM server code is 5.1.5.0 Anybody encountered this error? Is this a bug? Thanks, Ed *

TSM monthly FAQ October 2003

2003-10-02 Thread Stapleton, Mark
This Frequently Asked Question list for the ADSM-L mailing list is posted on the first day of each month. It was created to cut down on the number of questions that are repeated regularly in the ADSM-L mailing list from vm.marist.edu. I would be grateful for any requests to include additional mater

Re: LOG.NSF - backup it up or not?

2003-10-02 Thread D. Malbrough
Bill, We do not back up the log.nsf files either because they are non-critical to the recovery of Lotus Domino. This file is often recreated during maintenance and that file will become either log1.nsf, log2.nsf, etc and placed in the mail2 folder under subfolder logs. It will be considered a re

a lot of errors since DP for Oracle 5.2 upgrade

2003-10-02 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers! Since the upgrade of 3 of our Data Protection for Oracle clients from 2.2.1 to 5.2 I see a LOT of errors in the activity log like: ANU2602E The object /mount/appl1//c-862102661-20031002-0a was not found on the TSM Server I checked these messages in the TSM log and compared them

Re: TSM Operational Reporting Tool

2003-10-02 Thread Joni Moyer
Thank you s much! It is working perfectly now! Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338 Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: cc:

Re: inc backs up all files after restore

2003-10-02 Thread Richard Sims
>A question regarding how TSM monitors files that have changed.. > >On win2000, TSM client 5.1.5.2, we have found that if we lose a drive and >have to do a complete restore onto a new disk (but with same windows drive >letter), the first time we do a inc backup, everything gets backed up. > >So wha

Re: TSM Operational Reporting Tool

2003-10-02 Thread Remco Post
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:08:11 -0400 Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone! > > I have just installed TSM's Operational Reporting Tool and I am having > problems with the email notification connection. It keeps telling me that > it is having problems with the SMTP server nam

TDP for Oracle dubs...

2003-10-02 Thread Juan Manuel Lopez Azañon
Hi all. I have to install TDP for Oracle 5.1, so I am not sure about the compatibilities with Oracle databases version. I´ve got Oracle 8.1.6 and 8.1.7. May I use this TDP version with this databases version ? Thanks in advance for your help. Juanma.

Re: Subfile backup on Netware

2003-10-02 Thread John Naylor
Not available for Netware John Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/01/2003 11:45:59 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: Subfile backup on Netware Question: Is the subfile backup feature available with the Netware clients

inc backs up all files after restore

2003-10-02 Thread i love tsm
Hello TSMers A question regarding how TSM monitors files that have changed.. On win2000, TSM client 5.1.5.2, we have found that if we lose a drive and have to do a complete restore onto a new disk (but with same windows drive letter), the first time we do a inc backup, everything gets backed up.

Re: Backupsets on FILE devclasses: Mobile or not?

2003-10-02 Thread John Naylor
Allen, The particular client manual will tell you what local device if any is supported for backupset restore. For example my netware backupset restores do not support locally attached devices so have to been done over the network. Of course at the server end the backupset can be on a file device

Re: Tape Technology Comparison

2003-10-02 Thread Pole, Stephen
Here's another one. Try this link it may help you. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/analystreports/tsm.pdf or http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/analystreports/ As for STK vs 34XX. I've used 3494 for years. A few of the sites I have had have a mixture of 3494 + STK PowderHo